Charge balancing for advanced MMC-Double-Submodules with ultra-low loss | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Charge balancing for advanced MMC-Double-Submodules with ultra-low loss


Abstract:

Reduction of capacitor size and further reduction of power loss are important for many future application fields of Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC). In addition, fully...Show More

Abstract:

Reduction of capacitor size and further reduction of power loss are important for many future application fields of Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC). In addition, fully electronic current limitation and cut off - both at AC- and DC-side - and a wide operating range of DC-voltage are valuable at the system level. Submodules with bipolar terminal voltage are known to be helpful for achieving these objectives. Unfortunately, power losses increase, considerably, when applying conventional Full-Bridge submodules. Very few submodule topologies are existing, which enable bipolar terminal voltage combined with reduced power loss and capacitor size. In the past, mainly the “double submodule approach” has led to essential improvements concerning these issues [1], [2], [3]. The Semi-Full-Bridge is one of the most promising topologies, following this approach [4], but internal capacitor balancing and power loss are not fully satisfying [5], [6]. An advanced submodule topology and a suitable control concept are presented.
Date of Conference: 23-25 April 2019
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 11 October 2019
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Sonderborg, Denmark
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Progress of high power voltage source converters (VSC) remains important for many future application fields, in particular: Grid infrastructure, better exploitation of solar and wind power resources, multi-terminal HVDC- and MVDC-networks, medium voltage drives and others. Modular Multilevel Converters (MMC) have been introduced successfully into these fields, because of several essential advantages compared to conventional VSC or multilevel VSC [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. With respect to performance and extended functionality of the converters, a superordinate system level view is necessary, when looking at these future applications: Passive components “around” the converter, like harmonic filters, transformers, mechanical switch gears and protection devices offer very low potential for improvements, in future. The scope of protection must be extended (beyond the semiconductors) to the system level. Looking into the converter, the size and cost of the submodule capacitors have remained unsatisfying in many applications of MMC. Obviously, this specific drawback is originating from the basic concept of distributed energy storage. Therefore, progress - concerning this point - will not come for free. New submodule topologies with higher expense for the semiconductors and improved control concepts are the main options [12], [13], [14]. This paper will focus on the first point.

Select All
1.
R. Marquardt, “Modular multilevel converter: An universal concept for hvdc-networks and extended dc-bus-applications,” IPEC, 2010.
2.
R. Marquardt,, “Modular multilevel converter topologies with dc-short circuit current limitation,” ECCE, 2011.
3.
D. Schmitt, Y. Wang, T. Weyh, and R. Marquardt, “Dc-side fault current management in extended multiterminal-hvdc-grids,” International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals and Devices, 2012.
4.
K. Ilves, L. Bessegato, L. Harnefors, S. Norrga, and H.-P. Nee, “Semi-full-bridge submodule for modular multilevel converters,” ECCE, 2015.
5.
S. Heinig, K. Jacobs, K. Ilves, S. Norrga, and H.-P. Nee, “Implications of capacitor voltage imbalance on the operation of the semi-full-bridge submodule,” EPE, 2017.
6.
K. Ilves, Y. Okazaki, N. Chen, M. Nawaz, and A. Antonopoulos, “Capacitor voltage balancing in semi-full-bridge submodule with differential-mode choke,” IPEC, 2018.
7.
J. Dorn, H. Huang, and D. Retzmann, “Novel voltage-sourced converters for hvdc and facts applications,” CIGRE, 2007.
8.
J. Kolb, F. Kammerer, and M. Braun, “Dimensioning and design of a modular multilevel converter for drive applications,” EPE-PEMC, 2012.
9.
A. Antonopoulos, L. Ängquist, S. Norrga, K. Ilves, and H.-P. Nee, “Modular multilevel converter ac motor drives with constant torque from zero to nominal speed,” ECCE, 2012.
10.
F. Schettler, H. Huang, and N. Christl, “Hvdc transmission systems using voltage sourced converters - design and applications,” IEEE Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 2000.
11.
P. Himmelmann, M. Hiller, D. Krug, and M. Beuermann, “A new modular multilevel converter for medium voltage high power oil & gas motor drive applications,” EPE, 2016.
12.
Y. Wang and R. Marquardt, “Novel control scheme for the internal energies and circulating currents of modular multilevel converter,” PCIM, 2017.
13.
D. Dinkel, C. Hillermeier, and R. Marquardt, “Dynamic control and design of a modular power flow controller for hvdc networks with fault clearing capabilities,” PCIM, 2018.
14.
D. Dinkel, C. Hillermeier, and R. Marquardt, “Direct multivariable control of modular multilevel converters,” EPE, 2018.
15.
K. Ilves, “Modeling and design of modular multilevel converters for grid applications,” Ph.D. dissertation, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2014.
16.
R. Marquardt, “Modular multilevel converter: Impact on future applications and semiconductors,” VDE, 7. ETG-Fachtagung, Bad Nauheim, 2017.
17.
C. Dahmen and R. Marquardt, “Progress of high power multilevel converters: Combining silicon and silicon carbide,” PCIM Europe, 2017.
18.
C. Dahmen, F. Kapaun, and R. Marquardt, “Analytical investigation of efficiency and operating range of different modular multilevel converters,” PEDS, 2017.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.