Loading [a11y]/accessibility-menu.js
Uncertainty Modeling and Price-Based Demand Response Scheme Design in Smart Grid | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Uncertainty Modeling and Price-Based Demand Response Scheme Design in Smart Grid


Abstract:

Transforming conventional passive customers into active participants who interact with the utility in real time is the key idea of demand response (DR) in smart grid. How...Show More

Abstract:

Transforming conventional passive customers into active participants who interact with the utility in real time is the key idea of demand response (DR) in smart grid. However, an effective and efficient DR scheme relies on precise prediction and modeling of the uncertainties, i.e., renewable generations and load demands. In this paper, we first present a series of linear prediction models for the load prediction purpose, such as standard autoregressive (AR) process and time-varying AR (TVAR) process, according to different assumptions on the stationarity of customer load profile: piecewise stationarity, local stationarity, and cyclostationarity. Two important issues in AR/TVAR models are addressed: determining the order of AR/TVAR models and calculating the AR/TVAR coefficients. The partial autocorrelation function is analyzed to determine the model order, and the minimum mean squared error estimator is adopted to derive the AR/TVAR coefficients, which leads to the Yule-Walker type of equations. With the load prediction problem addressed, we further design a DR scheduling scheme based on utility cost minimization with different customer clustering sizes. The optimal DR load profiles are given in forms of both 1-D and 2-D water-filling solutions. A tradeoff strategy, which attempts to balance the competing objectives (centralized and distributed), is also provided based on the price-of-anarchy analysis. Simulation results of both the load prediction models and the DR schemes are presented and analyzed.
Published in: IEEE Systems Journal ( Volume: 11, Issue: 3, September 2017)
Page(s): 1743 - 1754
Date of Publication: 11 December 2014

ISSN Information:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

IN a conventional electrical power market, power generation is usually required to match to power demand. Improved resource efficiency of electricity production is achieved by closer alignment of electricity pricing information with energy consumption behaviors. This is because the distributed nature of power demands, as well as different energy consumption behaviors of customers in the power network, makes power demand fluctuating over time and difficult to be controlled precisely [1], [2]. This behavior is expected to become more significant as high penetration of renewable generations and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles appear in generation side and consumption side, respectively. As a result of the highly time-varying generation and consumption profiles, the utility needs to provide enough electrical power to meet peak demand rather than the average to prevent potential blackout events. However, this static and centralized generation pattern is apparently inefficient and thus costly. For example, the U.S. national load factor is about 55%, and 10% of generation and 25% of distribution facilities are used less than 400 h/year, i.e., 5% of the time [3]. Finding possible approaches to improve this inefficient performance is one of the strong incentives to consider a smart grid [4]– [6]. In smart grid infrastructure, the key feature of matching demand to supply by transforming currently static consumers into active participants is the central idea of demand response (DR) [7], which can greatly improve power system efficiency and thus yield huge savings. There is a growing consensus that DR can play an important role in market design [8], [9]. In [7], for example, DR is defined as “ Changes in electric usage by end-use customers from their normal consumption patterns in response to changes in the price of electricity over time, or to incentive payments designed to induce lower electricity use at times of high wholesale market prices or when system reliability is jeopardized.”

