The overview of the clustered GPS system for privacy valuing active localization. Users that can provide high mutual benefit to each other are clustered for active locali...
Abstract:
With the proliferation of mobile devices having BLE capability and the introduction of Beacon technology, crowdsourcing-based approaches have recently emerged as a promis...Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
With the proliferation of mobile devices having BLE capability and the introduction of Beacon technology, crowdsourcing-based approaches have recently emerged as a promising solution for localization of lost objects or individuals (e.g., children or elders). By attaching affordable Beacon tags to them, objects of care could be tracked and localized by user devices in the proximity. While crowd GPS service has gained popularity recently, it has not extended beyond passive mode in which localization is achieved in the background without intruding the mobility of users. In this paper, we study the localization of lost objects through the crowd GPS service in an active manner. We propose clustering users in a Beacon tag network based on the benefits they can receive from each other in terms of the localization of their lost items. A new metric is developed to quantify this benefit and the users that can provide most of the total possible benefits to each other are then grouped together so that they can provide active localization service for only the users most beneficial to them. The clustering of users is achieved based on both a greedy heuristic based algorithm and a genetic algorithm. Extensive simulation results are conducted utilizing both synthetic data and real location based social network datasets. The results show the effective partitioning of the users under different user counts and groups while valuing the privacy of users at its maximum by limiting the number of interactions between users.
The overview of the clustered GPS system for privacy valuing active localization. Users that can provide high mutual benefit to each other are clustered for active locali...
Published in: IEEE Access ( Volume: 6)
References is not available for this document.
Select All
1.
Pixie. ( Mar. 2017 ). The Nation’s Biggest Lost and Found Survey. [Online]. Available: https://getpixie.com/blogs/news/lostfoundsurvey
2.
N. Guy. ( Oct. 2017 ). The Best GPS Trackers for Cats and Dogs. [Online]. Available: https://thewirecutter.com/reviews/best-gps-pet-trackers/
3.
R. Edwards. Best Wearable GPS Trackers for Kids Buyers Guide. Accessed: Apr. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.safewise.com/resources/wearable-gps-tracking-devices-for-kids-guide
4.
K. Bishop. ( 2017 ). Growth Business: GPS TrackingĚ The Elderly. [Online]. Available: https://www.cnbc.com/2014/03/11/growth-business-gps-tracking-the-elderly.html
5.
C. Gomez, J. Oller, and J. Paradells, “Overview and evaluation of bluetooth low energy: An emerging low-power wireless technology,” Sensors, vol. 12, no., pp. 11734–11753, 2012.
6.
thetileapp.com. ( 2016 ). Tile Bluetooth Tracker Device. [Online]. Available: https://www.thetileapp.com
7.
TraxFamily.com. ( 2016 ). A Really Small and Light GPS Tracker for Kids and Pets. [Online]. Available: https://traxfamily.com
8.
S. Cohen. ( 2015 ). Locus Pocus Can Track all Your Bluetooth Devices—And Other People’s, Too, VentureBeat. [Online]. Available: http://venturebeat.com/2015/06/06/locus-pocus-can-trackall-your-bluetooth-devices-and-other-peoples-too
9.
J. Zhang, F. Tang, L. Barolli, Y. Yang, and W. Xu, “Information gain based maximum task matching in spatial crowdsourcing,” in Proc. IEEE 31st Int. Conf. Adv. Inf. Netw. Appl. (AINA), Mar. 2017, pp. 886–893.
10.
L. Kazemi and C. Shahabi, “GeoCrowd: Enabling query answering with spatial crowdsourcing,” in Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Adv. Geographic Inf. Syst., 2012, pp. 189–198.
11.
E. Bulut and B. K. Szymanski, “Identifying the space buddies to track lost items,” in Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop Social Sens., 2017, pp. 69–74.
12.
A. Campbell, “The rise of people-centric sensing,” in Distributed Computing and Networking. ICDCN 2009 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), vol. 5408, V. Garg, R. Wattenhofer, and K. Kothapalli, Eds. Berlin, Germany : Springer, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-540-92295-7_3
13.
