Abstract:
Hashing has received significant interest in large-scale data retrieval due to its outstanding computational efficiency. Of late, numerous deep hashing approaches have em...Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
Hashing has received significant interest in large-scale data retrieval due to its outstanding computational efficiency. Of late, numerous deep hashing approaches have emerged, which have obtained impressive performance. However, these approaches can contain ethical risks during image retrieval. To address this, we are the first to study the problem of group fairness within learning to hash and introduce a novel method termed Fairness-aware Hashing with Mixture of Experts (FATE). Specifically, FATE leverages the mixture-of-experts framework as the hashing network, where each expert contributes knowledge from an individual viewpoint, followed by aggregation using the gating mechanism. This strongly enhances the model capability, facilitating the generation of both discriminative and unbiased binary descriptors. We also incorporate fairness-aware contrastive learning, combining sensitive labels with feature similarities to ensure unbiased hash code learning. Furthermore, an adversarial learning objective condition on both deep features and hash codes is employed to further eliminate group biases. Extensive experiments on several benchmark datasets validate the superiority of the proposed FATE compared with various state-of-the-art approaches.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Image Processing ( Volume: 33)
Keywords assist with retrieval of results and provide a means to discovering other relevant content. Learn more.
- IEEE Keywords
- Index Terms
- Binary Descriptors ,
- Unbiased ,
- Extensive Experiments ,
- Benchmark Datasets ,
- Generative Adversarial Networks ,
- Learning Objectives ,
- Deep Features ,
- Hash Function ,
- Image Retrieval ,
- Self-supervised Learning ,
- Gating Mechanism ,
- Ethical Risks ,
- Individual Point Of View ,
- Neural Network ,
- Machine Learning ,
- Positive Samples ,
- Negative Samples ,
- Representation Learning ,
- Male Samples ,
- Accuracy Metrics ,
- Sensitive Attributes ,
- Fairness Considerations ,
- Retrieval Accuracy ,
- Target Label ,
- Retrieval Results ,
- Number Of Experts ,
- Contrast Objective ,
- Efficient Retrieval ,
- Similarity-based Approach ,
- Mean Average Precision
- Author Keywords
Keywords assist with retrieval of results and provide a means to discovering other relevant content. Learn more.
- IEEE Keywords
- Index Terms
- Binary Descriptors ,
- Unbiased ,
- Extensive Experiments ,
- Benchmark Datasets ,
- Generative Adversarial Networks ,
- Learning Objectives ,
- Deep Features ,
- Hash Function ,
- Image Retrieval ,
- Self-supervised Learning ,
- Gating Mechanism ,
- Ethical Risks ,
- Individual Point Of View ,
- Neural Network ,
- Machine Learning ,
- Positive Samples ,
- Negative Samples ,
- Representation Learning ,
- Male Samples ,
- Accuracy Metrics ,
- Sensitive Attributes ,
- Fairness Considerations ,
- Retrieval Accuracy ,
- Target Label ,
- Retrieval Results ,
- Number Of Experts ,
- Contrast Objective ,
- Efficient Retrieval ,
- Similarity-based Approach ,
- Mean Average Precision
- Author Keywords