Select All
1.
X. Zhang, G. Karady, and S. Ariaratnam, “Optimal allocation of the CHP-based distributed generation on urban energy distribution networks,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 246–253, Jan. 2014.
2.
D. Li, and S. K. Jayaweera, “Optimal stochastic tracking for primary frequency control in an interactive smart grid infrastructure,” IEEE Syst. J., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 978–988, Sep. 2015.
3.
The smart grid: An introduction ”, The U.S. Dept. Energy, Washington, DC, USA, Oct. 2008, Tech. Rep.
4.
X. Zhang, G. Karady, K. Piratla, and S. Ariaratnam, “Network capacity assessment of combined heat and power-based distributed generation in urban energy infrastructures,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, Spec. Issue ldquo;Optimization Methods and Algorithms Applied to Smart Grid”, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2131–2138, Dec. 2013.
5.
D. Li, and S. K. Jayaweera, “Distributed smart-home decision-making in a hierarchical interactive smart grid architecture,” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 75–84, Jan. 201.
6.
X. Zhang, G. Karady, and Y. Guan, “Design methods investigation for residential microgrid infrastructure,” Eur. Trans. Elect. Power, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 2125–2141, Nov. 2011.
7.
Benefits of Demand Response in Electricity Markets and Recommendations for Achieving Them ”, The U.S. Dept. Energy, Washington, DC, USA, Feb. 2006, Tech. Rep.
8.
S. H. S. Han, and K. Sezaki, “Development of an optimal vehicle-to-grid aggregator for frequency regulation,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 65–72, Jun. 2010.
9.
D. Li, and S. K. Jayaweera, “Machine-learning aided optimal customer decisions for an interactive smart grid,” IEEE Syst. J., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1529–1540, Dec. 2015.
10.
P. Faria, Z. Vale, J. Soares, and J. Ferreira, “Demand response management in power systems using particle swarm optimization,” IEEE Intell. Syst., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 43–51, Jul. 2013.
11.
K. Samarakoon, J. Ekanayake, and N. Jenkins, “Reporting available demand response,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1842–1851, Dec. 2013.
12.
X. Zhang, R. Sharma, and Y. He, “Optimal energy management of a rural microgrid system using multi-objective optimization,” in Proc. IEEE PES Conf. Innov. Smart Grid Technol., Washington, DC, USA, Jan. 2012, pp. 1–8.
13.
S. Kishore, and L. Snyder, “Control mechanisms for residential electricity demand in SmartGrids,” in Proc. 1st IEEE Int. Conf. SmartGridComm, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, Oct. 2010, pp. 443–448.
14.
Y. Wang, I. Pordanjani, and W. Xu, “An event-driven demand response scheme for power system security enhancement,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 23–29, Mar. 2011.
15.
B. Chai, J. Chen, Z. Yang, and Y. Zhang, “Demand response management with multiple utility companies: A two-level game approach,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 722–731, Mar. 2014.
16.
S. Maharjan, Q. Zhu, Y. Zhang, S. Gjessing, and T. Basar, “Dependable demand response management in the smart grid: A Stackelberg game approach,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 120–132, Mar. 2013.
17.
F. Rahimi, and A. Ipakchi, “Demand response as a market resource under the smart grid paradigm,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 82–88, Jun. 2010.
18.
J. P. Barton, and D. G. Infield, “Energy storage and its use with intermittent renewable energy,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 441–448, Jun. 2004.
19.
R. Karki, H. Po, and R. Billinton, “A simplified wind power generation model for reliability evaluation,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 533–540, Jun. 2006.
20.
Y. M. Atwa, E. F. El-Saadany, M. M. A. Salama, and R. Seethapathy, “Optimal renewable resources mix for distribution system energy loss minimization,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 360–370, Feb. 2010.
21.
R. Yao, and K. Steemers, “A method of formulating energy load profile for domestic buildings in the UK,” Energy Buildings, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 663–671, Jun. 2005.
22.
J. V. Paatero, and P. D. Lund, “A model for generating household electricity load profiles,” International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 273–290, 2006.
23.
I. F. Visconti, L. F. W. de Souza, J. M. S. C. Costa, and N. R. B. C. Sobrinho, “From power quality monitoring to transient stability analysis: Measurement-based load modeling for dynamic simulations,” in Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Harmonics Quality Power, Bergamo, Italy, Sep. 2010, pp. 1–7.
24.
A. J. Conejo, J. Morales, and L. Baringo, “Real-time demand response model,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 236–242, Dec. 2010.
25.
K. M. Tsui, and S. C. Chan, “Demand response optimization for smart home scheduling under real-time pricing,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1812–1821, Dec. 2012.
26.
D. Li, S. K. Jayaweera, and A. Naseri, “Auctioning game based demand response scheduling in smart grid,” in Proc. IEEE Online Conf. GreenCom, Sep. 2011, pp. 58–63.
27.
S. H. Madaeni, and R. Sioshansi, “Measuring the benefits of delayed price-responsive demand in reducing wind-uncertainty costs,” IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4118–4126, Nov. 2013.
28.
Q. Sun, “Non-informative hierarchical Bayesian inference for non-negative matrix factorization,” Signal Process., vol. 108, pp. 309–321, Mar. 2015.
29.
S. Degerine, and S. Lambert-Lacroix, “Characterization of the partial autocorrelation function of nonstationary time series,” J. Multivariate Anal., vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 46–59, Oct. 2003.
30.
G. E. P. Box, G. M. Jenkins, and G. C. Reinsel, Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, Hoboken, NJ, USA : Wiley, 2008.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.