Loading [a11y]/accessibility-menu.js
Remaining Useful Life Prediction for Circuit Breaker Based on SM-CFE and SA-BiLSTM | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Remaining Useful Life Prediction for Circuit Breaker Based on SM-CFE and SA-BiLSTM


Abstract:

Targeting at the uncertainty of the degradation of conventional circuit breakers (CCBs) and the perfect mechanical degradation characterization by vibration signals, a re...Show More

Abstract:

Targeting at the uncertainty of the degradation of conventional circuit breakers (CCBs) and the perfect mechanical degradation characterization by vibration signals, a remaining useful life (RUL) prediction method based on similarity measure (SM), comprehensive feature extraction (CFE), and self-attention bidirectional long short-term memory network (SA-BiLSTM) is proposed in this article. First, the degradation-sensitive intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) of the vibration signals are separated by the SM method, and the reconstructed signals are divided into intervals based on the working process of CCBs to obtain the vibration signals for life prediction. Second, the explicit parametric features (EPFs) are obtained based on the vibration events and waveform features, and the implicit parametric features (IPFs) are extracted using the multiscale convolutional autoencoder (MSCAE). Next, the comprehensive features are obtained by the combination of the EPFs and IPFs. On this basis, the degradation mode judgment method is formed by using the least square method (LSM) linear fitting of the EPFs. Finally, a quantitative life prediction model based on SA-BiLSTM is constructed, and greater weights are assigned to the important time steps. The proposed method is proved to show high prediction accuracy and good stability, which is more advantageous compared with other hybrid prediction models.
Article Sequence Number: 3517314
Date of Publication: 23 May 2023

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

With the development of switchgears in intelligence, it is very important to apply the intelligent sensing and advanced detection technologies to the health management of them. Conventional circuit breakers (CCBs) are switchgears with complex mechanical components and rated current of up to 8000 A [1]. Life prediction is an important reflection of the intelligence level of switchgears, and the remaining useful life (RUL) prediction is important to enhance the operational reliability of CCBs [2].

