Evaluation of Various Defense Techniques Against Targeted Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning

Federated Learning (FL) allows individual clients to train a global model by aggregating local model updates each round. This results in collaborative model training while main-taining the privacy of clients' sensitive data. However, malicious clients can join the training process and train with poisoned data or send artificial model updates in targeted poisoning attacks. Many defenses to targeted poisoning attacks rely on anomaly-detection based metrics which remove participants that deviate from the majority. Similarly, aggregation-based defenses aim to reduce the impact of outliers, while L2-norm clipping tries to scale down the impact of malicious models. However, oftentimes these defenses misidentify benign clients as malicious or only work under specific attack conditions. In our paper, we examine the effectiveness of two anomaly -detection metrics on three different aggregation methods, in addition to the presence of L2-norm clipping and weight selection, across two different types of attacks. We also combine different defenses in order to examine their interaction and examine each defense when no attack is present. We found minimum aggregation to be the most effective defense against label-flipping attacks, whereas both minimum aggregation and geometric median worked well against distributed backdoor attacks. Using random weight selection significantly deteriorated defenses against both attacks, whereas the use of clipping made little difference. Finally, the main task accuracy was directly correlated with the BA in the label-flipping attack and generally was close to the MA in benign scenarios. However, in the DBA the MA and BA are inversely correlated and the MA fluctuates greatly.