In metallic systems, conduction electrons undergo plasmon oscillations and can propagate along the metal surface at
optical frequencies due to the excitation of surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) or localized surface plasmon resonances
(LSPRs)
[1]–
[6]. Enhanced optical transmission (EOT), since firstly being found in the
metal film perforated with subwavelength hole arrays, has attracted lots of attention due to its potential applications
in optoelectronic field
[7],
[8]. Originally, the excitation of SPPs has been believed to be one main reason
for EOT due to the match between the wavelength of SPPs and the period of aperture arrays
[3]. Recently, LSPRs have also been found to play an important role on EOT
[9],
[10] in metal nanostructures with periodic hole arrays such as circular,
rectangular, triangular, and compound holes due to their unique properties such as the capability of overcoming the
diffraction limit, miniaturized size, and strong optical field confinement
[11]–
[13]. So far, many devices based on LSPRs or SPPs have been realized both
theoretically and experimentally, such as plasmonic filters, sensors, and waveguides
[14]–
[17]. However, many nanostructures with simple hole arrays can't obtain high
transmission or can't realize the consistence between the simulation and experiment in the optical regime. Metallic
nanostructures with compound holes generally offer higher coupling efficiency than those with simple circular or
rectangular apertures due to the excitation and coupling of LSPRs and SPPs
[18]–
[23]. For example, Wang
et al. have obtained perfect transmission in the gigahertz region via a structure of double sets of
circular holes arranged into a rectangular array
[20]. Liu
et al. have achieved the tunable high optical transmission in the compound subwavelength hole arrays
[18]. However, the fabrication of metallic nanostructures with complicated
compound holes is usually difficult, which greatly limits their practical applications. Therefore, metallic
nanostructures with simple compound hole arrays, which are easy to realize, are more desired to achieve the tunable and
prominent EOT for the applications in integrated nanophotonic circuits and optoelectronic devices.
In this paper, a simple metallic nanostructure consisting of a silver (Ag) perforated with an array of compound
rectangular holes is theoretically proposed and investigated by using three-dimensional finite-difference time-domain
(FDTD) method. The compound rectangular nanohole in such a structure consists of a large square hole with two smaller
rectangular holes symmetrically distributed at its both sides. Due to the employment of symmetrical small rectangular
holes at both sides of the large holes with nanometer's separated distance, strong near-field coupling of LSPRs
appears. As a result, EOT with more than 90% transmission intensity is obtained in the visible region, larger than
those observed in the metallic nanostructures perforated with conventional hole arrays but without considering the
near-field coupling effect of LSPRs
[7],
[8]. The obtained EOT mainly originates from the excitation of LSPRs in the
nanoholes and SPPs on metal surface and the strong near-field coupling of LSPRs
[9],
[10],
[18]. In addition, obvious optical responses to the structure parameters and
environmental refractive index suggest the tunability and sensitivity of EOT property in our proposed structure. These
findings imply that our structure has potential applications such as plasmonic filters and sensors.
SECTION 3.
Results and Discussion
Firstly, we investigated the transmission spectra of the metal films respectively perforated with the large hole
array (square holes with size of
D, black line), the small hole array (square holes with size of
a, red line)
, and the compound hole array proposed in this work (blue line), as shown in
Fig. 2. Here,
D = 100\ {\rm nm},
a = b = 50\ {\rm nm}, and
p = 400\ {\rm nm}. As reported in our previous work
[19], the Ag film with 50 nm in thickness is opacity to light. After
perforating the Ag film with nanoholes, obvious transmission enhancement in the optical regime is observed in these
three structures. When there is a small hole array (or a large hole array) in the Ag film, the maximum transmission
intensity is 18% (or 55%). Surprisingly, by integrating the large and small holes together as shown
Fig. 1, the transmission intensity is largely enhanced. The maximum
transmission (85%) is even larger than the sum of those of the two structures mentioned above, indicating that our
proposed structure in
Fig. 1 can offer higher coupling efficiency. As reported before, for the
metal film perforated with an array of apertures under normal incidence, the excitation of SPPs on metal film surface
contributes to the EOT phenomena
[1]. The excitation of SPPs can directly couple light into the structures and
then further excite the LSPRs at the edges of holes
[9]. The excited LSPRs in the nanoholes can transfer the energy from the top
surface to the bottom surface of the structure and then re-radiate at the opposite film interface
[23]. The nanoholes in such structures can also be regarded as
Fabry-Férot (FP) resonant cavities with both ends open
[21]. When the spread of surface plasmons satisfies a certain phase condition,
the holes achieve maximum transmittance
[21]. For the Ag film perforated with the simple rectangular hole array, the
interaction between adjacent holes can be ignored due to the large distance between them
[3]. Therefore, their low transmission intensities observed in
Fig. 2 mainly originate from the excitation of SPPs on metal surface and
LSPRs in nanoholes and the FP resonant effects of holes. While for the proposed structure, the nanometer's separated
distance between the adjacent large and small holes (25 nm) contributes to the near-field coupling of LSPRs between
them. Therefore, it can be concluded that the strong near-filed coupling of LSPRs between the large and small holes
results in the largely enhancement of transmission intensity of the proposed structure, which might provide promising
applications in integrated optoelectronic devices.
