Multi-abstraction level signature generation and comparison based on radiation single event upset

Whereas the use of FPGAs in aerospace applications is increasing, concerns about its sensitivity to radiations more particularly the single event upsets (SEU) in SRAM-based FPGA is enhanced as well. To ensure hardness assurance, radiation sensitivity should be estimated at different stages of the system development cycle. In this paper, we present a multi-abstraction level signature generation based on fault injection using fault simulation, fault emulation and radiation testing in order to build an accurate representation of the design faulty behavior. These signatures, which can be seen as high-level fault models, help the designer make decisions on the use (or not) of rad-hard components and the adequate mitigation technique very early in the design process. Results from the different types of signatures are compared. It first shows that the type of resources used to implement a module (e.g. multiplier) may influence its behavior when affected by an SEU. It also reveals that most of the faulty values observed during radiation testing appear in the simulation-based and emulation-based signatures, but that their frequency of occurrence can differ. Finally, limitations of some commercial tools to identify critical bits are investigated.