Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Performance comparison of layered coding and multiple description coding in packet networks | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore
Scheduled Maintenance: On Monday, 30 June, IEEE Xplore will undergo scheduled maintenance from 1:00-2:00 PM ET (1800-1900 UTC).
On Tuesday, 1 July, IEEE Xplore will undergo scheduled maintenance from 1:00-5:00 PM ET (1800-2200 UTC).
During these times, there may be intermittent impact on performance. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Performance comparison of layered coding and multiple description coding in packet networks


Abstract:

We examine the performance of multiple descriptions coding (MDC) with and without the use of automatic retransmission request (ARQ) protocols for packet network communica...Show More

Abstract:

We examine the performance of multiple descriptions coding (MDC) with and without the use of automatic retransmission request (ARQ) protocols for packet network communication. The rate-distortion lower bound of MDC and layered coding (LC) are incorporated into a performance measure that accounts for the additional costs of excess rates and delay incurred from using ARQ. Results show that unaided MDC is the best for large packet loss rates and large delay, and LC is the best for small loss and moderate delay. In between these two extremes, MDC aided by ARQ provides the best performance
Date of Conference: 28 November 2005 - 02 December 2005
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 23 January 2006
Print ISBN:0-7803-9414-3
Print ISSN: 1930-529X
Conference Location: St. Louis, MO
Citations are not available for this document.

Cites in Papers - |

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.