Criteria Making in Role Negotiation

Role negotiation is a pivotal step in the role-based collaboration (RBC) process. There are many factors to be considered when decision makers set up criteria to evaluate group performance and agents’ abilities. In this paper, we investigate the applications of three traditional multicriteria decision making methods into role negotiation of RBC, i.e., simple additive weighting, multiplication exponent weighting, and weighted distance. The goal is to acquire ideal and satisfactory methods to set up the evaluation criteria for the role negotiation task. The main contributions of this paper include: 1) a method of generating the matrix of agent qualifications, with a discrete, usually, limited, and finite set of prespecified attributes and values; 2) the upper and lower thresholds of a role’s ability requirements, which are critical parameters for a workable team and its performance; and 3) the potential influences of
specialist agents
and
generalist agents
on the group performance. The proposed methods are verified by simulation experiments. The simulation results show that the proposed methods are reasonable, feasible, and practical.