Abstract:
This paper is motivated by the recent needs to manage possible instabilities between electrically-connected system components and/or sub-systems (layers) in future electr...Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
This paper is motivated by the recent needs to manage possible instabilities between electrically-connected system components and/or sub-systems (layers) in future electric energy systems. It is shown that standard state-space models of general multi-layered energy systems have fundamentally the same structure which can be expressed in terms of: 1) state variables representing stand-alone layer (sub-system) dynamics; and, 2) an interaction variable between the layer and the rest of the system. Once this is recognized, three possible structure-based control designs are derived and analyzed for their performance using a small power system model. The three control designs considered are: 1) a decentralized component (generator)-level output controller; 2) a decentralized sub-system (control area) layer output controller; and, 3) a full-state centralized system-level controller. Pros and cons of these three control architectures and their implications on three qualitatively different IT architectures and standards for dynamics in future electric energy systems are discussed.
Published in: Proceedings of The 2012 Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference
Date of Conference: 03-06 December 2012
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 17 January 2013
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Hollywood, CA, USA