Comments, with reply, on 'Structured flowcharts outperform pseudocode: an experimental comparison'

The commentor contends that the title of the above mentioned article (ibid., vol.7, no.5, p.28-36, Sept. 1989) is misleading if Fig. 2-4 give a true representation of the information given to the experiment's subjects. He states that the experiment seems to compare flowcharts to a form of poetry that has yet to become popular. The author apologizes for not fully explaining why he used the particular algorithms in those figures and explains why what he did makes good experimental sense.<
>