BLISS: Balancing Performance, Fairness and Complexity in Memory Access Scheduling

In a multicore system, applications running on different cores interfere at main memory. This inter-application interference degrades overall system performance and unfairly slows down applications. Prior works have developed application-aware memory request schedulers to tackle this problem. State-of-the-art application-aware memory request schedulers prioritize memory requests of applications that are vulnerable to interference, by ranking individual applications based on their memory access characteristics and enforcing a total rank order. In this paper, we observe that state-of-the-art application-aware memory schedulers have two major shortcomings. First, such schedulers trade off hardware complexity in order to achieve high performance or fairness, since ranking applications individually with a total order based on memory access characteristics leads to high hardware cost and complexity. Such complexity could prevent the scheduler from meeting the stringent timing requirements of state-of-the-art DDR protocols. Second, ranking can unfairly slow down applications that are at the bottom of the ranking stack, thereby sometimes leading to high slowdowns and low overall system performance. To overcome these shortcomings, we propose the Blacklisting Memory Scheduler (BLISS), which achieves high system performance and fairness while incurring low hardware cost and complexity. BLISS design is based on two new observations. First, we find that, to mitigate interference, it is sufficient to separate applications into only two groups, one containing applications that are vulnerable to interference and another containing applications that cause interference, instead of ranking individual applications with a total order. Vulnerable-to-interference group is prioritized over the interference-causing group. Second, we show that this grouping can be efficiently performed by simply counting the number of consecutive requests served from each application. We evaluate BLISS across a wide variety of workloads and system configurations and compare its performance and hardware complexity (via RTL implementations), with five state-of-the-art memory schedulers. Our evaluations show that BLISS achieves 5 percent better system performance and 25 percent better fairness than the best-performing previous memory scheduler while greatly reducing critical path latency and hardware area cost of the memory scheduler (by 79 and 43 percent, respectively), thereby achieving a good trade-off between performance, fairness and hardware complexity.