I. Introduction
Monitoring animals’ health in farms and veterinary clinics requires measuring vital signals such as electrocardiography (ECG), photoplethysmography (PPG), and body temperature [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Wearable devices like smartwatches, chest patches, and wristbands have facilitated personalized health monitoring and health profile creation in humans [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. However, when these are used on animals, wearables face several challenges, as shown in Fig. 1(a). First, animals typically have thicker skin, which leads to poor coupling between wearable devices and tissue, resulting in weak received signals and compromised signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) [11], [12]. Second, animals’ thicker skin which typically has fur or scales on it, necessitating hair shaving for placing the devices and electrodes before each routine assessment. Third, when animals move freely, wearable devices need to be stuck onto the subject’s body through tape or bandages. However, even with these securing measures, the weak attachment of the devices makes them susceptible to motion artifacts, impacting data accuracy [13]. Recently, injectable microchip implants, conventionally employed for animal identification, have shown its great potential as a promising alternative for monitoring animal health [14], [15], [16], [17]. These injectable devices operating subcutaneously can improve coupling with tissue and enhance SNR compared to conventional wearables. Furthermore, the injectable devices can anchor firmly inside the body, which improves the device's immunity to motion artifacts.