Dynamic Clustering and User Association in Wireless Small-Cell Networks With Social Considerations | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Dynamic Clustering and User Association in Wireless Small-Cell Networks With Social Considerations


Abstract:

In this paper, a novel social network-aware user association in wireless small cell networks with underlaid deviceto-device (D2D) communication is investigated. The propo...Show More

Abstract:

In this paper, a novel social network-aware user association in wireless small cell networks with underlaid deviceto-device (D2D) communication is investigated. The proposed approach exploits strategic social relationships between user equipments (TIEs) and their physical proximity to optimize the overall network performance. This problem is formulated as a matching game between TIEs and their serving nodes (SNs) in which, an SN can be a small cell base station (SCBS) or an important UE with D2D capabilities. The problem is cast as a many-to-one matching game in which TIEs and SNs rank one another using preference relations that capture both the wireless aspects (i.e., received signal strength, traffic load, etc.) and users' social ties (e.g., TIE proximity and social distance). Due to the combinatorial nature of the network-wide TIE-SN matching, the problem is decomposed into a dynamic clustering problem in which SCBSs are grouped into disjoint clusters based on mutual interference. Subsequently, an TIE-SN matching game is carried out per cluster. The game under consideration is shown to belong to a class of matching games with externalities arising from interference and peer effects due to users social distance, enabling TIEs and SNs to interact with one another until reaching a stable matching. Simulation results show that the proposed social-aware user association approach yields significant performance gains, reaching up to 26%, 24%, and 31% for 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles for TIE throughputs, respectively, as compared to the classical social-unaware baseline.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology ( Volume: 66, Issue: 7, July 2017)
Page(s): 6553 - 6568
Date of Publication: 23 December 2016

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

The proliferation of bandwidth intensive wireless applications such as multimedia streaming and online social networking has led to a tremendous increase in wireless spectral resources [1] . This increasing need for wireless capacity mandates novel cellular architectures for delivering high quality-of-service (QoS) in a cost-effective manner. In this respect, small cell networks (SCNs), built on the premise of deploying inexpensive, low-power small cell base stations (SCBSs) are seen as a key technique to boost wireless capacity and offloading traffic. Reaping the benefits of SCNs requires overcoming a number of challenges that include user association, traffic offloading, resource management, among others [1] –[4]. Along with the rapid proliferation of SCNs, cellular systems are moving from a base station to a user-centric architecture driven by the surge of user specific applications [5]. It is anticipated that a large number of devices with varying QoS requirements will interact within small coverage footprints [6]. Hence, in conjunction with SCNs, device-to-device (D2D) communication over cellular bands has emerged as a promising technique to further improve the performance of SCNs, in which D2D devices communicate directly bypassing the infrastructure yielding increased network capacity, extended coverage, enhanced data offload and improved energy efficiency [6]–[11]. The 3GPP LTE Release 12 has dealt with D2D communication in order to address the ever-increasing demands for data traffic.

