Testing of Advanced Driver Assistance Towards Automated Driving: A Survey and Taxonomy on Existing Approaches and Open Questions | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Testing of Advanced Driver Assistance Towards Automated Driving: A Survey and Taxonomy on Existing Approaches and Open Questions


Abstract:

In this work, we propose a novel taxonomy to partition the problem of testing advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) into three basic dimensions. These dimensions are ...Show More

Abstract:

In this work, we propose a novel taxonomy to partition the problem of testing advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) into three basic dimensions. These dimensions are detailed and confirmed with recent research. Our framework permits the consideration of open research questions which have to be answered to pave the way for future highly automated driving. Despite the importance of this problem, a similarly comprehensive and structured survey has to the best of the authors' knowledge not been developed before.
Date of Conference: 15-18 September 2015
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 02 November 2015
ISBN Information:

ISSN Information:

Conference Location: Gran Canaria, Spain
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) feature an increasing degree of automation towards the goal of fully automated driving for safe and comfortable travel. This trend promises a reduction in the number and severity of traffic accidents, of traffic congestions as well as fuel consumption and thus leads to resource-saving mobility.

Select All
1.
K. Bengler, K. Dietmayer, B. Farber, M. Maurer, C. Stiller, and H. Winner, “Three decades of driver assistance systems: Review and future perspectives,” Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, IEEE, vol. 6, pp. 6–22, winter 2014.
2.
IEEE, “610.12-1990 - IEEE standard glossary of software engineering terminology,” 1990.
3.
O. J. Gietelink, Design and validation of advanced driver assistance systems. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, 2007.
4.
S. Ebel, U. Wilhelm, A. Grimm, and U. Sailer, “Wie sicher ist sicher genug? Anforderungen an die funktionale Unzulanglichkeit von Fahrerassistenzsystemen in Anlehnung an das gesellschaftlich akzeptierte Risiko,” in 6. Workshop Fahrerassistenzsysteme, 2009.
5.
S. Fabris, J. D. Miller, and J. Luo, “Validation of an aeb system,” in 3rd International Symposium on Road Vehicles Functional Safety Standards and Its Application, ( Xian, China ), 2014.
6.
T. Helmer, Development of a Methodology for the Evaluation of Active Safety using the Example of Preventive Pedestrian Protection. PhD thesis, Technische Universitat, Berlin, 2014.
7.
V. Mariano, J. Min, J.-H. Park, R. Kasturi, D. Mihalcik, H. Li, D. Doermann, and T. Drayer, “Performance evaluation of object detection algorithms,” in Pattern Recognition, 2002. Proceedings. 16th International Conference on, vol. 3, pp. 965–969, 2002.
8.
M. Brahmi, “Reference systems for environmental perception,” in Automotive Systems Engineering ( M. Maurer and H. Winner, eds. ), pp. 205–221, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.
9.
K. Smith, R. Schweiger, W. Ritter, and J.-E. Kallhammer, “Develop-ment and evaluation of a performance metric for image-based driver assistance systems,” in Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2011 IEEE, pp. 381–386, 2011.
10.
J. Fritsch, T. Kuhnl, and A. Geiger, “A new performance measure and evaluation benchmark for road detection algorithms,” in Intelligent Transportation Systems - (ITS C), 16th International IEEE Conference on, pp. 1693–1700, 2013.
11.
P. Marquez-Valle, D. Gil, and A. Hernandez-Sabate, “Evaluation of the capabilities of confidence measures for assessing optical flow quality,” in Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, pp. 624–631, 2013.
12.
D. Scharstein and R. Szeliski, “A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms,” Int. 1. Comput. Vision, vol. 47, no. 1-3, pp. 7–42, 2002.
13.
S. Morales, Y. Woo, R. Klette, and T. Vaudrey, “A study on stereo and motion data accuracy for a moving platform,” in Advances in Robotics, vol. 5744 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 292–300, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
14.
A. Kapp, “Quality measures for lidar signal processing,” in Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2006 IEEE, pp. 163–168, 2006.
15.
B. Grabe, T. Ike, and M. Hoetter, “Evaluation method of grid based representation from sensor data,” in Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2009 IEEE, pp. 1245–1250, 2009.
16.
M. Stampfle, D. Holz, and J. Becker, “Performance evaluation of automotive sensor data fusion,” in Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE, pp. 50–55, 2005.
17.
B. Ristic, B.-N. Vo, D. Clark, and B.- T. Vo, “A metric for performance evaluation of multi-target tracking algorithms,” Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 3452–3457, 2011.
18.
R. Schubert, H. Kloden, G. Wanielik, and S. Kalberer, “Performance evaluation of multiple target tracking in the absence of reference data,” in Information Fusion (FUSION), 13th Conference on, pp. 1–7, 2010.
19.
S. N. R. Meister, On Creating Reference Data for Performance Analysis in Image Processing. PhD thesis, University of Heidelberg, 2014.
20.
D. Pfeiffer, S. Morales, A. Barth, and U. Franke, “Ground truth evaluation of the stixel representation using laser scanners,” in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2010 13th International IEEE Conference on, pp. 1091–1097, 2010.
21.
T. Tatschke, F.-J. Farber, E. Fuchs, L. Walchshausl, and R. Lindl, “Semi-autonomous reference data generation for perception performance evaluation,” in Information Fusion, 2007 10th International Conference on, pp. 1–7, 2007.
22.
F. de Ponte Muller, L. Navajas, and T. Strang, “Characterization of a laser scanner sensor for the use as a reference system in vehicular relative positioning,” in Communication Technologies for Vehicles, vol. 7865 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 146–158, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.
23.
D. M. Kirchhofer, C. Uhlmann, L. Beste, B. Reib, and T. Brandmeier, “Automated object labelling for advanced driver assistance systems using a camera-and a lidar-system,” in 12th International Symposium and Exhibition on Sophisticated Car Occupant Safety Systems, 2014.
24.
J. Klandt, M. Radimirsch, A. Kirchner, and H. Philipps, “Referen-zierung von Fahrerassistenzsystemen. Mess-und Auswertesysteme fuer die Umfelderfassung,” VDI-Berichte, no. 2166, 2012.
25.
A. Geiger, P. Lenz, and R. Urtasun, “Are we ready for autonomous driving? the kitti vision benchmark suite,” in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE Conference on, pp. 3354–3361, 2012.
26.
Z. Liu and R. Klette, “Approximated ground truth for stereo and motion analysis on real-world sequences,” in Advances in Image and Video Technology, vol. 5414 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 874–885, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
27.
N. Schneider, S. Gehrig, D. Pfeiffer, and K. Banitsas, “An evaluation framework for stereo-based driver assistance,” in Real-World Scene Analysis 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, p. 2751, 2012.
28.
R. Nair, S. Meister, M. Lambers, M. Balda, H. Hofmann, A. Kolb, D. Kondermann, and B. Jahne, “Ground truth for evaluating time of flight imaging,” in Time-of-Flight and Depth Imaging. Sensors, Algorithms, and Applications, vol. 8200 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 52–74, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.
29.
S. Zeng, “Performance evaluation of automotive radars using carrier-phase differential GPS,” Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 59, pp. 2732–2741, Oct 2010.
30.
B. Strasser, A. Siegel, K.-H. Siedersberger, M. Maurer, and H. Bubb, “Vernetzung von Test-und Simulationsmethoden fur die Entwicklung von Fahrerassistenzsystemen (FAS),” in 4. Tagung Aktive Sicherheit durch Fahrerassistenz; 2010.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.