Comments on “Coverage Analysis of Multiuser Visible Light Communication Networks”

We show that two point processes Φ
_eq
and Φ
_eq2
, which were claimed by Yin and Haas to be equivalent in terms of their signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR), are, in fact, not SINR equivalent. We discuss the importance of this distinction and explain how the correction impacts the results derived in the original paper.