Decision on Maximal Permissiveness of Linear Constraints via Structural Analysis of a Subclass of Petri Nets

A maximally permissive (or optimal) supervisory control of an automated manufacturing system (AMS) modeled by Petri nets (PNs) can be usually implemented by imposing constraints in the form of a set of linear inequalities. To find such a set of linear constraints, in the existing work, an integer linear programming (ILP) problem is generally formulated and solved for some dominant markings obtained by reachability analysis and vector covering theory, which is computationally inefficient due to the combinatorial nature of solving ILPs to decide the coefficients of optimal linear constraints. This paper addresses the deadlock prevention problem for AMSs by developing efficient methods to reduce the computational overhead through the establishment of conditions on deciding the maximal permissiveness of linear constraints imposed on a system. By taking the advantage of structural properties of a PN model under consideration, we identify the most part of minimal covered illegal markings that can be optimally controlled via policies obtained by specific linear inequality constraints. Also, algorithms are developed to implement the proposed policies. The proposed approach can verify the optimality of a linear constraint efficiently without solving ILP problems. A linear programming method is developed to deal with the markings that cannot be processed by the proposed structural analysis. It is shown that for the considered class of PNs, called system of simple sequential processes with resources (S³PR), no mixed ILP problem needs to solve and the computational burden is dramatically reduced. Two examples are employed to demonstrate the efficiency of the developed method.