Loading [a11y]/accessibility-menu.js
Design Study Methodology: Reflections from the Trenches and the Stacks | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Design Study Methodology: Reflections from the Trenches and the Stacks


Abstract:

Design studies are an increasingly popular form of problem-driven visualization research, yet there is little guidance available about how to do them effectively. In this...Show More

Abstract:

Design studies are an increasingly popular form of problem-driven visualization research, yet there is little guidance available about how to do them effectively. In this paper we reflect on our combined experience of conducting twenty-one design studies, as well as reading and reviewing many more, and on an extensive literature review of other field work methods and methodologies. Based on this foundation we provide definitions, propose a methodological framework, and provide practical guidance for conducting design studies. We define a design study as a project in which visualization researchers analyze a specific real-world problem faced by domain experts, design a visualization system that supports solving this problem, validate the design, and reflect about lessons learned in order to refine visualization design guidelines. We characterize two axes - a task clarity axis from fuzzy to crisp and an information location axis from the domain expert's head to the computer - and use these axes to reason about design study contributions, their suitability, and uniqueness from other approaches. The proposed methodological framework consists of 9 stages: learn, winnow, cast, discover, design, implement, deploy, reflect, and write. For each stage we provide practical guidance and outline potential pitfalls. We also conducted an extensive literature survey of related methodological approaches that involve a significant amount of qualitative field work, and compare design study methodology to that of ethnography, grounded theory, and action research.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics ( Volume: 18, Issue: 12, December 2012)
Page(s): 2431 - 2440
Date of Publication: 08 October 2012

ISSN Information:

PubMed ID: 26357151
References is not available for this document.

1 Introduction

Over the last decade design studies have become an increasingly popular approach for conducting problem-driven visualization research. Design study papers are explicitly welcomed at several visualization venues as a way to explore the choices made when applying visualization techniques to a particular application area [55], and many exem-plary design studies now exist [17], [34], [35], [56], [94]. A careful reading of these papers reveals multiple steps in the process of conducting a design study, including analyzing the problem, abstracting data and tasks, designing and implementing a visualization solution, evaluating the solution with real users, and writing up the findings.

Select All
1.
M. Agrawala, W. Li and F. Berthouzoz. Design principles for visual communication Communications of the ACM, pp. 60–69, Apr. 2011.
2.
R. Amar, J. Eagan and J. Stasko. Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization in IEEE Symp. Information Visualization (Info Vis), pp. 111–117, 2005.
3.
R. Amar and J. Stasko. Knowledge precepts for design and evaluation of information visualizations IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics (TVCG), vol. 11, (no. 4 ): pp. 432 - 442, 2005.
4.
A. Barsky, T. Munzner, J. Gardy and R. Kincaid. Cerebral: visualizing multiple experimental conditions on a graph with biological context. in IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics (Proc. InfoVis 2008), vol. 14, (no. 6 ): pp. 1253–60, 2008.
5.
D. Baur, F. Seiffert, M. Sedlmair and S. Boring. The streams of our lives: Visualizing listening histories in context. in IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics (Proc. InfoVis 2010). vol. 16, (no. 6 ): pp. 1119–1128, 2010.
6.
H. R. Bernard. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. AltaMira Press, 5th edition, 2011.
7.
H. Beyer and K. Holtzblatt Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco, CA, USA : Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1998.
8.
J. Blomberg, J. Giacomi, A. Mosher and P. Swenton-Wall. Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. Participatory design: Principles and practices, pp. 123–155, 1993.
9.
K. Bodker, F. Kensing and J. Simonsen Participatory IT design: Designing for business and workplace realities. The MIT Press, 2004.
10.
M. Booshehrian, T. Moller, R. M. Peterman and T. Munzner. Vismon: Facilitating analysis of trade-offs, uncertainty, and sensitivity in fisheries management decision making. in Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. EuroVis 2012), 2012. in press.
11.
M. A. Borkin, K. Z. Gajos, A. Peters, D. Mitsouras, S. Melchionna, F. J. Rybicki, C. L. Feldman and H. Pfister. Evaluation of artery visualizations for heart disease diagnosis in IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics (Proc. InfoVis 2011), pp. 2479–2488, 2011.
12.
B. Brown, S. Reeves and S. Sherwood. Into the wild: Challenges and opportunities for field trial methods. In Proc. ACM Conf Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 1657–1666, 2011.
13.
S. Carpendale. Evaluating information visualizations. In A. Kerren, J. T. Stasko, J.-D. Fekete and C. North, Eds. Information Visualization: Human-Centered Issues and Perspectives, volume 4950, pp. 19–45, Springer LNCS, 2008.
14.
K. Charmaz Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications, Inc, 2006.
15.
A. Cockburn Agile Software Development: The Cooperative Game. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2006.
16.
A. Crabtree, T. Rodden, P. Tolmie and G. Button. Ethnography considered harmful. In Proc. ACM Conf Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 879–888, 2009.
17.
P. Craig and J. Kennedy. Coordinated graph and scatter-plot views for the visual exploration of micro array time-series data. In Proc. IEEE Symp. Information Visu-alization (InfoVis), pp. 173–180, 2003.
18.
M. Crotty The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process - Chapter 1. Sage Publications Ltd, 1998.
19.
A. Dix. Theoretical analysis and theory creation. In Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 175–195, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008.
20.
P. Dourish. Implications for design. In Proc. ACM Con! Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 541–550, 2006.
21.
P. Dourish. Responsibilities and implications: further thoughts on ethnography and design. In Proc. ACM Conf Designing for User eXperiences (DUX), pp. 2–16, 2007.
22.
S. P. Dow, A. Glassco, J. Kass, M. Schwarz, D. L. Schwartz and S. R. Klemmer. Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy ACMTrans. Computer-Human Interaction (To CHI), vol. 17, (no. 4 ): pp. 1–24, 2010.
23.
K. A. Ericsson and H. A. Simon. Verbal reports as data Psychological Review, vol. 87, (no. 3 ): pp. 215–251, 1980.
24.
D. M. Fetterman Ethnography: Step by Step. Sage Publications, 2nd edition, 1998.
25.
D. Furniss, A. Blandford and P. Curzon. Confessions from a Grounded Theory PhD: Experiences and Lessons Learnt. In ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction (ToCHI), pp. 113–122, 2011.
26.
S. Greenberg and B. Buxton. Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). In Proc. ACM Con! Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 111–120, 2008.
27.
G. R. Hayes. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction (To CHI), vol. 18, (no. 3 ): pp. 1–20, 2011.
28.
K. Holtzblatt and S. Jones. Contextual inquiry: A participatory technique for system design. In D. Schuler, A. Namioka, Eds. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, pp. 177–210, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993.
29.
J. Hughes, V. King and T. Rodden. Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design in Proc. ACM Conf Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), pp. 429–439, 1994.
30.
J. Hughes, J. O’Brien and T. Rodden. Designing with ethnography: a presentation framework for design. In Proc. Conf Designing Interactive Systems (DIS), pp. 147–158, 1997.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.