I. Introduction
Multiple input multiple output (MIMO) communication opens new directions and possibilities for Cognitive Radio (CR) networks [1]–[7]. In particular, in underlay CR networks, MIMO technology enables the SU to transmit a significant amount of power simultaneously in the same band as the Primary User (PU) without interfering with it, if the SU utilizes separate spatial dimensions than the PU. This spatial separation requires that the interference channel from the SU to the PU be known to the SU. Thus, acquiring this knowledge, or operating without it, is a major topic of active research in CR [6], [8]–[15] and in other fields [16]. We consider MIMO primary and secondary systems defined as follows: we assume a flat-fading MIMO channel with one PU and one SU, as depicted in Fig. 1. Let be the channel matrix between the SU's transmitter and the PU's receiver, hereafter referred to as the SU-Tx and PU-Rx, respectively. In the underlay CR paradigm, SUs are constrained not to inflict “harmful” interference on the PU-Rx. This can be achieved if the SU restricts its signal to lie within the null space of ; however, this is only possible if the SU knows . The optimal power allocation in the case where the SU knows the matrix in addition to its own Channel State Information (CSI) was derived by Zhang and Liang [1]. For the case of multiple SUs, Scutari et al. [3] formulated a competitive game between the secondary users. Assuming that the interference matrix to the PU is known by each SU, they derived conditions for the existence and uniqueness of a Nash Equilibrium point to the game. Zhang et al. [9] were the first to take into consideration the fact that the interference matrix may not be perfectly known (but is partially known) to the SU. They proposed robust beamforming to assure compliance with the interference constraint of the PU while maximizing the SU's throughput. Another work on the case of an unknown interference channel with known probability distribution is due to Zhang and So [11], who optimized the SU's throughput under a constraint on the maximum probability that the interference to the PU is above a threshold.
Our cognitive radio scheme. is unknown to the secondary transmitter and is a stationary noise (which may include stationary interference). The interference from the SU, , is treated as noise; i.e., there is no interference cancellation.