Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathMenu.js
Mechanical System Inspired Microscopic Traffic Model: Modeling, Analysis, and Validation | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

Mechanical System Inspired Microscopic Traffic Model: Modeling, Analysis, and Validation


Abstract:

In this paper, we develop a mechanical system inspired microscopic traffic model to characterize the longitudinal interaction among a chain of vehicles. In particular, we...Show More

Abstract:

In this paper, we develop a mechanical system inspired microscopic traffic model to characterize the longitudinal interaction among a chain of vehicles. In particular, we propose a mass-spring-damper-clutch based car-following (CF) model that can naturally capture the car-following behavior of a rational driver. Specifically, the spring and damper can well characterize the driver’s tendency to maintain the same speed as the vehicle ahead while keeping a (speed-dependent) desired spacing. It is also capable of characterizing the impact of the following vehicle on the preceding vehicle, which is generally neglected in existing models. A new string stability criterion is defined for the considered multi-vehicle dynamics, and stability analysis is performed on the system parameters and time delays. An efficient online parameter identification algorithm, sequential recursive least squares with inverse QR decomposition (SRLS-IQR), is developed to estimate the driving-related model parameters. These real-time estimated parameters can be employed in advanced longitudinal control systems to enable accurate prediction of vehicle trajectories for improved safety and fuel efficiency. The proposed model and the parameter identification algorithm are validated on NGSIM, a naturalistic driving dataset, as well as our own connected vehicle driving data. Promising performance is demonstrated.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles ( Volume: 8, Issue: 1, January 2023)
Page(s): 301 - 312
Date of Publication: 27 January 2022

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Rising traffic congestion has become an increasingly frustrating societal problem, especially in large metropolitan areas across the globe. It has led to a variety of issues including great loss in time and money [1], elevated stress and frustration in drivers [2], and intensified air pollution [3]. Based on a recent report from INRIX [1], traffic congestion cost U.S. more than 300 billion dollars and drivers in big cities spent more than 100 hours in congestion in the year of 2017 alone. A number of traffic control technologies have thus been pursued to mitigate the congestion, including ramp metering [4], [5], dynamic speed limits [6], [7], vehicle platooning [8], [9], and active traffic light control [10]–[12]. It is worth noting that all those technologies require accurate estimation and prediction of real-time traffic, which creates a critical need to have a good understanding of the traffic dynamics and flow.

Select All
1.
INRIX, “Inrix global traffic scorecard,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://inrix.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Traffic-Scorecard-Infographic-2018_US-FINAL-v5.pdf
2.
D. A. Hennessy and D. L. Wiesenthal, “The relationship between traffic congestion, driver stress and direct versus indirect coping behaviours,” Ergonomics, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 348–361, 1997.
3.
K. Zhang and S. Batterman, “Air pollution and health risks due to vehicle traffic,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 450-451, pp. 307–16, 2013.
4.
Y. Wang, E. B. Kosmatopoulos, M. Papageorgiou, and I. Papamichail, “Local ramp metering in the presence of a distant downstream bottleneck: Theoretical analysis and simulation study,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 2024–2039, Oct. 2014.
5.
I. Papamichail and M. Papageorgiou, “Traffic-responsive linked ramp-metering control,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 111–121, Mar. 2008.
6.
E. R. Müller, R. C. Carlson, W. Kraus, and M. Papageorgiou, “Microsimulation analysis of practical aspects of traffic control with variable speed limits,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 512–523, Feb. 2015.
7.
A. Hegyi, B. D. Schutter, and J. Hellendoorn, “Optimal coordination of variable speed limits to suppress shock waves,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 102–112, Mar. 2005.
8.
P. Kavathekar and Y. Chen, “Vehicle platooning: A brief survey and categorization,” in Proc. ASME Des. Eng. Tech. Conf., 2011, vol. 3, pp. 829–845.
9.
A. Alam, J. Mårtensson, and K. H. Johansson, “Experimental evaluation of decentralized cooperative cruise control for heavy-duty vehicle platooning,” Control Eng. Pract., vol. 38, pp. 11–25, 2015.
10.
M. B. Younes and A. Boukerche, “Intelligent traffic light controlling algorithms using vehicular networks,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 5887–5899, Aug. 2016.
11.
J. L. Fleck, C. G. Cassandras, and Y. Geng, “Adaptive quasi-dynamic traffic light control,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 830–842, May 2016.
12.
T. Chu, J. Wang, L. Codecà, and Z. Li, “Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for large-scale traffic signal control,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1086–1095, Mar. 2020.
13.
C. F. Daganzo, “The cell transmission model, part II: Network traffic,” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodological, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 79–93, 1995.
14.
P. I. Richards, “Shock waves on the highway,” Oper. Res., vol. 4, pp. 42–51, Feb. 1956.
15.
C. F. Daganzo, “A finite difference approximation of the kinematic wave model of traffic flow,” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodological, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 261–276, 1995.
16.
D. Helbing, A. Hennecke, V. Shvetsov, and M. Treiber, “Master: Macroscopic traffic simulation based on a gas-kinetic, non-local traffic model,” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodological, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 183–211, 2001.
17.
B. S. Kerner and P. Konhäuser, “Cluster effect in initially homogeneous traffic flow,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 48, pp. R2335–R2338, Oct. 1993.
18.
H.-N. Nguyen, B. Fishbain, E. Bitar, D. Mahalel, and P.-O. Gutman, “Dynamic model for estimating the macroscopic fundamental diagram,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 297–302, 2016.
19.
R. Kaur and S. Sharma, “Analyses of a heterogeneous lattice hydrodynamic model with low and high-sensitivity vehicles,” Phys. Lett. A, vol. 382, no. 22, pp. 1449–1455, 2018.
20.
H. Ge, R. Cheng, and L. Lei, “The theoretical analysis of the lattice hydrodynamic models for traffic flow theory,” Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl., vol. 389, no. 14, pp. 2825–2834, 2010.
21.
E. Kometani and T. Sasaki, “Dynamic behaviour of traffic with a nonlinear spacing-speed relationship,” in Proc. Symp. Theory Traffic Flow, 1959, pp. 105–119.
22.
P. Gipps, “A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation,” Transp. Res. Part B: Methodological, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 105–111, 1981.
23.
L. A. Pipes, “An operational analysis of traffic dynamics,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 274–281, 1953.
24.
D. C. Gazis, R. Herman, and R. W. Rothery, “Nonlinear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow,” Oper. Res., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 545–567, 1961.
25.
M. Brackstone and M. McDonald, “Car-following: A historical review,” Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 181–196, 1999.
26.
R. Herman and R. B. Potts, “Single lane traffic theory and experiment,” in Proc. Symp. Theory Traffic Flow, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1959, pp. 147–157.
27.
A. May and H. Keller, “Non integer car following models,” Highway Res. Rec., vol. 199, pp. 19–32, 1967.
28.
M. Aron, “Car following in an urban network: Simulation and experiments,” in Proc. Seminar D, 16th PTRC Meeting, 1988, pp. 27–39.
29.
J. Xing, “A parameter identification of a car following model,” in Proc. 2nd World Congr. ATT, 1995, pp. 1739–1745.
30.
Prof. Tom V. Mathew, “Car following models - lecture notes in transportation systems engineering,” 2019.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.