Experimental Evaluation of Continuum Deformation with a Five Quadrotor Team | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Experimental Evaluation of Continuum Deformation with a Five Quadrotor Team


Abstract:

This paper experimentally evaluates continuum deformation cooperative control for the first time. Theoretical results are expanded to place a bounding triangle on the lea...Show More

Abstract:

This paper experimentally evaluates continuum deformation cooperative control for the first time. Theoretical results are expanded to place a bounding triangle on the leader-follower system such that the team is contained despite nontrivial tracking error. Flight tests were conducted with custom quadrotors running a modified version of ArduPilot on a BeagleBone Blue in M-Air, an outdoor netted flight facility. Motion capture and an onboard inertial measurement unit were used for state estimation. Position error was characterized in single vehicle tests using quintic spline trajectories and different reference velocities. Five-quadrotor leader trajectories were generated, and followers executed the continuum deformation control law in-flight. Flight tests successfully demonstrated continuum deformation; future work in characterizing error propagation from leaders to followers is discussed.
Date of Conference: 10-12 July 2019
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 29 August 2019
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Cooperative control is a popular area of theoretical research. Virtual structure (VS) [1], consensus [2]–[4], containment control [5], [6], and continuum deformation [7], [8] are examples of multi-agent system (MAS) control. VS is a centralized approach, while others are decentralized. Consensus is the most commonly-applied decentralized cooperative control technique [3], [4], [9]–-[11]. Distributed consensus was applied for agent coordination in [12], [13] and flight tested in [14], [15]. Consensus guided by a single leader is studied in [16], [17] and flight tested in [18], [19]. Cooperative control has been applied to unmanned aircraft system (UAS) teams for tasks such as surveillance [20], area surveys [21], and payload delivery [22].

Select All
1.
W. Ren and R. W. Beard, “Decentralized scheme for spacecraft formation flying via the virtual structure approach,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 73–82, 2004.
2.
W. Ren, R. W. Beard, and E. M. Atkins, “Information consensus in multivehicle cooperative control,” IEEE Control Systems, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 71–82, 2007.
3.
N. Rahbari-Asr, U. Ojha, Z. Zhang, and M.-Y. Chow, “Incremental welfare consensus algorithm for cooperative distributed generation/demand response in smart grid,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 2836–2845, 2014.
4.
S. E. Inzucchi, R. M. Bergenstal, J. B. Buse, M. Diamant, E. Ferrannini, M. Nauck, A. L. Peters, A. Tsapas, R. Wender, and D. R. Matthews, “Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the american diabetes association and the european association for the study of diabetes,” Diabetes care, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 140–149, 2015.
5.
J. Qin, W. X. Zheng, H. Gao, Q. Ma, and W. Fu, “Containment control for second-order multiagent systems communicating over heterogeneous networks,” IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 2017.
6.
Z. Li, Z. Duan, W. Ren, and G. Feng, “Containment control of linear multi-agent systems with multiple leaders of bounded inputs using distributed continuous controllers,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 25, no. 13, pp. 2101–2121, 2015.
7.
H. Rastgoftar, Continuum deformation of multi-agent systems. Springer, 2016.
8.
H. Rastgoftar and E. M. Atkins, “Continuum deformation of multiagent systems under directed communication topologies,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, vol. 139, no. 1, 2017.
9.
Y. Liu and Z. Geng, “Finite-time formation control for linear multiagent systems: A motion planning approach,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 85, pp. 54–60, 2015.
10.
Y. Cao, W. Yu, W. Ren, and G. Chen, “An overview of recent progress in the study of distributed multi-agent coordination,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial informatics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 427–438, 2013.
11.
Z. Yang, J. Xiang, and Y. Li, “Distributed consensus based supply-demand balance algorithm for economic dispatch problem in a smart grid with switching graph,” IEEE Trans. on Indust. Electronics, 2016.
12.
S. Rao and D. Ghose, “Sliding mode control-based autopilots for leaderless consensus of unmanned aerial vehicles,” IEEE transactions on control systems technology, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1964–1972, 2014.
13.
W. Ren, “Distributed leaderless consensus algorithms for networked euler-lagrange systems,” Intl. J. of Control, vol. 82, no. 11, 2009.
14.
J. Han and Y. Chen, “Multiple uav formations for cooperative source seeking and contour mapping of a radiative signal field,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 74, no. 1-2, pp. 323–332, 2014.
15.
J. A. Guerrero, P. Castillo, S. Salazar, and R. Lozano, “Mini rotorcraft flight formation control using bounded inputs,” Journal of intelligent & robotic systems, vol. 65, no. 1-4, pp. 175–186, 2012.
16.
Q. Song, J. Cao, and W. Yu, “Second-order leader-following consensus of nonlinear multi-agent systems via pinning control,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 553–562, 2010.
17.
L. Xu, H. Fan, Z. Dong, and W. Wang, “Robust consensus control for leader-following multi-agent system under switching topologies,” in Intl. Conf. on Cybernetics, Robotics and Control. IEEE, 2016.
18.
A. Drak, M. Hejase, M. ElShorbagy, A. Wahyudie, and H. Noura, “Autonomous formation flight algorithm and platform for quadrotor uavs,” Intl. J. of Robotics & Mech., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 124–132, 2014.
19.
T. Namerikawa, Y. Kuriki, and A. Khalifa, “Consensus-based cooperative formation control for multiquadcopter system with unidirectional network connections,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, vol. 140, no. 4, p. 044502, 2018.
20.
N. Nigam, S. Bieniawski, I. Kroo, and J. Vian, “Control of multiple uavs for persistent surveillance: algorithm and flight test results,” IEEE Trans. on Cont. Systems Tech., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1236–1251, 2012.
21.
J. Han, Y. Xu, L. Di, and Y. Chen, “Low-cost multi-uav technologies for contour mapping of nuclear radiation field,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 70, no. 1-4, pp. 401–410, 2013.
22.
H. Rastgoftar and E. M. Atkins, “Cooperative aerial payload transport guided by an in situ human supervisor,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, no. 99, pp. 1–16, 2018.
23.
H. Rastgoftar and S. Jayasuriya, “Evolution of multi-agent systems as continua,” J. Dynamic Sys., Meas., & Control, vol. 136, no. 4, 2014.
24.
W. M. Lai, D. H. Rubin, D. Rubin, and E. Krempl, Introduction to continuum mechanics. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2009.
25.
H. Rastgoftar, H. G. Kwatny, and E. M. Atkins, “Asymptotic tracking and robustness of mas transitions under a new communication topology,” IEEE Trans. on Automation Science and Engineering, 2016.
26.
P. Holoborodko, “Smooth noise robust differentiators,” http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/numerical-methods/numerical-derivative/smooth-low-noise-differentiators/, 2008.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.