Improving student engagement in higher education through mobile-based interactive teaching model using socrative | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Improving student engagement in higher education through mobile-based interactive teaching model using socrative


Abstract:

One of the main problem in higher education teaching is low students' levels of engagement leading to poor learning performance. Broad teaching strategies, methods and to...Show More

Abstract:

One of the main problem in higher education teaching is low students' levels of engagement leading to poor learning performance. Broad teaching strategies, methods and tools are developed over the years to address this concern. In recent years, with the increasing numbers of students accessing the internet using mobile devices, there has been growing interest in embracing the mobile technology in teaching to improve the student participation in the classroom. This research describes the design and implementation of a mobile-based interactive teaching model with in-class and off-class components aided by Socrative online audience response system to improve students' engagement in a private university in Malaysia. A total of 45 students from undergraduate computing course had participated in this experimental study. The activities such as polls, exercises, quizzes and games was used to stimulate the discussion and encourage two ways communication between instructor and students. Both qualitative and quantitative data comprises of students' feedbacks, academic results, attendance records and instructor's teaching evaluation scores are analyzed. The results show that students were strongly positive with the use of Socrative and felt that they were more engaged. This interactive model has successfully enhanced students' learning experience and improved students' academic performance. The outcome of this study would contributes to current evidence of the efficacy of using mobile technology in higher education teaching.
Date of Conference: 25-28 April 2017
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 08 June 2017
ISBN Information:
Electronic ISSN: 2165-9567
Conference Location: Athens, Greece
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Improving students' engagement is a challenge faced by many institutions in the higher education sector. Many pedagogical researchers believe that low engagement in classroom will lead to negative impact in achieving the learning outcome, hence tremendous efforts and focus have been put in this research area over the decades [1].

Select All
1.
L. Taylor and J. Parsons, "Improving Student Engagement", Curr. Issues Eudcation, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-33, 2011.
2.
H. Poll, Pearson student mobile device survey 2015, 2015.
3.
F. Onyechere Ugochukwu and M. Z. Ismail, "The future of BYOD in organizations and higher institution of learning", Int. Journals Accounting Bus. Manag., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-5, 2015.
4.
I. Pogar, M. Gligora and V. Davidovi, "BYOD: a challenge for the future digital generation", 36th International Conventionon Information and Communication Technology Electronics and Microelectronics MIPRO 2013 - Proceedings, pp. 748-752, 2013.
5.
B. Martinez and H. Seli, "Just-in-Time or Plenty-of-Time teaching? Different electronic feedback devices and their effect on student engagement", J. Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 17, no. 2.
6.
A. O. Agbatogun, "Developing learners second language communicative competence through active learning: Clickers or communicative approach?", Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 257-269, 2014.
7.
E. Bojinova and J. Oigara, "Teaching and learning with Clickers in higher education", Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 154-165, 2013.
8.
S. Simelane and A. Mji, "Impact of technology-engagement teaching strategy with the aid of Clickers on students learning style", Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 136, pp. 511-521, 2014.
9.
E. D. Bojinova and J. N. Oigara, "Teaching and learning with Clickers: Are Clickers good for students?", Interdiscip. J. E-Learning Learn. Objects, vol. 7, pp. 169-184, 2011.
10.
P. Dervan, "Increasing in-class student engagement using Socrative (an online student response system)", All Irel. J. Teach. Learn. High., vol. 6, pp. 1977, 2014.
11.
M. Kastner, "The use of an audience response system to monitor students knowledge level in real-time its impact on grades and students experiences", Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 104-113, 2016.
12.
T. Surentheran, "Use of an electronic voting system to facilitate interactive engagement and enhance active learning of undergraduate students in biomedical science" in Investig. Univ. Teach. Learn., spring, vol. 9, pp. 111-121, 2014.
13.
About Poll Everywhere, [online] Available: https://www.polleverywhere.com/about.
14.
W. M. Kappers, "Poll Everywhere! Even in the classroom: An investigation into the impact of using PollEverywhere in a large-lecture classroom", 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2014.
15.
R. GréGory, How technology breeds innovation in the educational systems, [online] Available: https://www.pentalog.com/blog/it-services/socrative-startup-boston-usa/.
16.
M. F. Tretinjak, A. Bednjanec and M. Tretinjak, "Interactive teaching with Socrative", 38th International Conventionon Information and Communication Technology Electronics and Microelectronics MIPRO 2015 - Proceedings, pp. 848-851, 2015.
17.
D. M. Coca, "Software Socrative and smartphones as tools for implementation of basic processes of active physics learning in classroom: An initial feasibility study with prospective teachers", Eur. J Phys. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 17-28, 2013.
18.
P. Wash, "Taking advantage of mobile devices: Using Socrative in the classroom", J. Teach. Learn. with Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 99-101, 2014.
19.
F. H. Altaany and K. A. Alsoudani, "Impact of using socrative for student in Irbid national university", Proceeding of the 3rd Global Summit on Education GSE 2015, pp. 223-230, 2015.
20.
A. Ooms, T. Linsey, M. Webb and A. Panayiotidis, "The in-classroom use of mobile technologies to support diagnostic and formative assessment and feedback", 7th London International Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Conference, pp. 9, 2008.
21.
J. Stuart and R. J. D. Rutherford, "Medical student concentration during lectures", Lancet, vol. 312, no. 8088, pp. 514-516, 1978.
22.
C. Viegas, G. Alves and N. Lima, "Formative assessment diversity to foster students engagement", 2015 Int. Conf. Interact. Colla b. Learn., pp. 929-935, 2015.
23.
D. Malandrino, I. Manno, G. Palmieri, V. Scarano and G. Filatrella, "How quiz-based tools can improve students engagement and participation in the classroom", 2014 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), pp. 379-386, 2014.
24.
G. Sprint and D. Cook, "Enhancing the CS1 student experience with gamification", ISEC 2015 − 5th IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference, pp. 94-99, 2015.
25.
B. Herbert, D. Charles, A. Moore and T. Charles, "An investigation of gamification typologies for enhancing learner motivation", 2014 International Conference on Interactive Technologies and Games (iTAG), pp. 71-78, 2014.
26.
A. Bartel and G. Hagel, "Engaging students with a mobile game-based learning system in university education", Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) 2014 IEEE, pp. 957-960, 2014.
27.
C. Jacobs, M. Wilson and C. Barker, "Using the latest developments in mobile technology to improve students engagement with assessment feedback", 2015 International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL), no. November, pp. 124-126, 2015.
28.
M. Price, K. Handley, J. Millar and B. ODonovan, "Feedback: all that effort but what is the effect?", Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 277-289, 2010.
29.
H. J. Parkin, S. Hepplestone, G. Holden, B. Irwin, L. Thorpe, S. H. Helen, et al., "A role for technology in enhancing students engagement with feedback", Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 963-973, 2012.
Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.