M2M Protocols: An Overview on LwM2M and XMPP Machine-to-Machine Protocols in IoT Context

In this paper we will present a comprehensive comparison of two used Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communication protocols in the Internet of Things (IoT) scenarios: the Lightweight Machine-to-Machine (LwM2M) and the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP). The discussion will cover their technical overviews, working mechanisms, and comparisons based on several factors such as protocol reliability, security (authentication and encryption), features, pros and cons, message overhead and transmission efficiency, packet size, and connection establishments. The LwM2M protocol is a fast IoT protocol developed by the Open Mobile Alliance (OMA). It is operated with the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) and is greatly famous for being utilized in device management and IoT data communication. Some advantages of LwM2M include providing higher efficiency, easy and stable data transfer, and low power consumption, which is beneficial in long-term and complicated IoT applications, thus making it a good candidate for different industries. On the other hand, the XMPP is a flexible, lightweight protocol that can handle CPU-constrained systems. It is primarily used in messaging and was not developed mainly for IoT applicationsLwM2M and XMPP have different purposes, structures, data processing times, transport, features, and IoT systems architecture. As for security, both protocols have high robust security features. Choosing between LwM2M and XMPP for a specific IoT project needs to be studied based on the requirements of the project to achieve the required aims precisely, as many factors must be taken into consideration when deciding which protocol to use.