Rethinking Exoskeleton Simulation-Based Design: The Effect of Using Different Cost Functions

Designing an exoskeleton that can improve user capabilities is a challenging task, and most designs rely on experiments to achieve this goal. A different approach is to use simulation-based designs to determine optimal device parameters. Most of these simulations use full trajectory tracking limb kinematics during a natural gait as a reference. However, exoskeletons typically change the natural gait kinematics of the user. Other types of simulations assume that human gait is optimized for a cost function that combines several objectives, such as the cost of transport, injury prevention, and stabilization. In this study, we use a 2D OpenSim model consisting of 10 degrees of freedom and considering 18 muscles, together with the Moco optimization tool, to investigate the differences between these two approaches with respect to running with a passive knee exoskeleton. Utilizing this model, we test the effect of a full trajectory tracking objective with different weights (representing the importance of the objective in the optimization cost function) and show that when using weights that are typically used in the literature, there is no deviation from the experimental data. Next, we develop a multi-objective cost function with foot clearance term based on peak knee angle during swing, that achieves trajectories similar (RMSE=7.4 deg) to experimental running data. Finally, we investigate the effect of different parameters in the design of a clutch-based passive knee exoskeleton (1.5 kg at each leg) and find that a design that utilizes a 2.5 Nm/deg spring achieves an improvement of up to 8% in net metabolic energy. Our results show that tracking objectives in the cost function, even with a low weight, hinders the simulation’s ability to change the gait trajectory. Thus, there is a need for other predictive simulation methods for exoskeletons.