By Topic

On adaptive detectors for two-input systems

Sign In

Full text access may be available.

To access full text, please use your member or institutional sign in.

Formats Non-Member Member
$31 $13
Learn how you can qualify for the best price for this item!
Become an IEEE Member or Subscribe to
IEEE Xplore for exclusive pricing!
close button

puzzle piece

IEEE membership options for an individual and IEEE Xplore subscriptions for an organization offer the most affordable access to essential journal articles, conference papers, standards, eBooks, and eLearning courses.

Learn more about:

IEEE membership

IEEE Xplore subscriptions

2 Author(s)
Kanefsky, M. ; Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA ; Thomas, J.B.

This paper considers the class of detection problems having two inputs containing a common (signal) component. If a complete statistical description of these inputs is available, then well-known parametric techniques yield optimum detectors. If less is known about the inputs, various nonparametric schemes can be utilized. It is usually assumed that the inputs are stationary, but it is often possible to consider nonstationary inputs which can be regarded as stationary during any given test interval (quasi-stationary). Under these conditions, adaptive procedures may be devised to estimate some parameter associated with the input processes, permitting adjustment of detection threshold. In this paper adaptive parametric detectors of this type are analyzed and compared to a nonparametric detector [polarity coincidence correlator (PCC)] under the assumption of quasi-stationary inputs. In addition an adaptive PCC is shown to be nonparametric for a wider class of input processes then the original PCC and is at least as efficient as the original PCC under the restricted input assumptions. Although the parametric detectors are superior when used with the input processes for which they were designed, the nonparametric detectors are easier to implement and can be markedly superior under departures from input assumptions.

Published in:

Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on  (Volume:10 ,  Issue: 4 )