Abstract:
Functional safety has become a crucial part of industrial automation. With industry environments being connected more than ever, achieving required functional safety depe...Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
Functional safety has become a crucial part of industrial automation. With industry environments being connected more than ever, achieving required functional safety depends on establishing safety-critical communication. Numerous application layer safety protocols have been developed to ensure compliance with functional safety standards for wired communications. However, with all the benefits wireless communications entails, wireless communication is pushing for an important place in the future of industrial automation. It is important that safety protocols also follow this transition and are able to operate as intended using a wireless channel. By default, openSAFETY frames are exchanged using UDP broadcast, whereas TCP provides additional reliability features. Thus, the aim of this paper is to analyze if safety-critical communication using a wireless channel can benefit from the additional reliability features provided by TCP. To answer this, we experimentally analyze the performance of openSAFETY protocol providing functional safety over the IEEE 802.11 standard for three different test cases. We analyze the performance in terms of median end-to-end delay and time spent by a safety node in a safe state for both protocol stacks. Results show that UDP provides lower median end-to-end delay, whereas TCP is able to achieve less time spent in a safe state under bounded delay constraint.
Published in: 2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA )
Date of Conference: 07-10 September 2021
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 30 November 2021
ISBN Information:
Keywords assist with retrieval of results and provide a means to discovering other relevant content. Learn more.
- IEEE Keywords
- Index Terms
- Low Medium ,
- Safety Standards ,
- Safe Conditions ,
- Industrial Environment ,
- Safety Protocols ,
- Application Layer ,
- Place In The Future ,
- Protocol Stack ,
- Transmission Control Protocol ,
- User Datagram Protocol ,
- Service Quality ,
- Internet Of Things ,
- Wireless Networks ,
- Cycle Time ,
- Measurement Setup ,
- Industrial Systems ,
- Communication Protocol ,
- Probability Of Failure ,
- Data Frame ,
- Time Synchronization ,
- Transport Layer ,
- Cyber-physical Systems ,
- Low Jitter ,
- Delay Distribution ,
- Faster Reaction Times ,
- Large Delay ,
- Impact Of Interference ,
- Message Transmission
- Author Keywords
- openSAFETY ,
- MQTT ,
- UDP ,
- TCP ,
- Functional safety ,
- 802.11 WiFi ,
- End-to-end delay
Keywords assist with retrieval of results and provide a means to discovering other relevant content. Learn more.
- IEEE Keywords
- Index Terms
- Low Medium ,
- Safety Standards ,
- Safe Conditions ,
- Industrial Environment ,
- Safety Protocols ,
- Application Layer ,
- Place In The Future ,
- Protocol Stack ,
- Transmission Control Protocol ,
- User Datagram Protocol ,
- Service Quality ,
- Internet Of Things ,
- Wireless Networks ,
- Cycle Time ,
- Measurement Setup ,
- Industrial Systems ,
- Communication Protocol ,
- Probability Of Failure ,
- Data Frame ,
- Time Synchronization ,
- Transport Layer ,
- Cyber-physical Systems ,
- Low Jitter ,
- Delay Distribution ,
- Faster Reaction Times ,
- Large Delay ,
- Impact Of Interference ,
- Message Transmission
- Author Keywords
- openSAFETY ,
- MQTT ,
- UDP ,
- TCP ,
- Functional safety ,
- 802.11 WiFi ,
- End-to-end delay