In order to understand the physical mechanism of the EOT obtained in the proposed structure, we then focused on the
effects of nanohole sizes on the transmission spectra.
Fig. 3(a) shows the transmission evolution process by varying the width (
b) of small rectangles. Here,
D = 100\ {\rm nm},
a = 50\ {\rm nm}
. The transmission peak shows a red-shift from 522 nm to 617 nm with
b increasing from 50 to 80 nm with a step of 10 nm, accompanied
by an increased intensity from 85% to 92%. As
b increases from 50 nm to 80 nm, the Ag spacer thickness between
the adjacent large and small holes decreases from 25 nm to 10 nm in intervals of 5 nm, which leads to the strengthened
near-field coupling of LSPRs. The strengthened near-field coupling of LSPRs contributes to the enhancement of
transmission and the red-shift of transmission peak
[23],
[25]. This again demonstrates the important role of near-field of LSPRs
between adjacent holes on the enhanced transmission.
Fig. 3(b) shows the transmission evolution process by varying the length (
a) of small rectangles from 50 nm to 80 nm. Here,
D = 100\ {\rm nm},
b = 50\ {\rm nm}
. However, no obvious change is observed here. The intensity and position of the
transmission peak are nearly invariable as
a increases. It is worth noting that the thickness of the Ag
spacer between the neighboring large and small holes is invariable whatever the length
a changes. The unchanged Ag spacer thickness indicates the
near-field coupling of LSPRs between the neighboring large and small holes in the
y direction almost remains the same. Since SPP and LSPR modes
mainly propagate along the
x direction when illuminated by the plane wave with electric
field along the
x direction, their resonant conditions would not be affected by
the change of
a
[18]. As a result, the spectral properties of the proposed structure do not
change under this condition.
Fig. 4(a) and (b) show the normalized electric field intensity
\vert E\vert^{2}distribution patterns for the peak at
\lambda = 545\ {\rm nm} in the
xoy and
xoz planes (
z = 25\ {\rm nm}), respectively. Here,
\vert E\vert^{2}=E_{\rm x}^{2}\ + E_{\rm y}^{2}+E_{\rm z}^{2},
D = 100\ {\rm nm}, and
a = b = 60\ {\rm nm}
. Weak electric field intensity is found on the surface of the metal film, which confirms
the excitation of SPPs. The excitation of SPPs contributes to the coupling of light into the structure and the further
excitation of LSPRs in the holes. Extremely strong electric field energy confined at both sides of all holes along the
x direction confirms the excitation of two kinds of LSPRs (large
and small holes' plasmon modes)
. When surface plasmons in the hole satisfies a certain phase condition, LSPRs excited at the ridges of nanoholes would
act as efficient dipole scatterers re-emitting the incident light along the
z direction
[9]. The efficient light coupling input and output effects at the two entrances
of nanoholes are clearly observed in
Fig. 4(b). Similar to the plasmon hybridization model, the resonant plasmon
mode in the compound hole arrays would be generated by the coupling and interaction of the large and small holes'
plasmon modes
[22]. Strong electric field energy confined between the adjacent large and
small holes in
Fig. 4(a) demonstrates the appearance of strong near-field coupling of
LSPRs between them. The strengthened coupling and hybridization of LSPRs are closely related to the red-shift of
transmission spectra shown in
Fig. 3(a)
[23]. Therefore, the excitations of SPPs and LSPRs together with the
near-field coupling effects of LSPRs are the main reason for the EOT phenomenon observed in our proposed structure.
