Abstract:
This paper concerns time-dependent bioluminescence imaging under low-photon conditions. In this problem, one seeks to reconstruct sources of light contained within a tiss...Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
This paper concerns time-dependent bioluminescence imaging under low-photon conditions. In this problem, one seeks to reconstruct sources of light contained within a tissue sample from noisy boundary measurements of scattered light. The main challenge in this problem lies in processing signals that are constrained by partial differential equations. In this paper, we propose a novel two-stage method to recover time-dependent bioluminescent sources from boundary measurements corrupted by Poisson noise. Numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Date of Conference: 30 October 2016 - 02 November 2016
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 06 February 2017
ISBN Information:
Conference Location: Monterey, CA, USA
References is not available for this document.
Contents Select All
1.
J. Feng, C. Qin, K. Jia, S. Zhu, X. Yang, and J. Tian, “Bioluminescence tomography imaging in vivo: recent advances,” Selected Topics in QuantumElectronics, IEEE Journal of, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1394–1402, 2012.
2.
H. Gao and H. Zhao, “Multilevel bioluminescence tomography based on radiative transfer equation part 1: 11 regularization,” Optics Express, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1854–1871, 2010.
3.
――, “Multilevel bioluminescence tomography based on radiative transfer equation part 2: total variation and 11 data fidelity,” Optics Express, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 2894–2912, 2010.
4.
X. He, J. Liang, X. Wang, J. Yu, X. Qu, X. Wang, Y. Hou, D. Chen, F. Liu, and J. Tian, “Sparse reconstruction for quantitative bioluminescence tomography based on the incomplete variables truncated conjugate gradient method,” Optics Express, vol. 18, no. 24, pp. 24825–24841, 2010.
5.
H. R. A. Basevi, K. M. Tichauer, F. Leblond, H. Dehghani, J. A. Guggenheim, R. W. Holt, and I. B. Styles, “Compressive sensing based reconstruction in bioluminescence tomography improves image resolution and robustness to noise,” Biomedical optics express, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 2131–2141, 2012.
6.
J. Feng, C. Qin, K. Jia, S. Zhu, K. Liu, D. Han, X. Yang, Q. Gao, and J. Tian, “Total variation regularization for bioluminescence tomography with the split bregman method,” Applied Optics, vol. 51, no. 19, pp. 4501–4512, 2012.
7.
X. Zhang, Y. Lu, and T. Chan, “A novel sparsity reconstruction method from poisson data for 3d bioluminescence tomography,” Journal of scientificcomputing, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 519–535, 2012.
8.
M. B. Unlu and G. Gulsen, “Effects of the time dependence of a bioluminescent source on the tomographic reconstruction,” Applied Optics, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 799–806, 2008.
9.
L. Adhikari and R. F. Marcia, “Nonconvex relaxation for poisson intensity reconstruction,” in 2015 IEEE InternationalConference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), April 2015, pp. 1483–1487.
10.
L. V. Wang and H.-i. Wu, Biomedical Optics: Principles and Imaging. John Wiley Sons, 2012.
11.
S. R. Arridge, “Optical tomography in medical imaging,” Inverse Problems, vol. 15, no. 2, p. R41, 1999.
12.
R. D. Nowak and E. D. Kolaczyk, “A statistical multiscale framework for poisson inverse problems,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1811–1825, Aug 2000.
13.
A. Antoniadis and J. Bigot, “Poisson inverse problems,” The Annals of Statistics, pp. 2132–2158, 2006.
14.
A. Sawatzky, C. Brune, T. Kösters, F. Wübbeling, and M. Burger, “EM-TV methods for inverse problems with Poisson noise,” in Level Set and PDE Based Reconstruction Methods in Imaging. Springer 2013, pp. 71–142.
15.
R. LeVeque, Finite Difference Methods for Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations: Steady-State and Time-Dependent Problems, classics in applied mathematics ed. SIAM, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 7 2007.
16.
D. L. Snyder and M. I. Miller, “Random point processes in space and time,” Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1991.
17.
J. A. Fessler and A. O. Hero, “Penalized maximum-likelihood image reconstruction using space-alternating generalized em algorithms,” IEEE Trans. Image Processing, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1417–1429, 1995.
18.
Z. T. Harmany, R. F. Marcia, and R. M. Willett, “This is SPIRAL-TAP: Sparse Poisson intensity reconstruction algorithms - theory and practice,” IEEE Trans. Image Processing, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1084–1096, 2012.
19.
J. Barzilai and J. M. Borwein, “Two-point step size gradient methods,” IMA J. Numer. Anal., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 141–148, 1988.
20.
E. G. Birgin, J. M. Martínez, and M. Raydan, “Nonmonotone spectral projected gradient methods on convex sets,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1196 ─ 1211, 2000.
21.
S. J. Wright, R. D. Nowak, and M. A. T. Figueiredo, “Sparse reconstruction by separable approximation,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 2479–2493, 2009.
22.
W. Zuo, D. Meng, L. Zhang, X. Feng, and D. Zhang, “A generalized iterated shrinkage algorithm for non-convex sparse coding,” in 2013 IEEE InternationalConf. on Computer Vision, Dec 2013, pp. 217–224.
23.
A. Orkusyan, L. Adhikari, J. Valenzuela, and R. F. Marcia, “Analysis of p-norm regularized subproblem minimization for sparse photon-limited image recovery,” in 2016 IEEE InternationalConference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), March 2016.
24.
J. C. Baritaux and M. Unser, “A primal-dual reconstruction algorithm for fluorescence and bioluminescence tomography,” in 2011 IEEE InternationalSymposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2011, pp. 960–963.
