The effects of channel errors on coordinated and non-coordinated medium access control protocols

In this paper, we investigate the effects of channel noise on the performance of coordinated and non-coordinated MAC protocols. Comparative evaluations of these protocols under a perfect channel assumption have shown that coordinated MAC protocols, which regulate channel access locally, outperform non-coordinated channel access schemes in terms of energy efficiency and throughput. However, coordinated MAC protocols are more vulnerable than non-coordinated MAC protocols to channel noise due to their dependence on the robustness of the control traffic. In order to observe the degradation in performance of a coordinated MAC protocol (MH-TRACE), we investigate the impact of losing control packets. Furthermore, the performance in terms of throughput, delay, and energy efficiency of both coordinated (MH-TRACE) and non-coordinated (IEEE 802.11) MAC protocols is explored using a general error model that takes into account the length of the packets. Our results show that despite its higher level of vulnerability, the coordinated MAC protocol's performance is superior to the performance of the non-coordinated MAC protocol even when error rates are high.