Loading [MathJax]/extensions/MathEvents.js
A Millimeter-Wave Receiver Using a Wideband Low-Noise Amplifier With One-Port Coupled Resonator Loads | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore

A Millimeter-Wave Receiver Using a Wideband Low-Noise Amplifier With One-Port Coupled Resonator Loads


Abstract:

This article presents design techniques to facilitate the use of the driving point impedance (Z11) of one-port transformer-coupled resonators as wideband loads of millime...Show More

Abstract:

This article presents design techniques to facilitate the use of the driving point impedance (Z11) of one-port transformer-coupled resonators as wideband loads of millimeter-wave amplifier stages for a 28-GHz receiver front end. While the use of both the Z11 of a one-port and the transimpedance (Z21) of a two-port coupled resonator is considered to achieve a wideband response, it is shown that under conditions of low magnetic coupling and constrained network quality factor, the use of Z11 can result in a higher gain-bandwidth product of low-noise amplifier (LNA) amplifier stages. The effect of the complex zero in the Z11 response on the in-band gain ripple is shown to be alleviated merely by lowering the quality factor of the transformer's secondary coil; this strongly motivates the use of compact, nested-inductor transformer layouts. Implemented in a 65-nm CMOS process, a three-stage LNA (with Z11 wideband loads in two stages) achieves a 24.4-32.3-GHz bandwidth (27.9 % fractional bandwidth), a peak S21 of 24.4 dB (20.4 dB), a minimum noise figure (NF) of 4 dB (4.6 dB), and an input-referred P1dB of -23 dBm (-22 dBm) while consuming 22-mW (9.9 mW) power from a 1.1-V (0.85 V) supply. The use of compact transformers limits the LNA's footprint to only 0.12 mm2. A 26.5-32.5-GHz quadrature receiver prototype employing the LNA achieves a 29.5-dB peak conversion gain, a 5.3-dB minimum NF, and a -26-dBm inputreferred P1dB while consuming 33 mW from a 1.1-V supply.
Published in: IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques ( Volume: 68, Issue: 9, September 2020)
Page(s): 3794 - 3803
Date of Publication: 22 April 2020

ISSN Information:

Funding Agency:

References is not available for this document.

I. Introduction

Phased-array transceivers [1]–[3] are required to overcome path loss and realize advanced multiple-input–multiple-output (MIMO) communication in emerging 5G networks in the 28-/38-GHz bands [4]. Since antenna arrays with high element count are needed, it is important for the transceiver circuits to be compact, scalable and energy-efficient. In particular, wideband low-noise amplifiers (LNAs) that can cover contiguous and/or widely separated narrowband channels of a diverse spectrum [3] with low cost and small die area are of high interest, especially in the 60-GHz [5]–[7] and the 28-GHz bands [3], [8], [9]. Recently, coupled LC resonators have received wide interest in various millimeter-wave (mm-wave) circuits, including LNAs [3], [8]–[10], wide-tuning voltage-controlled oscillators (VCOs) [11], [12], and power amplifiers (PAs) [13], [14]. The resonators can be coupled capacitively, inductively (through an explicit inductor), or magnetically (through a mutual inductance), and each result in a fourth-order transfer function. Magnetic coupling is usually preferred since it results in a lower ripple for a given bandwidth [6]. Recent mm-wave LNAs in this class exclusively use the transimpedance () of weakly coupled transformer-coupled resonators as wideband loads [3], [5], [6].

