I. Introduction
IN a conventional electrical power market, power generation is usually required to match to power demand. Improved resource efficiency of electricity production is achieved by closer alignment of electricity pricing information with energy consumption behaviors. This is because the distributed nature of power demands, as well as different energy consumption behaviors of customers in the power network, makes power demand fluctuating over time and difficult to be controlled precisely [1], [2]. This behavior is expected to become more significant as high penetration of renewable generations and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles appear in generation side and consumption side, respectively. As a result of the highly time-varying generation and consumption profiles, the utility needs to provide enough electrical power to meet peak demand rather than the average to prevent potential blackout events. However, this static and centralized generation pattern is apparently inefficient and thus costly. For example, the U.S. national load factor is about 55%, and 10% of generation and 25% of distribution facilities are used less than 400 h/year, i.e., 5% of the time [3]. Finding possible approaches to improve this inefficient performance is one of the strong incentives to consider a smart grid [4]– [6]. In smart grid infrastructure, the key feature of matching demand to supply by transforming currently static consumers into active participants is the central idea of demand response (DR) [7], which can greatly improve power system efficiency and thus yield huge savings. There is a growing consensus that DR can play an important role in market design [8], [9]. In [7], for example, DR is defined as “ Changes in electric usage by end-use customers from their normal consumption patterns in response to changes in the price of electricity over time, or to incentive payments designed to induce lower electricity use at times of high wholesale market prices or when system reliability is jeopardized.”