Is Human-Robot Interaction More Competitive Between Groups Than Between Individuals?

As robots, both individually and in groups, become more prevalent in everyday contexts (e.g., schools, workplaces, educational and caregiving institutions), it is possible that they will be perceived as outgroups, or come into competition for resources with humans. Research indicates that some of the psychological effects of intergroup interaction common in humans translate to human-robot interaction (HRI). In this paper, we examine how intergroup competition, like that among humans, translates to HRI. Specifically, we examined how Number of Humans (1, 3) and Number of Robots (1, 3) affect behavioral competition on dilemma tasks and survey ratings of perceived threat, emotion, and motivation (fear, greed, and outperformance). We also examined the effect of perceived group entitativity (i.e., cohesiveness) on competition motivation. Like in social psychological literature, these results indicate that groups of humans (especially entitative groups) showed more greed-based motivation and competition toward robots than individual humans did. However, we did not find evidence that number of robots had an effect on fear-based motivation or competition against them unless the robot groups were perceived as highly entitative. Our data also show the intriguing finding that participants displayed more fear of and competed slightly more against robots that matched their number. Future research should more deeply examine this novel pattern of results compared to one-on-one HRI and typical group dynamics in social psychology.