Select All
1.
A. Anpalagan, M. Bennis, and R. Vannithamby, Design and Deployment of Small Cell Networks. Cambridge, U.K. : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015.
2.
J. Andrews, H. Claussen, M. Dohler, S. Rangan, and M. Reed, “Femtocells: Past, present, and future,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol.  30, no.  3, pp.  497–508, Apr. 2012.
3.
D. Lopez-Perez, I. Guvenc, G. de la Roche, M. Kountouris, T. Q. Quek, and J. Zhang, “Enhanced inter-cell interference coordination challenges in heterogeneous networks,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Mag., vol.  18, no.  3, pp.  22–30, Jun. 2011.
4.
G. de la Roche, A. Valcarce, D. Lopez-Perez, and J. Zhang, “Access control mechanisms for femtocells,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol.  48, no.  1, pp.  33–39, Jan. 2010.
5.
M. Bennis, M. Simsek, A. Czylwik, W. Saad, S. Valentin, and M. Debbah, “When cellular meets WiFi in wireless small cell networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag. vol.  51, no.  6, pp.  44–50, Jun. 2013.
6.
F. Boccardi, R. W. Heath Jr., A. Lozano, T. L. Marzetta, and P. Popovski, “Five disruptive technology directions for 5G,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol.  52, no.  2, pp.  74–80, Feb. 2014.
7.
A. Asadi, Q. Wang, and V. Mancuso, “A survey on device-to-device communication in cellular networks,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol.  16, no.  4, pp.  1801–1819, Fourth Quarter 2014.
8.
G. Fodor, E. Dahlman, G. Mildh, S. Parkvall, N. Reider, G. Miklós, and Z. Turányi, “Design aspects of network assisted device-to-device communications,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol.  50, no.  3, pp.  170–177, Mar. 2012.
9.
L. Song, Z. Han, and C. Xu, Resource Management for Device-to-Device Underlay Communication (Springer Briefs in Computer Science). New York, NY, USA : Springer, 2014, p. 79.
10.
Y. Pei and Y. Liang, “Resource allocation for device-to-device communications overlaying two-way cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol.  12, no.  7, pp.  3611–3621, Jul. 2013.
11.
J. Li, J. B. Song, and Z. Han, “Network connectivity optimization for device-to-device wireless system with femtocells,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol.  62, no.  7, pp.  3098–3109, Sep. 2013.
12.
N. Dimitriou, A. Zalonis, A. Polydoros, A. Kliks, and O. Holland, “Context-aware radio resource management in HetNets,” in Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf. Workshops, Istanbul, Turkey, Apr. 2014, pp.  93–98.
13.
M. Proebster, M. Kaschub, and S. Valentin, “Context-aware resource allocation to improve the quality of service of heterogeneous traffic,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., Kyoto, Japan, Jun. 2011, pp.  1–6.
14.
M. Proebster, M. Kaschub, T. Werthmann, and S. Valentin, “Context-aware resource allocation for cellular wireless networks,” EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw., vol.  2012, no. 1, pp. 1–19, Dec. 2012.
15.
L. Xu, Y. Chen, K. K. Chai, J. Schromans, and L. Cuthbert, “Self-organizing cluster-based cooperative load balancing in OFDMA cellular networks,” Wireless Commun. Mobile Comput., vol.  15, no.  7, pp.  1171–1187, Jul. 2013, DOI: 10.1002/wcm.2394.
16.
O. Anjum, C. Wijting, M. A. Uusitalo, and K. Valkealahti, “On the performance of decentralized cell edge coordinated scheduling in small cell clusters with different densities,” in Proc. IEEE Eur. Conf. Netw. Commun., Bologna, Italy, Jun. 2014, pp.  1–5.
17.
A. Abdelnasser, E. Hossain, and D. I. Kim, “Clustering and resource allocation for dense femtocells in a two-tier cellular OFDMA network,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol.  13, no.  3, pp.  1628–1641, Mar. 2014.
18.
K. Hosseini, H. Dahrouj, and R. Adev, “Distributed clustering and interference management in two-tier networks,” in Proc. IEEE Global Telecommun. Conf., Anaheim, CA, USA, Dec. 2012, pp.  4267–4272.
19.
Y. Xiao, K. C. Chen, C. Yuen, Z. Han, and L. A. DaSilva, “A Bayesian overlapping coalition formation game for device-to-device spectrum sharing in cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol.  14, no.  7, pp.  4034–4051, Jul. 2015.
20.
Y. Shen, C. Jiang, T. Q. S. Quek. and Y. Ren, “Device-to-device-assisted communications in cellular networks: An energy efficient approach in downlink video sharing scenario,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol.  15, no.  2, pp.  1575–1587, Feb. 2016.
21.
A. Roth and M. A. O. Sotomayor, Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis. Cambridge, U.K. : Cambridge Univ., Mar. 1992.
22.
D. F. Manlove, Algorithmics of Matching Under Preferences. Singapore : World Scientific, 2013.
23.
K. Bando, “Many-to-one matching markets with externalities among firms,” J. Math. Econ., vol.  48, no.  1, pp.  14–20, 2012.
24.
E. A. Jorswieck, “Stable matchings for resource allocation in wireless networks,” in Proc. IEEE 17th Int. Conf. Digit. Signal Process., Corfu, Greece, Jul. 2011, pp.  1–8.
25.
S. Bayat, R. H. Y. Louie, Z. Han, Y. Li, and B. Vucetic, “Multiple operator and multiple femtocell networks: Distributed stable matching,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., Ottawa, ON, Canada, Jun. 2012, pp.  5140–5145.
26.
A. Leshem, E. Zehavi, and Y. Yaffe, “Multichannel opportunistic carrier sensing for stable channel access control in cognitive radio systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol.  30, no.  1, pp.  82–95, Jan. 2012.
27.
Y. H. Yang, Y. Chen, C. Jiang, C. Y. Wang, and K. J. R. Liu, “Wireless access network selection game with negative network externality,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol.  12, no.  10, pp.  5048–5060, Oct. 2013.
28.
C. Jiang, Y. Chen, Y. Gao, and K. J. Ray Liu, “Indian buffet game with negative network externality and non-Bayesian social learning,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., Syst., vol.  45, no.  4, pp.  609–623, Apr. 2015.
29.
V. N. Ha and L. B. Le, “Fair resource allocation for OFDMA femtocell networks with macrocell protection,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol.  63, no.  3, pp.  1388–1401, Apr. 2014.
30.
U. Brandes, “On variants of shortest-path betweenness centrality and their generic computation,” Soc. Netw. vol.  30, no.  2, pp.  136–145, 2008.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.