Inspired by the optical properties obtained above, we further studied the role of the size (
D) of square holes on transmission spectra, as shown in
Fig. 5(a). Here,
a = b = 50\ {\rm nm}. Similar to those observed in
Fig. 3(a), the transmission peak shows an obvious red-shift and an
approximately linear increase in intensity. The maximum transmission value even reaches up to 94% at
\lambda = 590\ {\rm nm} with the semi-transparent (transmission
> 50%)
bandwidth over 80 nm, which is higher than that of the structure with a compound symmetric arrangement of hole array
reported in
[18]. It is because that when the size of the large holes increases from 100
nm to 130 nm, the thickness of the Ag spacer between the adjacent large and small holes decreases from 25 nm to 10 nm.
The decreased distance could lead to the strengthened near-field coupling of LSPRs and thus results in the enhanced
intensity and red-shift of transmission peak
[23]. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the proposed structure with
different
D is depicted in
Fig. 5(b). An approximatively linear increase from 36 nm to 80 nm is
observed as
D changes, originating from that the increased size of large
holes contributes to larger oscillations for LSPRs.
Fig. 6 presents the normalized electric field intensity
\vert E\vert^{2} distributions of the structure with
D = 100\ {\rm nm} at
\lambda = 522\ {\rm nm} (a) and
D = 130\ {\rm nm} at
\lambda = 581\ {\rm nm} (b) in the
xoy plane. Here,
a = b = 50\ {\rm nm}
. Obviously, stronger field energy occurs between the adjacent large and small holes when
D increases, which implies the enhanced near-field coupling of
LSPRs between them. The strengthened near-field coupling of LSPRs results in the enhanced intensity and the red-shift
of transmission peak as
Fig. 5(a) shown. Compared with
Figs. 4 and
6(a), the electric field energy in
Fig. 6(b) shows more uniform distribution, indicating larger oscillations
for LSPRs as
D increases which contribute to a larger FWHM, as shown in
Fig. 5(b).
We also investigated the optical properties of the proposed structure by changing its environmental dielectric
constant (
\varepsilon) with fixed parameters (
a = b = 50\ {\rm nm},
D = 100\ {\rm nm}
)
. The uniform red-shift of the resonant peak from 522 nm to 650 nm with almost unchanged bandwidth and intensity is
observed as
\varepsilon increases from 1.0 to 3.0 in intervals of 0.5 (see
Fig. 7(a)), suggesting the optical sensitivity of the proposed scheme to
different dielectric surroundings. A linear enhancement of resonant wavelength is found (
Fig. 7(b)). The calculated sensitivity of the proposed structure to
refractive index variation (
n = \varepsilon^{1/2}
) is 178 nm/RIU (refractive index unit)
. This result indicates that our structure can also be used for deep sub-wavelength plasmonic sensors.
Finally, we also investigated the effect of the period (
p) on the optical transmission behaviors, as shown in
Fig. 8. For the Ag film perforated with the hole array, the peak positions
\lambda_{\max}
, originating from the activation of SPP modes, are given in a first approximation by the
following equation
[9]:
\lambda_{\max} = {p\over\sqrt{i^{2}+j^{2}}}\sqrt{\varepsilon_{d}\varepsilon_{m}
\over\varepsilon_{d}+\varepsilon_{m}}\eqno{\hbox{(2)}}
View Source
\lambda_{\max} = {p\over\sqrt{i^{2}+j^{2}}}\sqrt{\varepsilon_{d}\varepsilon_{m}
\over\varepsilon_{d}+\varepsilon_{m}}\eqno{\hbox{(2)}}where
p is the period,
i,
j are integers defining the different diffraction orders, and
\varepsilon_{\rm d} and
\varepsilon_{\rm m}
are the dielectric constants of the interface medium and metal, respectively. Equation
(2) clearly shows that the period and dielectric constants have direct
influences on the wavelength peak position. With the environment dielectric constant increasing, the red-shift of
wavelength peak appears in our proposed structure as shown in
Fig. 7, well agreement with this equation. According to
(2), the resonant wavelength peak would show an identical trend as
p changes. In
Fig. 8, it is clearly observed that when
p increases from 400 nm to 500 nm, the transmission peak shows
an obvious red-shift from 522 nm to 600 nm, accompanied by a slight decrease in transmission intensity. Therefore, the
EOT phenomenon found in our proposed structure can be attributed to the excitations of SPPs on metal film surface and
the LSPRs relying on nanoholes and the strong near-field coupling of LSPRs.