Select All
1.
K. R. Timalsena, P. Piya, and R. Karki, “A novel methodology to incorporate circuit breaker active failure in reliability evaluation of electrical distribution networks,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 1013–1022, Mar. 2021.
2.
S. Zhao, V. Makis, S. Chen, and Y. Li, “Health assessment method for electronic components subject to condition monitoring and hard failure,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 138–150, Jan. 2019.
3.
S. Sun, “Fault diagnosis of conventional circuit breaker contact system based on time–frequency analysis and improved AlexNet,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 70, pp. 1–12, 2021.
4.
Q. Yang, J. Ruan, Z. Zhuang, and D. Huang, “Fault identification for circuit breakers based on vibration measurements,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 4154–4164, Jul. 2020.
5.
Y. Wang, J. Yan, X. Ye, Q. Jing, J. Wang, and Y. Geng, “Few-shot transfer learning with attention mechanism for high-voltage circuit breaker fault diagnosis,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 3353–3360, May 2022.
6.
Y. Lu and Y. Li, “A novel fault diagnosis method for circuit breakers based on optimized affinity propagation clustering,” Int. J. Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 118, pp. 105651–105659, Jun. 2020.
7.
Q. Yang, Y. Peng, Z. Zhuang, and L. Xiong, “Residual mechanical life evaluation for high voltage circuit breaker based on random fuzzy theory,” High Voltage App., vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 161–165 and 171, Aug. 2016.
8.
S. Sun, Z. Wen, W. Zhang, J. Wang, and H. Gao, “On-line mechanical life prediction method for a conventional circuit breaker based on multi-parameter particle swarm optimization-support vector regression using vibration detection,” Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 95110–95128, Jun. 2022.
9.
S. Sun, Z. Wen, T. Du, J. Wang, Y. Tang, and H. Gao, “Remaining life prediction of conventional low-voltage circuit breaker contact system based on effective vibration signal segment detection and MCCAE-LSTM,” IEEE Sensors J., vol. 21, no. 19, pp. 21862–21871, Oct. 2021.
10.
R. Guo, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, and G. Zhang, “Remaining useful life prediction for rolling bearings using EMD-RISI-LSTM,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 70, pp. 1–12, 2021.
11.
B. Pang, M. Nazari, and G. Tang, “Recursive variational mode extraction and its application in rolling bearing fault diagnosis,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 165, pp. 108321–108342, Feb. 2022.
12.
Y. Chen, D. Zhang, and W. Zhang, “MSWR-LRCN: A new deep learning approach to remaining useful life estimation of bearings,” Control. Eng. Pract., vol. 118, pp. 104969–104981, Jan. 2022.
13.
M. Miao and J. Yu, “A deep domain adaptative network for remaining useful life prediction of machines under different working conditions and fault modes,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 70, pp. 1–14, 2021.
14.
S. Suh, P. Lukowicz, and Y. Lee, “Generalized multiscale feature extraction for remaining useful life prediction of bearings with generative adversarial networks,” Knowl. Based Syst., vol. 237, pp. 107866–107876, Feb. 2022.
15.
Q. Yang, J. Ruan, Z. Zhuang, and D. Huang, “Chaotic analysis and feature extraction of vibration signals from power circuit breakers,” IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1124–1135, Jun. 2020.
16.
B. Yang, R. Liu, and E. Zio, “Remaining useful life prediction based on a double-convolutional neural network architecture,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 9521–9530, Dec. 2019.
17.
Q. Luo, Y. Chang, J. Chen, H. Jing, H. Lv, and T. Pan, “Multiple degradation mode analysis via gated recurrent unit mode recognizer and life predictors for complex equipment,” Comput Ind., vol. 123, pp. 103332–103344, Dec. 2020.
18.
Z. Zhao, B. Liang, X. Wang, and W. Lu, “Remaining useful life prediction of aircraft engine based on degradation pattern learning,” Rel. Eng. Syst. Saf., vol. 164, pp. 74–83, Aug. 2017.
19.
A. Soualhi, K. Medjaher, and N. Zerhouni, “Bearing health monitoring based on Hilbert–Huang transform, support vector machine, and regression,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 52–62, Jan. 2015.
20.
Z. Xiong, Y. Xiong, and Y. Xiong, “Life cycle cost prediction of substation based on QPPO optimized LS-SVM,” Electr. Meas. Instrum., vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 76–81, Jun. 2021.
21.
M. Elforjani and S. Shanbr, “Prognosis of bearing acoustic emission signals using supervised machine learning,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 5864–5871, Jul. 2018.
22.
H. Bao, G. Wang, S. Li, and Q. Liu, “Multi-granularity visual explanations for CNN,” Knowl Based Syst, vol. 253, pp. 109474–109484, Oct. 2022.
23.
C. Zhao, X. Huang, Y. Li, and S. Li, “A novel cap-LSTM model for remaining useful life prediction,” IEEE Sensors J., vol. 21, no. 20, pp. 23498–23509, Oct. 2021.
24.
J. Liu, “PEMFC residual life prediction using sparse autoencoder-based deep neural network,” IEEE Trans. Transport. Electrific., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1279–1293, Dec. 2019.
25.
Y. Duan, H. Li, M. He, and D. Zhao, “A BiGRU autoencoder remaining useful life prediction scheme with attention mechanism and skip connection,” IEEE Sensors J., vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 10905–10914, May 2021.
26.
J. Wu, M. Wu, Z. Chen, X. Li, and R. Yan, “Degradation-aware remaining useful life prediction with LSTM autoencoder,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 70, pp. 1–10, 2021.
27.
M. Ma and Z. Mao, “Deep-convolution-based LSTM network for remaining useful life prediction,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1658–1667, Mar. 2021.
28.
S. Sun, J. Liu, J. Wang, F. Chen, S. Wei, and H. Gao, “Remaining useful life prediction for AC contactor based on MMPE and LSTM with dual attention mechanism,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 71, pp. 1–13, 2022.
29.
F. Zhou, Z. Huang, and C. Zhang, “Carbon price forecasting based on CEEMDAN and LSTM,” Appl. Energy, vol. 311, pp. 118601–118620, Apr. 2022.
30.
C. Zhu and X. Li, “Speech endpoint detection method based on LMS noise reduction and improved dual-threshold,” J. Syst. Simul., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1950–1960 and 1967, Sep. 2017.

References

References is not available for this document.