Applying grey clustering and Shannon entropy to assess social impact from lithium mining project | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Applying grey clustering and Shannon entropy to assess social impact from lithium mining project


Abstract:

The social aspect has become a key factor in the viability of mining projects in Latin America, and Peru is no exception. In this work, we implemented a methodology calle...Show More

Abstract:

The social aspect has become a key factor in the viability of mining projects in Latin America, and Peru is no exception. In this work, we implemented a methodology called the Integration of the grey clustering and entropy-weight method (IGCEW) which aims to determine social impact and assess potential environmental conflicts. The case study examined a mining project in southern Peru where four stakeholder groups and seven criteria were identified. The results revealed that for the local government and business groups, the project would have a positive and normal social impact, respectively. While for the community authorities and alpaca herders groups, the impact would be negative. In addition, it was also determined that the criterion most likely to generate environmental conflicts was Employment rate. These findings could help the central and regional government of Peru to seek appropriate measures to prevent environmental conflicts during the implementation of the mining project.
Date of Conference: 11-13 August 2022
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 05 September 2022
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Lima, Peru
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Human activities, by their interactive nature, generate differences or contrapositions, which sometimes can induce conflicts between groups of people who participate in it directly or indirectly. For this reason, political tools are needed in which the government, companies, and citizens have the capacity to make effective agreements that allow them to profit collectively [1] [2] . Thus the interests of business, communities, government, urban populations, and civil society organizations must be aligned [3] . One of the indispensable activities in the world economy is mining since, at present, “mining companies find themselves at the very core of some of the most significant real world development debates of the moment” according to [3] [4] . The type of conflict that occurs mostly in Peru is environmental, with a percentage of 65.7% recorded as of June of 2019 (117 cases out of 178) [5] .

Select All
1.
Y. Liu, “Research on the Influence Factors of the Policy Tools in NIMBY Conflict Management—A Study Based on 25 Cases in China,” Open J. Soc. Sci., vol. 06, no. 09, pp. 164–174, 2018, doi: 10.4236/jss.2018.69011.
2.
G. Fontaine, “The effects of energy co-governance in Peru,” Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 2234–2244, 2010.
3.
A. J. Bebbington, “Socio-environmental conflict: An opportunity for mining companies,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 84, no. 1, p. 34, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.108.
4.
E. Innocenti, C. Detotto, C. Idda, and D. Prunetti, “Urban, agricultural and touristic land use patterns: Combining spatial econometrics and ABM/LUCC,” Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICoCS.2019.8930776.
5.
Defensoria del Pueblo, “Reporte de conflictos sociales N° 184,” Peru, 2019.
6.
A. Delgado, P. Montellanos, and J. Llave, “Air quality level assessment in Lima city using the grey clustering method,” Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICA-ACCA.2018.8609699.
7.
A. Delgado, A. Aguirre, E. Palomino, and G. Salazar, “Applying triangular whitenization weight functions to assess water quality of main affluents of Rimac river,” Proc. 2017 Electron. Congr. E-CON UNI 2017, vol. 2018–Janua, pp. 1–4, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ECON.2017.8247308.
8.
X. Li, K. Wang, L. Liuz, J. Xin, H. Yang, and C. Gao, “Application of the entropy weight and TOPSIS method in safety evaluation of coal mines,” Procedia Eng., vol. 26, pp. 2085–2091, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2410.
9.
A. Delgado and I. Romero, “Environmental conflict analysis using an integrated grey clustering and entropy-weight method: A case study of a mining project in Peru,” Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 77, pp. 108–121, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.12.011.
10.
D. M. Franks and F. Vanclay, “Social Impact Management Plans: Innovation in corporate and public policy,” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., vol. 43, pp. 40–48, 2013.
11.
Z. Chang and Z. Qisen, “The assessment of the social, economic, and environmental impacts of expressway construction projects based on the DFGF Algorithm.,” 2009.
12.
A. Shemshadi, H. Shirazi, M. Toreihi, and M. J. Tarokh, “A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 12160–12167, 2011.
13.
A. Delgado and I. Romero, “Environmental conflict analysis on a hydrocarbon exploration project using the Shannon entropy,” in Proceedings of the 2017 Electronic Congress, E-CON UNI 2017, 2018, vol. 2018–Janua, doi: 10.1109/ECON.2017.8247309.
14.
A. Delgado and I. Romero, “Applying the Grey Systems Theory to Assess Social Impact from an Energy Project,” in 2018 IEEE XXV International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computing (INTERCON), Aug. 2018, pp. 1–4, doi: 10.1109/INTERCON.2018.8526372.
15.
A. W. Moomen and A. Dewan, “Mining, agricultural space and land use conflicts: The role of local government,” in 2015 4th International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics, Agro-Geoinformatics 2015, Sep. 2015, pp. 228–233, doi: 10.1109/Agro-Geoinformatics.2015.7248103.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.