Psychometric Properties and Construct Validity of Online Learning Readiness Scale (OLRS) Indonesian Version | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore

Psychometric Properties and Construct Validity of Online Learning Readiness Scale (OLRS) Indonesian Version


Abstract:

This study aims to adapt the Online Learning Readiness Scale (OLRS) into Bahasa Indonesia and to test its psychometric properties for Indonesian use. OLRS was formed by f...Show More

Abstract:

This study aims to adapt the Online Learning Readiness Scale (OLRS) into Bahasa Indonesia and to test its psychometric properties for Indonesian use. OLRS was formed by five dimensions: computer/internet self-efficacy, self-directed learning, motivation for learning, learner control, and online communication self-efficacy. The adaptation process was carried out in two phases, the first phase of translation and the second phase of empirical testing. The procedure of adaptation is performed following adequate adaptation guidelines. After being translated, the scale was administered to 749 respondents. The result of CFA indicates a good model fit.
Date of Conference: 17-17 October 2020
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 08 December 2020
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Malang, Indonesia
References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

When the Covid-19 pandemic hit the entire world, many changes were put in place to prevent a massive spread [1]. One form of change must be made in learning activities, from faceto-face learning to online learning [2]. Even though onlinebased technology is very familiar in the community, its use for learning is minimal and causes several problems [3] [4]. Several online media are used in education by students and teachers in Indonesia, e.g., Whatsapp, Microsoft learning, or Google Classroom, Zoom, Skype, etc. [5]. These various applications have become familiar to use, even though previously they were not very popular.

Select All
1.
World Health Organization. ( 2019 ). “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public.” In https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public
2.
Dhawan, S. ( 2020 ). “Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis.” in Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49 ( 1 ), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
3.
Mulenga, E. M., & Marbán, J. M. ( 2020 ). “Prospective teachers’ online learning mathematics activities in the age of COVID-19: A cluster analysis approach.” in Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16 ( 9 ). https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/8345
4.
Rasmitadila, R., Aliyyah, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. ( 2020 ). The Perceptions of Primary School Teachers of Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic Period: A Case Study in Indonesia.” In Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7 ( 2 ), 90. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/388
5.
Bahasoan, A., Ayuandiani, W., & Mukhram, M. ( 2020 ). “Effectiveness of Online Learning In Pandemic Covid-19”.in International Journal Of Science, Technology & Management. 100–106.
6.
Lemay, D. J., & Doleck, T. ( 2020 ). “Online Learning Communities in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Social Learning Network Analysis of Twitter during the Shutdown.” In International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education (IJAI), 2 ( 1 ), 85. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijai.v2i1.15427
7.
Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. ( 2010 ). “Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions”. In Computers and Education, 55 ( 3 ), 1080–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004
8.
Warner, D., Christie, G., & Choy, S. ( 1998 ). “The readiness of VET clients for flexible delivery including online learning.” Brisbane : Australian National Training Authority, 1–64.
9.
McVay, M. ( 2001 ). “How to be a successful distance learning student: Learning on the Internet.” New York : Prentice Hall.
10.
Brislin, R. W. ( 1980 ). “Translation and content analysis of oral and written material.” Handbook of Cross-Cultural Research, 1, 389–444.
11.
Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. ( 2005 ). “Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation.” In Value in Health, 8 ( 2 ), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
12.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. ( 2009 ). “Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Edition) (7th ed.) ”. Prentice Hall.
13.
Hinton, P. R. ( 1997 ). “Statistics Explained: A Guide for Social Science Students”. New York: Routledge.
14.
Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. ( 1977 ). “Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models.” In Sociological Methodology, 8, 84–136.
15.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. ( 2003 ). “Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures.” In MPR-Online, 8 ( May 2003 ), 23–74.
16.
Wijanto, S. ( 2008 ). “Structural Equation Modelling dengan Lisrel 8.8.” Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu.
17.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. ( 1995 ). “Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.). In tructural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications.” California : SAGE Publications Inc.
18.
Hair J. F., Jr., Tatham, R. L., & William, C. ( 1995 ). “Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings.” New Jersey : Prentice-Hall.
19.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. ( 2006 ). “Using Multivariate Statistics.” Boston : Pearson Education, Inc.
20.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. ( 1981 ). “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” In Journal of Marketing Research, 39–50.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.