I. Introduction
With the rapid development of multimedia technology, the master–slave synchronization has become a hot spot owing to its potential applications in the fields of secure communication and image encryption [1], [2], [3]. Many chaotic systems, such as cellular neural networks and classical Chua’s circuits, can be transformed into the form of Lur’e systems. As such, considerable research enthusiasm has been stirred toward the study of synchronization of chaotic Lur’e systems in recent years [4], [5], [6], [7]. For the purpose of achieving synchronization, a series of useful control strategies have been reported in the field of control communities [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]. Thereinto, networked control methods, owing to the characteristics of highly integrating the cyberspace and the physical space, have drawn remarkable attention. Quantized control [10], [11], sampled-data control [14], [15], [16], and event-triggered control [17], [18], [19], [20], [21] are all classified as networked control methods. In event-triggered control systems, control signals will be generated only when the measured error reaches a certain predefined threshold. As such, in contrast to the time-triggered control (e.g., sampled-data control), the event-triggered control allows a substantial reduction of the network bandwidth. Therefore, it is of great practical and theoretical values to deal with the synchronization problem of chaotic Lur’e systems under event-triggered control, and numerous excellent works have proliferated in [17], [18], [19], and [21].