I. Introduction
Money laundering activity is associated with various types of crime, and efficient detection of this activity strongly contributes to the prevention and prosecution of those crimes. The true scale of this activity is difficult to estimate accurately: one estimate [1] puts the proceeds at £4.5B annually for drug supply and £5.9B for fraud. There are several categories of money laundering (ML), including the use of property, gambling, and businesses to obfuscate the true source of funds. This paper concentrates on the use of proxy or ‘mule’ accounts for the swift transfer and ‘cash out’ of illegally obtained funds. The precise manner in which these funds are obtained is not the subject of this paper, but typical examples include deceiving the bank customer into transferring funds, theft by re-ordering and then intercepting bank authentication devices, or re-registering the phone number or postal address associated with the bank account. These funds are then typically transferred again, possibly multiple times and into smaller fragments, so that the parties involved in this organised crime can securely access them.