I. Introduction
Expansive industrial and academic driven interest exists regarding the systematic design, even automatic design, of Field-Effect Transistor (FET) based analog circuits. Such interest has produced an abundant wealth of literature in an effort to establish best practices of analog design. The most common design approaches rely on Inversion Coefficient (IC) and (GmID) methodologies [1], [2], [3]. The IC approach is based on existing compact models, such as [4], where normalized device saturation current, i.e., , being the device specific current, is selected as the main design variable [5]. Based on this, the circuit behavior in terms of desired specifications, such as Gain-Bandwidth product (GBW) and noise, are analyzed and used to deduce an optimal design point [6]. Despite an analytical nature, few iterations still might be required to finalize designs based on the IC methodology. Depending on target specifications, other normalized parameters such as , where refers to the self-loading capacitance of FET devices, and W being the effective channel width, can be used to enhance efficiency of the design flow [5], [7]. Whereas the GmID approach uses , which is the device transconductance efficiency for the main design parameter and is extracted with the remaining device parameters into Look-Up Tables (LUTs) [8], [2]. In tandem, search algorithms are employed to find optimal physical dimensions and biasing conditions that satisfy design constraints.