Impact of Government Dominance Over Blockchain Systems

This paper investigates the possible risks of government intervention and control over blockchain technologies. Investigating the impacts of regulatory control on blockchain systems and whether it guarantees security and compliance or not helps one to determine if such dominance limits or guarantees innovation. By means of case studies of government-owned blockchain applications, this study investigates the equilibrium between decentralisation and governance. It studies possible hazards include censorship, less user control, and more monitoring. The study emphasises the requirement of a hybrid strategy wherein regulatory control guarantees security without endangering the dependability of distributed systems. The government should interact with blockchain and develop a hybrid model combining PSO and ACO if it is to maximise machine learning systems. Among the performance criteria the model considers when examining the effects of government policies are transaction speed, security, scalability, and energy economy. Apart from strengthening network resilience, the hybrid model facilitates decision-making and future intervention prediction. While still permitting some degree of decentralisation, the approach might assist governments and blockchain networks make choices. Stricher rules, according to a Python code visualisation, increase security, lower scalability, increase energy economy, and slow down transactions.