A comparison of deterministic and stochastic approaches for allocating spatially dependent tasks in micro-aerial vehicle collectives

We compare our previously developed deterministic [7] and stochastic [3], [4] strategies for allocating tasks in robotic swarms1 consisting of very large populations of highly resource-constrained robots. We study our two task allocation approaches in a simulated scenario in which a collective of insect-inspired micro-aerial vehicles (MAVs) must produce a specified spatial distribution of pollination activity over a crop field. We investigate the approaches' requirements, advantages, and disadvantages under realistic conditions of error in robot localization, navigation, and sensing in simulation. Our results show that the deterministic approach, which requires region-based robot navigation, yields higher task progress in all cases. For robots without such navigation capabilities, the stochastic approach is a feasible alternative, and its resulting task progress is less sensitive to error in localization, error in navigation, and a combination of high error in localization, navigation, and sensing.