Loading [MathJax]/extensions/TeX/mhchem.js
Effective BigData-Space Service Selection over Trust and Heterogeneous QoS Preferences | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Effective BigData-Space Service Selection over Trust and Heterogeneous QoS Preferences


Abstract:

As the number of Cloud services is growing at a tremendous speed, there is an increasing number of service providers offering similar functionalities. Selecting services ...Show More

Abstract:

As the number of Cloud services is growing at a tremendous speed, there is an increasing number of service providers offering similar functionalities. Selecting services with user desired non-functional properties (NFPs) becomes of significant importance but triggers a number of Big Data related research issues. First, the selection decision should deal with a large volume of service NFPs data. Second, service selection needs to reflect diverse user preferences, including both qualitative and quantitative ones. Third, the uncertainty of the network and service load leads to high variability in NFPs. Fourth, as the trust values of service NFPs are collected via historic user's feedbacks,it brings the veracity dimension to the NFPs of services. Fifth, multiple and sometimes conflicting decision objectives for optimal service selection should be balanced. An effective service selection mechanism is in demand that can tackle all the above Big Data challenges in an integrated way to handle the highly diverse QoS with significant variability along with the trust related issues giving rise to data veracity. Existing investigations focus on either users' QoS preferences or their trust concerns but fail to provide a systematic solution to integrate both criteria in the selection process. In this paper, we tackle heterogeneous preference- and trust-based service selection by developing a novel multi-objective optimization approach to make trade-off decision between service's trust value and user's QoS preference to rank candidate Cloud services based on their match degrees with users' requirements. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed approach.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Services Computing ( Volume: 11, Issue: 4, 01 July-Aug. 2018)
Page(s): 644 - 657
Date of Publication: 22 September 2015

