Understanding the Imaging Capability of Tundra Orbits Compared to Other Orbits

For operational weather forecasting and nowcasting, a refresh rate (RR) of 10 min and a better-than-4-km footprint size for Infrared (IR) bands is desired. Such imaging capability is only available from geostationary orbit (GEO) satellites, such as ABI onboard geostationary operational environmental satellites (GOES)-16/-17, but mainly limited to the tropics and mid-latitudes (referred to as GEO-like imaging capability). For high latitudes such as the Alaskan region, the IR footprint size from ABI/GOES-17 is worse than 6 km, limiting the application over the region. Tundra satellites, with a nonzero inclination angle and a nonzero eccentricity, have longer dwell times near the apogee than the perigee and can be used to monitor the high latitudes and polar regions. This study investigates Tundra satellites’ imaging capability by assuming an ABI-like instrument with the same IR spatial resolution of
$56~\mu $
rad onboard. For regional applications, a constellation of two Tundra satellites may provide GEO-like imaging capability for a large domain. This useful domain is further improved when combined with a GEO, i.e., two
$Tundra + GOES-17$
. For global applications, a constellation of three Tundra satellites may provide GEO-like imaging capability for high latitudes (improved capability over GEO) and polar regions (unprecedented capability) in both hemispheres. The additional capability from Tundra satellites in tropics and mid-latitudes makes the global space-based meteorological observing system more robust and resilient. While a constellation of three
$Tundra + 3$
GEOs may provide global GEO-like imaging capability, having more than three GEOs may be desired by agencies/countries, allowing for improved spatial resolutions over their sub-point locations.