The figure compares the constrained (GA_CT) and unconstrained (GA) optimized cases for all freestream wind speeds (U∞) between cut-in and rated, and across all studied wi...
Abstract:
Pitching turbine blades into the wind increases the thrust coefficient, C_{T} , which increases the power generated by the wind turbine. However, excessive C_{T} i...Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
Pitching turbine blades into the wind increases the thrust coefficient, C_{T} , which increases the power generated by the wind turbine. However, excessive C_{T} increments beyond rotor mean wind speed C_{T} -equivalent, tend to cause overexertion and increased loads. Consequently, the rated operational lifetime of the turbine is reduced. This study uses a high-fidelity 2-D Gaussian wake model and an augmented version of Frandsen’s turbulence intensity (TI) model to simulate a hexagonally deployed wind plant (WP) operation. Turbines’ axial-induction factor \alpha is optimised using Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO) and Genetic Algorithm (GA), to maximise WP power and annual energy production (AEP), with constrains on individual turbine C_{T} values to remain within rotor wind speed equivalent based on turbine’s thrust curve. At a 5D minimum turbine-to-turbine (T-2-T) separation distance, results show that C_{T} constraints on individual turbines increased the wind speed range of healthy operations by up to 66.67% considering extreme loads. AEP gains reduced from 11.91% and 13.25% (optimised without constraints), to approximately 7.59% and 5.74% (with constraints), when compared to the corresponding 5D Base case (non-optimised and unconstrained), using PSO and GA, respectively. The study also shows that WP power maximisation can increase turbulence intensity levels within the WP especially if turbines are tightly deployed. The outcome of this study has implications for new wind farm layouts and wind plant power optimization.
The figure compares the constrained (GA_CT) and unconstrained (GA) optimized cases for all freestream wind speeds (U∞) between cut-in and rated, and across all studied wi...
Published in: IEEE Access ( Volume: 12)