Experimental Assessment of a Dual Super-Twisting Control Technique of Variable-Speed Multi-Rotor Wind Turbine Systems

Experimental work using Hardware-in-the-loop simulation is performed in this article for a power system based on multi-rotor wind energy for power generation. Power is generated using a doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG), where the suggested approach to regulate the energy is different from the direct power command (DPC) in terms of idea and structure, even though the same equations are used to estimate the powers. Two parallel super-twisting controls are used to control the power, and modified space vector modulation (MSVM) is used to operate the rotor side converter. The designed command is unrelated to the system’s mathematical model and uses only a few gains, which makes it an effective and distinctive effectiveness compared to the DPC based on the super-twisting controller (DPC-STC). Also, simplicity, robustness, and ease of application are the most notable characteristics of the suggested command. Moreover, an uncontrolled grid-side converter was used to demonstrate the efficacy and competence of the suggested command in ameliorating the features of the designed power system. The suggested command was first verified in MATLAB, and the results were confirmed using experimental work, where Hardware-in-the-loop using the dSPACE 1104 was used for this purpose. In this work, the results obtained with the DPC-STC technique were compared in terms of undulations and oscillation minimization ratio, total harmonic distortion (THD) of stream, and steady-state error (SSE) value. The designed command minimized the THD of current with an efficiency of 45.94%, 46.95%, and 45.93% in the first test, second test, and third test, respectively. Also, the active power undulations were minimized compared to the DPC-STC by58.33%, 45.60%, and 44.88% in the first test, second test, and third test, respectively. The SSE of reactive power was also reduced by 68%, 71.32%, and 70.80% in the first test, second test, and third test, respectively. These ratios indicate the effectiveness, ability, and efficiency of the suggested command to ameliorate the efficiency of the power system.