1 Introduction
Social media are prevalent in today's computer-mediated communication (CMC). Yet scholars are inconclusive in understanding the relationship between social media activities of brands with their corresponding economic outcomes [1]. The present study investigated how social media activities surrounding U.S. television (TV) network programs relate to their performance ratings. Specifically we asked the question: how does audience engagement in social media directly correlate with the TV program's performance? Anecdotally there seem to be a positive parallel. For example, we examined two TV shows: Franklin & Bash and The Walking Dead. Franklin & Bash was doing poorly in ratings at the time of our study and ended its first season with a. 25 average rating. The Walking Dead, however, did well and was ultimately renewed for another season (ending with 8.65 average rating). Twitter paints a very similar picture: Franklin & Bash has, on its official Twitter account, a total of 1,829 tweets and an abysmal 23,164 followers while The Walking Dead has 65,071 tweets with a whopping 3,094,523 followers—an enormous amount of social media buzz. While this anecdotal example confirmed our suspicion, a more rigorous test was called for. We thus put forward the following questions in relation to ratings and social media: How does the performance of a TV program relate to or be reliant on posts from the official account itself? Does engaging with audience help garner more attention subsequently increasing number of viewers and ratings?