Loading web-font TeX/Math/Italic
Myocardial Infarction Segmentation From Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI By Neural Networks and Prior Information | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Myocardial Infarction Segmentation From Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI By Neural Networks and Prior Information


Abstract:

In this paper, we propose an automatic myocardial infarction segmentation framework from Delayed Enhancement cardiac MRI (DE-MRI) using a convolutional neural network (CN...Show More

Abstract:

In this paper, we propose an automatic myocardial infarction segmentation framework from Delayed Enhancement cardiac MRI (DE-MRI) using a convolutional neural network (CNN) and prior information-based post-treatments. The work was conducted on our DE-MRI dataset, which is collected from daily clinical practice. 195 cases of DE-MRI examinations constitute this dataset, including on average 7 images per case with manually drawn contours by an expert. The objective is to automatically segment myocardial infarctions on both healthy and pathological images in the dataset. In the proposed framework, a downsampling-upsampling segmentation CNN firstly generates high recall segmentations of myocardial infarction from left ventricle DE-MR images, then the proposed prior information-based post-processing method identifies and removes false-positive segmentations from the CNN's prediction. To obtain a high recall prediction, two U-NET like semantic segmentation networks are investigated: CE-NET and its backbone with Dice loss and Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) using a batch size of value 1. The prior information-based post-processing evaluates every single contour in the CNN's segmentations: region features in each contour are compared to criteria which are firstly estimated based on the training set images and eventually fine-tuned based on the validation set images. All non-conforming contours are removed from the predictions to improve the accuracy of the segmentation. Combining the high recall networks and prior postprocessing information, we achieve segmentation results comparable to those produced by human experts.
Date of Conference: 19-24 July 2020
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 28 September 2020
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Glasgow, UK
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Late Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Delayed enhancement MRI or DE-MRI) has become the reference exam for myocardial infarction quantification. In such an image, acquired several minutes after the injection of the gadolinium contrast agent, normal myocardiums and ischemic tissues show different signals, that allow to distinguish the myocardial infarction (that appears in bright) from its surrounding healthy tissues (that appear in grey). Furthermore, this exam has been largely applied worldwide for accurate myocardial ischemic and non-ischemic pathology inspection [1] in routine clinical practice.

Select All
1.
J. Vogel-Claussen, C. Rochitte, K. Wu, I. Kamel, T. Foo, J. Lima, and D. Bluemke, “Delayed enhancement mr imaging: Utility in myocardial assessment1,” Radiographics, vol. 26, pp. 795–810, 05 2006.
2.
L. C. Amado, B. L. Gerber, S. N. Gupta, D. W. Rettmann, G. Szarf, R. Schock, K. Nasir, D. L. Kraitchman, and J. A. Lima, “Accurate and objective infarct sizing by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a canine myocardial infarction model,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 2383–2389, 12 2004.
3.
R. Kim, D. Fieno, T. Parrish, K. Harris, E. Chen, O. Simonetti, J. Bundy, J. Finn, F. Klocke, and R. Judd, “Relationship of mri delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function,” Circulation, vol. 100, no. 19, pp. 1992–2002, 11 1999.
4.
A. Lalande, V. Valindria, M. Angue, N. Vignon, A. Cochet, and F. Brunotte, “Automatic evaluation of the peri-infarct area of myocardial infarction from delayed enhancement mri,” in European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology (ESMRMB), Lisbonne, Portugal, 10 2012.
5.
R. Karim et al., “Evaluation of state-of-the-art segmentation algorithms for left ventricle infarct from late gadolinium enhancement mr images,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 30, pp. 95–107, 2016.
6.
E. de la Rosa, D. Sidibe, T. Decourselle, T. Leclercq, A. Cochet, and A. Lalande, “Myocardial infarction quantification from late gadolinium enhancement mri using top-hat transforms and neural networks,” Computers methods and programs in biomedicine [Under review], 2019, unpublished. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.02911
7.
M. Avendi, A. Kheradvar, and H. Jafarkhani, “A combined deep-learning and deformable-model approach to fully automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac mri,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 30, pp. 108–119, 2016.
8.
J. Long, E. Shelhamer, and T. Darrell, “Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation,” in 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2015, pp. 3431–3440.
9.
O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” vol. 9351, 10 2015, pp. 234–241.
10.
R. Mehta and J. Sivaswamy, “M-net: A convolutional neural network for deep brain structure segmentation,” in 2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017), April 2017, pp. 437–440.
11.
T. M. Quan, D. G. C. Hildebrand, and W. Jeong, “Fusionnet: A deep fully residual convolutional neural network for image segmentation in connectomics,” CoRR, vol. abs/1612.05360, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.05360
12.
Z. Gu, J. Cheng, H. Fu, K. Zhou, H. Hao, Y. Zhao, T. Zhang, S. Gao, and J. Liu, “Ce-net: Context encoder network for 2d medical image segmentation,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 2281–2292, Oct 2019.
13.
C. H. Sudre, W. Li, T. Vercauteren, S. Ourselin, and M. J. Cardoso, “Generalised dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentations,” in Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support - DLMIA, 2017, pp. 240–248. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67558-928
14.
S. Taghanaki, Y. Zheng, S. K. Zhou, B. Georgescu, P. Sharma, D. Xu, D. Comaniciu, and G. Hamarneh, “Combo loss: Handling input and output imbalance in multi-organ segmentation,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 75, 05 2019.
15.
M. Majurski, P. Manescu, S. Padi, N. Schaub, N. Hotaling, C. Simon Jr, and P. Bajcsy, “Cell image segmentation using generative adversarial networks, transfer learning, and augmentations,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops.
16.
Y. Xue, T. Xu, H. Zhang, L. R. Long, and X. Huang, “Segan: Adversarial network with multi-scale L1 loss for medical image segmentation,” Neuroinformatics, vol. 16, no. 3-4, pp. 383–392, 2018.
17.
D. Opitz and R. Maclin, “Popular ensemble methods: An empirical study,” Journal of artificial intelligence research, vol. 11, pp. 169–198, 1999.
18.
K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, pp. 770–778.
19.
L.-C. Chen, G. Papandreou, I. Kokkinos, K. Murphy, and A. L. Yuille, “Deeplab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 834–848, 2017.
20.
I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning. The MIT Press, 2016.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.