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

Select All
1.
X. Huang, “usageqos: Estimating the QoS of web services through online user communities, ” ACM Trans. Web, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1, 2013.
2.
Z. Wan, F. J. Meng, J. M. Xu, and P. Wang, “Service composition pattern generation for cloud migration: A graph similarity analysis approach, ” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Web Serv., 2014, pp. 321–328.
3.
W. Dou, X. Zhang, J. Liu, and J. Chen, “Hiresome-ii: Towards privacy-aware cross-cloud service composition for big data applications, ” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 455–466, Feb. 2015.
4.
Z. Ye, A. Bouguettaya, and X. Zhou, “Economic model-driven cloud service composition, ” ACM Trans. Internet Technol., vol. 14, no. 2-3, pp. 20, 2014.
5.
S. Dustdar, R. Pichler, V. Savenkov, and H.-L. Truong, “Quality-aware service-oriented data integration: Requirements, state of the art and open challenges, ” ACM SIGMOD Rec., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2012.
6.
L. Sun, H. Dong, F. K. Hussain, O. K. Hussain, and E. Chang, “Cloud service selection: State-of-the-art and future research directions, ” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 45, pp. 134–150, 2014.
7.
C. R. Rivero and H. M. Jamil, “Towards a novel model for distributed big data service composition using functional graph matching, ” in Proc. IEEE Int. Congress Big Data, 2014, pp. 794–795.
8.
A. V. Dastjerdi and R. Buyya, “Compatibility-aware cloud service composition under fuzzy preferences of users, ” IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2014.
9.
A. Bouguettaya, S. Nepal, W. Sherchan, X. Zhou, J. Wu, S. Chen, D. Liu, L. Li, H. Wang, and X. Liu, “End-to-end service support for mashups, ” IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 250–263, Jul.-Sep. 2010.
10.
Q. Yu, “Sparse functional representation for large scale service clustering, ” in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Serv.-Oriented Comput., 2012, pp. 468–483.
11.
N. Limam and R. Boutaba, “Assessing software service quality and trustworthiness at selection time, ” IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 559–574, Jul./Aug. 2010.
12.
M. Mehdi, N. Bouguila, and J. Bentahar, “Trust and reputation of web services through qos correlation lens (early access article), ” IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput., 2015, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber= 7094317=true=Trust%20and%20Reputation%20of%20Web%20services% 20Through%20QoS%20Correlation%20Lens, Doi: 10.1109/TSC.2015.2426185.
13.
Y. Liu, A. H. H. Ngu, and L. Zeng, “Qos computation and policing in dynamic web service selection, ” in Proc. 13th Int. Conf. World Wide Web, 2004, pp. 66–73.
14.
D. A. DMello and V. S. Ananthanarayana, “Dynamic selection mechanism for quality of service aware web services, ” Enterprise IS, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 23–60, 2010.
15.
C.-W. Hang and M. P. Singh, “Trustworthy service selection and composition, ” ACM Trans. Autonom. Adaptive Syst., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 5, 2011.
16.
L. Li, Y. Wang, et al., “Subjective trust inference in composite services, ” in Proc. AAAI, 2010, pp. 1377–1384.
17.
T. Wu, W. Dou, C. Hu, and J. Chen, “Service mining for trusted service composition in Cross-cloud environment (early access article), ” IEEE Syst. J., 2014, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber= 6948332=true=Service%20mining%20for%20trusted% 20service%20composition%20in%20Cross-cloud%20environment, Doi : 10.1109/JSYST.2014.2361841.
18.
Z. Noorian, M. Fleming, and S. Marsh, “Preference-oriented Qos-based service discovery with dynamic trust and reputation management, ” in Proc. 27th Annu. ACM Symp. Appl. Comput., 2012, pp. 2014–2021.
19.
H. Gao, J. Yan, and Y. Mu, “Trust-oriented QoS-aware composite service selection based on genetic algorithms, ” Concurrency Comput.: Practice Exp., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 500–515, 2014.
20.
B. Ye, A. Pervez, M. Ghavami, and M. Nekovee, “A Trust-based model for quality of web service, ” in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Adv. Serv. Comput., 2013, pp. 39–45.
21.
M. Palmonari, M. Comerio, and F. De Paoli, “Effective and flexible Nfp-based ranking of web services, ” in Proc. 7th Int. Joint Conf. Serv.-Oriented Comput., 2009, pp. 546–560.
22.
S. Lamparter, A. Ankolekar, R. Studer, and S. Grimm, “Preference-based selection of highly configurable web services, ” in Proc. 16th Int. Conf. World Wide Web, 2007, pp. 1013–1022.
23.
J. E. Hadad, M. Manouvrier, and M. Rukoz, “TQOS: Transactional and QoS-aware selection algorithm for automatic web service composition, ” IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 73–85, Jan.-Mar. 2010.
24.
L. Zeng, B. Benatallah, A. H. Ngu, M. Dumas, J. Kalagnanam, and H. Chang, “Qos-aware middleware for web services composition, ” IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 311–327, May 2004.
25.
O. A. Wahab, J. Bentahar, H. Otrok, and A. Mourad, “A survey on trust and reputation models for web services: Single, composite, and communities, ” Decision Support Syst., vol. 74, pp. 121–134, 2015.
26.
J. Bentahar, B. Khosravifar, M. A. Serhani, and M. Alishahi, “On the analysis of reputation for agent-based web services, ” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 39, no. 16, pp. 12 438–12 450, 2012.
27.
C. Hang and M. Singh, “Selecting trustworthy service in Service-oriented environments, ” in Proc. 12th AAMAS Workshop Trust Agent Societies, 2009, pp. 1–12.
28.
E. Maximilien and M. Singh, “Toward autonomic web services trust and selection, ” in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Serv. Oriented Comput., 2004, pp. 212–221.
29.
G. Liu, Y. Wang, M. A. Orgun, and E.-P. Lim, “Finding the optimal social trust path for the selection of trustworthy service providers in complex social networks, ” IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 152–167, Apr. 2013.
30.
Y. Wang and J. Vassileva, “Toward trust and reputation based web service selection: A survey, ” Int. Trans. Syst. Sci. Appl., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 118–132, 2007.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.