Loading [a11y]/accessibility-menu.js
End-to-End Learning for OFDM: From Neural Receivers to Pilotless Communication | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

End-to-End Learning for OFDM: From Neural Receivers to Pilotless Communication


Abstract:

The benefits of end-to-end learning has been demonstrated over AWGN channels but has not yet been quantified over realistic wireless channel models. This work aims to fil...Show More

Abstract:

The benefits of end-to-end learning has been demonstrated over AWGN channels but has not yet been quantified over realistic wireless channel models. This work aims to fill this gap by exploring the gains of end-to-end learning over a frequency- and time-selective fading channel using OFDM. With imperfect channel knowledge at the receiver, the shaping gains observed on AWGN channels vanish. Nonetheless, we identify two other sources of performance improvements. The first comes from a neural network-based receiver operating over a large number of subcarriers and OFDM symbols which allows to reduce the number of orthogonal pilots without loss of BER. The second comes from entirely eliminating orthogonal pilots by jointly learning a neural receiver together with either superimposed pilots (SIPs), combined with conventional QAM, or an optimized constellation. The learned constellation works for a wide range of signal-to-noise ratios, Doppler and delay spreads, has zero mean and does hence not contain any form of SIP. Both schemes achieve the same BER as the pilot-based baseline with 7% higher throughput. Thus, we believe that a jointly learned transmitter and receiver are a very interesting component for beyond-5G communication systems which could remove the need and associated overhead for demodulation reference signals.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications ( Volume: 21, Issue: 2, February 2022)
Page(s): 1049 - 1063
Date of Publication: 06 August 2021

ISSN Information:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

End-to-end learning has attracted a lot of attention in recent years and it is considered to be a promising technology for future wireless communication systems [1], [2]. Its key idea is to implement the transmitter, channel, and receiver as a single neural network (NN), referred to as an autoencoder, that is trained to achieve the highest possible information rate [3], [4]. Since its first application to wireless communications [5], end-to-end learning has been extended to other fields including optical wireless [6] and optical fiber [7]. However, most of the literature is either simulation-based on simple channel models, such as additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) or Rayleigh block fading (RBF), or experimental, but performed in static environments [3], [8]. Such setups do not account for the Doppler and delay spread encountered in practical wireless systems that lead to variations of the channel response in both time and frequency. The evaluation of end-to-end learning on more realistic channel models is overlooked in the existing literature but critical to bring the technology from theory to practice.

Select All
1.
J. Downey, B. Hilburn, T. O’Shea, and N. West, “Machine learning remakes radio,” IEEE Spectr., vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 35–39, May 2020.
2.
D. Gündüz, P. de Kerret, N. Sidiroupoulos, D. Gesbert, C. Murthy, and M. van der Schaar, “Machine learning in the air,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 2184–2199, Oct. 2019.
3.
M. Stark, F. Ait Aoudia, and J. Hoydis, “Joint learning of geometric and probabilistic constellation shaping,” in Proc. IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), Dec. 2019, pp. 1–6.
4.
S. Cammerer, F. Ait Aoudia, S. Dorner, M. Stark, J. Hoydis, and S. ten Brink, “Trainable communication systems: Concepts and prototype,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 5489–5503, Sep. 2020.
5.
T. O’Shea and J. Hoydis, “An introduction to deep learning for the physical layer,” IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 563–575, Dec. 2017.
6.
Z.-R. Zhu, J. Zhang, R.-H. Chen, and H.-Y. Yu, “Autoencoder-based transceiver design for OWC systems in log-normal fading channel,” IEEE Photon. J., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1–12, Oct. 2019.
7.
B. Karanov, “End-to-end deep learning of optical fiber communications,” J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 36, no. 20, pp. 4843–4855, Oct. 15, 2018.
8.
S. Dörner, S. Cammerer, J. Hoydis, and S. ten Brink, “Deep learning based communication over the air,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 132–143, Feb. 2018.
9.
H. Ye, G. Y. Li, and B.-H. Juang, “Power of deep learning for channel estimation and signal detection in OFDM systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 114–117, Feb. 2018.
10.
M. Honkala, D. Korpi, and J. M. J. Huttunen, “DeepRx: Fully convolutional deep learning receiver,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 3925–3940, Jun. 2021.
11.
A. Felix, S. Cammerer, S. Dörner, J. Hoydis, and S. ten Brink, “OFDM-autoencoder for end-to-end learning of communications systems,” in Proc. IEEE 19th Int. Workshop Signal Process. Adv. Wireless Commun. (SPAWC), Jun. 2018, pp. 1–5.
12.
M. Kim, W. Lee, and D.-H. Cho, “A novel PAPR reduction scheme for OFDM system based on deep learning,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 510–513, Mar. 2018.
13.
E. Balevi and J. G. Andrews, “One-bit OFDM receivers via deep learning,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 4326–4336, Jun. 2019.
14.
H. Ye, G. Y. Li, and B.-H.-F. Juang, “Deep learning based end-to-end wireless communication systems without pilots,” IEEE Trans. Cognit. Commun. Netw., early access, Feb. 23, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TCCN.2021.3061464.
15.
A. Saci, A. Al-Dweik, A. Shami, and Y. Iraqi, “One-shot blind channel estimation for OFDM systems over frequency-selective fading channels,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 65, no. 12, pp. 5445–5458, Dec. 2017.
16.
G. Taricco, “On the convergence of multipath fading channel gains to the Rayleigh distribution,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 549–552, Oct. 2015.
17.
R. W. Heath, Jr., and A. Lozano, Foundations of MIMO Communication. Cambridge, U.K. : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018.
18.
R. H. Clarke, “A statistical theory of mobile-radio reception,” Bell Syst. Tech. J., vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 957–1000, July/Aug. 1968.
19.
F. Sanzi, S. Jelting, and J. Speidel, “A comparative study of iterative channel estimators for mobile OFDM systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 849–859, Sep. 2003.
20.
E. Björnson, J. Hoydis, and L. Sanguinetti, “Massive MIMO networks: Spectral, energy, and hardware efficiency,” Found. Trends Signals Process., vol. 11, nos. 3–4, pp. 154–655, 2017.
21.
T. M. Cover, Elements of Information Theory. Hoboken, NJ, USA : Wiley, 1999.
22.
F. Ait Aoudia and J. Hoydis, “Model-free training of end-to-end communication systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 2503–2516, Nov. 2019.
23.
W. J. Dally, Y. Turakhia, and S. Han, “Domain-specific hardware accelerators,” Commun. ACM, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 48–57, Jun. 2020.
24.
M. Soltani, V. Pourahmadi, and H. Sheikhzadeh, “Pilot pattern design for deep learning-based channel estimation in OFDM systems,” 2020, arXiv:2003.08980. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.08980
25.
M. B. Mashhadi and D. Gunduz, “Pruning the pilots: Deep learning-based pilot design and channel estimation for MIMO-OFDM systems,” 2020, arXiv:2006.11796. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11796
26.
X. Ma and Z. Gao, “Data-driven deep learning to design pilot and channel estimator for massive MIMO,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 5677–5682, Mar. 2020.
27.
K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2016, pp. 770–778.
28.
IEEE Standard for Information Technology—Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Specific Requirements—Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, IEEE Standard 802.11n-2009, Oct. 2009.
29.
S. ten Brink, J. Speidel, and R.-H. Yan, “Iterative demapping and decoding for multilevel modulation,” in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, Nov. 1998, pp. 579–584.
30.
G. Böcherer, “Achievable rates for probabilistic shaping,” 2017, arXiv:1707.01134. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.01134

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.