Select All
1.
R. W. Heath, Jr., N. Gonzalez-Prelcic, S. Rangan, W. Roh, and A. M. Sayeed, “An overview of signal processing techniques for millimeter wave MIMO systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 436–453, Apr. 2016.
2.
S. Kundu and J. Paramesh, “A compact, supply-voltage scalable 45–66 GHz baseband-combining CMOS phased-array receiver,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 527–542, Feb. 2015.
3.
S. Mondal, R. Singh, A. I. Hussein, and J. Paramesh, “A 25–30 GHz 8-antenna 2-stream hybrid beamforming receiver for MIMO communication,” in Proc. IEEE Radio Freq. Integr. Circuits Symp. (RFIC), Jun. 2017, pp. 112–115.
4.
( Apr. 2017 ). 5G Spectrum Recommendations. [Online]. Available: https://www.5gamericas.org/files/9114/9324/1786/5GA_5G_Spectrum_Recommendations_2017_FINAL.pdf
5.
V. Bhagavatula, T. Zhang, A. R. Suvarna, and J. C. Rudell, “An ultra-wideband IF millimeter-wave receiver with a 20 GHz channel bandwidth using gain-equalized transformers,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 323–331, Feb. 2016.
6.
M. Vigilante and P. Reynaert, “On the design of wideband transformer-based fourth order matching networks for E -band receivers in 28-nm CMOS,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 2071–2082, Aug. 2017.
7.
W. Shin, S. Callender, S. Pellerano, and C. Hull, “A compact 75 GHz LNA with 20 dB gain and 4 dB noise figure in 22nm FinFET CMOS technology,” in Proc. IEEE Radio Freq. Integr. Circuits Symp. (RFIC), Jun. 2018, pp. 284–287.
8.
S. Mondal, R. Singh, A. I. Hussein, and J. Paramesh, “A 25–30 GHz fully-connected hybrid beamforming receiver for MIMO communication,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1275–1287, May 2018.
9.
S. Mondal, R. Singh, and J. Paramesh, “A reconfigurable 28/37 GHz hybrid-beamforming MIMO receiver with inter-band carrier aggregation and RF-domain LMS weight adaptation,” in IEEE Int. Solid-State Circuits Conf. (ISSCC) Dig. Tech. Papers, Feb. 2018, pp. 72–74.
10.
R. Singh, S. Mondal, and J. Paramesh, “A compact digitally-assisted merged LNA vector modulator using coupled resonators for integrated beamforming transceivers,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 2555–2568, Jul. 2019.
11.
A. Bevilacqua, F. P. Pavan, C. Sandner, A. Gerosa, and A. Neviani, “Transformer-based dual-mode voltage-controlled oscillators,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Exp. Briefs, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 293–297, Apr. 2007.
12.
G. Li, L. Liu, Y. Tang, and E. Afshari, “A low-phase-noise wide-tuning-range oscillator based on resonant mode switching,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1295–1308, Jun. 2012.
13.
S. V. Thyagarajan, A. M. Niknejad, and C. D. Hull, “A 60 GHz drain-source neutralized wideband linear power amplifier in 28 nm CMOS,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Reg. Papers, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 2253–2262, Aug. 2014.
14.
S. Mondal, R. Singh, and J. Paramesh, “21.3 a reconfigurable bidirectional 28/37/39 GHz front-end supporting MIMO-TDD, carrier aggregation TDD and FDD/Full-duplex with self-interference cancellation in digital and fully connected hybrid beamformers,” in IEEE Int. Solid-State Circuits Conf. (ISSCC) Dig. Tech. Papers, Feb. 2019, pp. 348–350.
15.
M. El-Noza, E. Sanchez-Sinencio, and K. Entesari, “A millimeter-wave (23–32 GHz) wideband BiCMOS low-noise amplifier,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 289–299, Feb. 2010.
16.
M. Keshavarz Hedayati, A. Abdipour, R. Sarraf Shirazi, C. Cetintepe, and R. B. Staszewski, “A 33-GHz LNA for 5G wireless systems in 28-nm bulk CMOS,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Exp. Briefs, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 1460–1464, Oct. 2018.
17.
M. Elkholy, S. Shakib, J. Dunworth, V. Aparin, and K. Entesari, “A wideband variable gain LNA with high OIP3 for 5G using 40-nm bulk CMOS,” IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 64–66, Jan. 2018.
18.
V. Chauhan and B. Floyd, “A 24–44 GHz UWB LNA for 5G cellular frequency bands,” in Proc. 11th Global Symp. Millim. Waves (GSMM), May 2018, pp. 1–3.
19.
U. Kodak and G. M. Rebeiz, “A 42 mW 26–28 GHz phased-array receive channel with 12 dB gain, 4 dB NF and 0 dBm IIP3 in 45 nm CMOS SOI,” in Proc. IEEE Radio Freq. Integr. Circuits Symp. (RFIC), May 2016, pp. 348–351.
20.
S. Kong, H.-D. Lee, S. Jang, J. Park, K.-S. Kim, and K.-C. Lee, “A 28-GHz CMOS LNA with stability-enhanced Gm-boosting technique using transformers,” in Proc. IEEE Radio Freq. Integr. Circuits Symp. (RFIC), Jun. 2019, pp. 4–7.
21.
S. Lee, J. Park, and S. Hong, “A Ka-band phase-compensated variable-gain CMOS low-noise amplifier,” IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 131–133, Feb. 2019.
22.
P. Qin and Q. Xue, “Design of wideband LNA employing cascaded complimentary common gate and common source stages,” IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 587–589, Jun. 2017.
23.
P. Qin and Q. Xue, “Compact wideband LNA with gain and input matching bandwidth extensions by transformer,” IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett., vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 657–659, Jul. 2017.
24.
C. Feng, X. P. Yu, W. M. Lim, and K. S. Yeo, “A compact 2.1–39 GHz self-biased low-noise amplifier in 65 nm CMOS technology,” IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 662–664, Dec. 2013.
25.
H.-C. Yeh, C.-C. Chiong, S. Aloui, and H. Wang, “Analysis and design of millimeter-wave low-voltage CMOS cascode LNA with magnetic coupled technique,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 4066–4079, Dec. 2012.
26.
H.-K. Chen, Y.-S. Lin, and S.-S. Lu, “Analysis and design of a 1.6–28-GHz compact wideband LNA in 90-nm CMOS using a \pi -match input network,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 2092–2104, Aug. 2010.
27.
S. Kundu and J. Paramesh, “A transformer-neutralized 0.6 V {\text{V}}_{DD} 17–29 GHz LNA and its application to an RF front-end,” Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process., vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 173–186, May 2015.
28.
Y.-T. Lo and J.-F. Kiang, “Design of wideband LNAs using parallel-to-series resonant matching network between common-gate and common-source stages,” IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 2285–2294, Sep. 2011.
29.
J. Borremans, P. Wambacq, C. Soens, Y. Rolain, and M. Kuijk, “Low-area active-feedback low-noise amplifier design in scaled digital CMOS,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 2422–2433, Nov. 2008.
30.
M. Parlak and J. F. Buckwalter, “A 2.9-dB noise figure, Q-band millimeter-wave CMOS SOI LNA,” in Proc. IEEE Custom Integr. Circuits Conf. (CICC), Sep. 2011, pp. 1–4.

Contact IEEE to Subscribe

References

References is not available for this document.