Abstract:
Quality monitoring and prediction plays a key role in improving product quality and achieving automated quality control in manufacturing processes such as the abrasion-re...Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
Quality monitoring and prediction plays a key role in improving product quality and achieving automated quality control in manufacturing processes such as the abrasion-resistant material manufacturing process. Traditional methods that rely on the use of first-principle models are difficult to formulate due to the increasing complexity and high dimensionality of manufacturing processes. Data-driven machine learning methods offer an efficient way to learn models for quality prediction, in which the meaningful process information can be learned directly from large amounts of measured process data at different stages. In this paper, based on data collected throughout an abrasion-resistant material manufacturing process, product quality prediction of burned balls is achieved with the use of the Support Vector Machine classification algorithm.
Date of Conference: 15-18 May 2016
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 03 November 2016
ISBN Information:
References is not available for this document.
Contents Select All
1.
J. Gooch, Encyclopedic dictionary of polymers New York : Springer, 2007.
2.
S. Cho, S. Asfour, A. Onar and N. Kaundinya, “Tool breakage detection using support vector machine learning in a milling process ”, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 241–249, 2005.
3.
B. Yang, W. Hwang, D. Kim and A. Chit Tan, “Condition classification of small reciprocating compressor for refrigerators using artificial neural networks and support vector machines ”, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 371–390, 2005.
4.
A. Kusiak and C. Kurasek, “Data mining of printed-circuit board defects ”, IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 191–196, 2001.
5.
A. Kusiak, “Decomposition in data mining: an industrial case study ”, IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 345–353, 2000.
6.
J. Baek, C. Kim and S. Kim, “Online learning of the cause-and-effect knowledge of a manufacturing process ”, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 40, no. 14, pp. 3275–3290, 2002.
7.
B. Bakir, “Defect Cause Modeling with Decision Tree and Regression Analysis ”, International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering vol. 2, no. 12, 2008.
8.
W. Chen, A. Lee, W. Deng and K. Liu, “The implementation of neural network for semiconductor PECVD process ”, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1148–1153, 2007.
9.
G. Koksal, i. Batmaz and M. Testik, “A review of data mining applications for quality improvement in manufacturing industry ”, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 13448–13467, 2011.
10.
S. Sain and V. Vapnik, “The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory ”, Technometrics, vol. 38, no. 4, p. 409, 1996.
11.
M. Galar, A. Fernández E. Barrenechea, H. Bustince and F. Herrera, “An overview of ensemble methods for binary classifiers in multi-class problems: Experimental study on one-vs-one and one-vs-all schemes ”, Pattern Recognition, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1761–1776, 2011.
12.
C. Chang and C. Lin, “LIBSVM ”, TIST, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–27, 2011.
13.
M. Sokolova, N. Japkowicz and S. Szpakowicz, “Beyond Accuracy, F-Score and ROC: A Family of Discriminant Measures for Performance Evaluation ”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 1015–1021, 2006
