Abstract:
The vision of smart factories as a modern self-organizing production plant redefines the role of production workers. Knowledge, know-how, experience and competencies of p...Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
The vision of smart factories as a modern self-organizing production plant redefines the role of production workers. Knowledge, know-how, experience and competencies of production workers become ever more important, making knowledge management and knowledge transfer key objectives for production companies. In this paper we present five different use cases from five different companies, motivating a set of design paradigms for the creation of technical systems for workplace-integrated learning in the smart factory. These design paradigms seek to generalize the solution design for each of the five use cases. We find them to be in line with literature and previous research findings, and valuable guidelines for the design and implementation of said systems.
Published in: 2021 19th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA)
Date of Conference: 11-12 November 2021
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 09 March 2022
ISBN Information:
References is not available for this document.
Contents Select All
1.
T. Anderson and J. Dron, “Three generations of distance education pedagogy,” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 80–97, Mar. 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/890
2.
C. McInerney, “Knowledge management and the dynamic nature of knowledge,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 1009–1018, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.10109
3.
A. R. Hevner, S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram, “Design science in information systems research,” MIS quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 75–105, 2004.
4.
A. R. Hevner and S. Chatterjee, “Design science research in information systems,” in Design research in information systems. Springer, 2010, pp. 9–22.
5.
K. Peffers, T. Tuunanen, M. A. Rothenberger, and S. Chatterjee, “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 45–77, 12 2007. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
6.
D. H. Luthy, “Intellectual capital and its measurement,” in Proceedings of the Asian Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference (APIRA), Osaka, Japan. Citeseer, 1998, pp. 16–17.
7.
A. Picot and S. Scheuble, “Die Rolle des Wissensmanagements in erfolgreichen Unternehmen,” in Wissensmanagement. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 2016, pp. 19–38.
8.
W. Hacker, “Wissensmanagement–intellektuelles Kapital–Wissensbilanz in KMU. Wozu? Wie weiter? ” in Wissen erfolgreich weitergeben. L¨osungen f¨ur kleine und mittlere Unternehmen im demografischen Wandel., P. U. Hacker W. and D. U., Eds. Lengerich : Pabst Science Publishers, 2011.
9.
H. Dornmayr and M. Rechberger, Demand for/Lack of Skilled Labour in Austria in 2020. ibw - institut f¨ur Bildungsforschung der Wirtschaft, Dec 2020. [Online]. Available: https://ibw.at/resource/download/2141/ibw-researchbrief-108-en,pdf
10.
N. Elmqaddem, “Augmented reality and virtual reality in education. myth or reality? ” International journal of emerging technologies in learning, vol. 14, no. 3, 2019.
11.
G. Kurubacak and H. Altinpulluk, Mobile technologies and augmented reality in open education. Igi Global, 2017.
12.
C. McKenna. ( 2006 ) A Plasser Theurer 09- 16 CSM Tamper / Liner. [Online]. Available: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/82/Carillion-73105-01.jpg. Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
13.
T. Ley, “Knowledge structures for integrating working and learning: A reflection on a decade of learning technology research for workplace learning,” British Journal of Educational Technology, 06 2019.
14.
D. Mourtzis, E. Vlachou, G. Dimitrakopoulos, and V. Zogopoulos, “Cyber-Physical Systems and Education 4.0 –The Teaching Factory 4.0 Concept,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 23, pp. 129–134, Jan. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978918304773
15.
N. Kersh, E. Waite, and K. Evans, “The spatial dimensions of workplace learning: Acquiring literacy and numeracy skills within the workplace,” in Changing Spaces of Education. Routledge, 2012, num Pages: 21.
16.
N. Hopwood, “Four essential dimensions of workplace learning,” Journal of Workplace Learning, vol. 26, no. 6/7, pp. 349–363, Jan. 2014, publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-09-2013-0069
17.
T. Sattler, B. Leibe, and L. Kobbelt, “Fast image-based localization using direct 2d-to-3d matching,” in 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 2011, pp. 667–674.
18.
P.-E. Sarlin, D. DeTone, T. Malisiewicz, and A. Rabinovich, “Superglue: Learning feature matching with graph neural networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 4938–4947.
19.
E. Wenger, Communities of Practice, ser. Learning in doing. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, 7 1998.
20.
E. Wenger, R. A. McDermott, and W. Snyder, Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business Press, 2002.
21.
J. Lave and E. Wenger, “Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation,” Learning in doing, 1991.
22.
S. Paavola and K. Hakkarainen, “The Knowledge Creation Metaphor–An Emergent Epistemological Approach to Learning,” Science Education, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 535–557, 8 2005.
23.
M. Weiser, “Hot topics-ubiquitous computing,” Computer, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 71–72, 1993.
24.
K. Henricksen, J. Indulska, and A. Rakotonirainy, “Modeling context information in pervasive computing systems,” in International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Springer, 2002, pp. 167–180.
25.
A. Novotny and C. Bauer, “What do we really talk about when we talk about context in pervasive computing: a review and exploratory analysis,” in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications Services, 2017, pp. 301–310.
26.
M. Kuniavsky, Smart things: ubiquitous computing user experience design. Elsevier, 2010.
27.
G. Gassler, T. Hug, and C. Glahn, “Integrated Micro Learning–An outline of the basic method and first results,” Interactive Computer Aided Learning, vol. 4, 2004.
28.
G. Gassler, T. Hug, and C. Glahn, “Integrated Learning with Micro Activities during Access Delays,” in Proceedings of EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2004, L. Cantoni and C. McLoughlin, Eds. Lugano, Switzerland : Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 2004, pp. 3873–3876. [Online]. Available: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/12079
29.
T. Ley, A. Ulbrich, P. Scheir, S. Lindstaedt, B. Kump, and D. Albert, “Modeling competencies for supporting work-integrated learning in knowledge work,” J. Knowledge Management, vol. 12, pp. 31–47, 10 2008.