R. K. Ganti, F. Ye, and H. Lei, “Mobile crowdsensing: Current state and future challenges,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 32–39, Nov. 2011.
14.
B. O. Holzbauer, B. K. Szymanski, and E. Bulut, “Socially-aware market mechanism for participatory sensing,” in Proc. 1st ACM Int. Workshop Mission-Oriented Wireless Sensor Netw., 2012, pp. 9–14.
15.
( 2015 ). Bluetooth Beyond. [Online]. Available: http://www.telecomreview.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=1545:bluetooth-andbeyond&Itemid=427
16.
Apple. ( 2016 ). iBeacon for Developers. [Online]. Available: https://developer.apple.com/ibeacon
17.
J. Hallberg, C. Nugent, R. Davies, and M. Donnelly, “Localisation of forgotten items using rfid technology,” in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Appl. Biomed. (ITAB), Nov. 2009, pp. 1–4.
18.
M. Sasagawa, K. Ikematsu, and I. Siio, “Simply tag and find: Finding indoor items by using detection history of RFID tags,” in Proc. 2016 ACM Int. Joint Conf. Pervasive Ubiquitous Comput., Adjunct, 2016, pp. 365–368.
19.
D. Schwarz, M. Schwarz, J. Stückler, and S. Behnke, “Cosero, find my keys! Object localization and retrieval using bluetooth low energy tags,” in RoboCup 2014: Robot World Cup XVIII. RoboCup (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), vol. 8992, R. Bianchi, H. Akin, S. Ramamoorthy, and K. Sugiura, Eds. Cham, Switzerland : Springer, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-18615-3_16
20.
P. Martin, B.-J. Ho, N. Grupen, S. Muñoz, and M. B. Srivastava, “An iBeacon primer for indoor localization: Demo abstract,” in Proc. 1st ACM Conf. Embedded Syst. Energy-Efficient Buildings, 2014, pp. 190–191.
21.
H.-E. Chen, Y.-Y. Lin, C.-H. Chen, and I.-F. Wang, “BlindNavi: A navigation app for the visually impaired smartphone user,” in Proc. 33rd Annu. ACM Conf. Extended Abstracts Human Factors Comput. Syst., 2015, pp. 19–24.
22.
J. Yang, Z. Wang, and X. Zhang, “An iBeacon-based indoor positioning systems for hospitals,” Int. J. Smart Home, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 161–168, 2015.
23.
R. Couto, J. Leal, P. M. Costa, and T. Galvão, “Exploring ticketing approaches using mobile technologies: QR codes, NFC and BLE,” in Proc. IEEE 18th Int. Conf. Intell. Transp. Syst., Sep. 2015, pp. 7–12.
24.
N. Allurwar, B. Nawale, and S. Patel, “Beacon for proximity target marketing,” Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci, vol. 5, no. 5, p. 16359–16364, 2016.
25.
J. Nickels, “Find my stuff: Supporting physical objects search with relative positioning,” in Proc. ACM Int. Joint Conf. Pervasive Ubiquitous Comput., 2013, pp. 325–334.
26.
S. Mirri, C. Prandi, P. Salomoni, and L. Monti, “Social location awareness: A prototype of altruistic IoT,” in Proc. 8th IFIP Int. Conf. New Technol., Mobility Secur. (NTMS), Nov. 2016, pp. 1–5.
27.
I. Agadakos, J. Polakis, and G. Portokalidis, “Techu: Open and privacy-preserving crowdsourced GPS for the masses,” in Proc. 15th Annu. Int. Conf. Mobile Syst., Appl., Services, 2017, pp. 475–487.
28.
E. Bulut and B. K. Szymanski, “Exploiting friendship relations for efficient routing in mobile social networks,” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2254–2265, Dec. 2012.
29.
E. Bulut, S. C. Geyik, and B. K. Szymanski, “Utilizing correlated node mobility for efficient DTN routing,” Pervasive Mobile Comput., vol. 13, pp. 150–163, Aug. 2014.
30.
E. Falkenauer, Genetic Algorithms and Grouping Problems. Hoboken, NJ, USA : Wiley, 1998.