Root Zone Soil Moisture Comparisons: AirMOSS, SMERGE, and SMAP

A long-standing goal in the terrestrial remote sensing community has been the development of a root-zone soil moisture (RZSM) product based on microwave radar or radiometry observations. For example, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA’s) Airborne Microwave Observatory of Subcanopy and Surface (AirMOSS) mission between 2012 and 2015 served as an airborne testbed for the development of RZSM estimates acquired from a 420–440 MHz (P-band) radar. Results from the AirMOSS mission suggest that P-band backscatter can be inverted to provide a direct measurement of 0- to 40-cm RZSM. However, whether AirMOSS RZSM is inherently more robust than indirect RZSM estimates including soil MERGE (SMERGE) and Soil Moisture Active Passive Level 4 (SMAP L4) is not clear. SMERGE and SMAP L4 leverage surface (2–5 cm depth), higher-frequency microwave observations (C- and L-bands) via data fusion (DFus) and data assimilation (DA) techniques, respectively. Therefore, the comparisons of these products are warranted and were based on bias, root mean square error (RMSE), and unbiased root mean standard deviation (ubRMSD) metrics. Comparisons also were made against
in situ
observations providing additional context. The seven AirMOSS sites within the contiguous United States (CONUS) were examined. Overall, direct AirMOSS RZSM measurements, based on the original retrieval algorithms, did not outperform indirect SMERGE and SMAP L4 RZSM estimates. These results provide insight into the viability of achieving enhanced RZSM accuracy via deployment of a spaceborne P-band radar.