Abstract:
On the contrary to the digital world, no coverage definition exists in the Analog/Mixed-Signal (AMS) context. As digital coverage helps digital designers and verification...Show MoreMetadata
Abstract:
On the contrary to the digital world, no coverage definition exists in the Analog/Mixed-Signal (AMS) context. As digital coverage helps digital designers and verification engineers to evaluate their verification progress, analog designers do not have such metrics. This paper proposes a set of different analog coverage metrics, which improve the confidence in AMS circuit verification. We will demonstrate, that no single overall coverage metric exists. However, as with digital coverage, the proposed analog coverage metrics could substantially help in rating the verification process. Illustrated by a complex AMS circuit example we will explore the limits of analog coverage methodologies as well as the benefits on different levels of abstraction ranging from transistor level up to system level.
Published in: 2017 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits & Systems (DDECS)
Date of Conference: 19-21 April 2017
Date Added to IEEE Xplore: 29 May 2017
ISBN Information:
Electronic ISSN: 2473-2117