By Topic

IEEE Quick Preview
  • Abstract

SECTION I

INTRODUCTION

Accurate knowledge of the position of an object or person is important for a multitude of applications, while the global positioning system (GPS) works well in many cases, there are numerous situations, particularly indoors, where GPS is unavailable or the accuracy it provides is not high enough. Despite extensive research on RF-based solutions, the major challenge of strong multipath interference means that there is no accurate, low cost, low power system available [1], [2].

Because of their energy efficiency, white light emitting diodes are rapidly replacing conventional fluorescent and incandescent lights. Unlike conventional light sources, white LEDs designed for illumination can be modulated at frequencies up to 20 MHz [3], [4]. This offers an unprecedented opportunity to create an entirely new type of positioning system based on the light emitted by these LEDs, and has inspired rapidly growing interest in using these LEDs both to transmit high speed data [5]– [6] [7] [8] [9] [10][11], and more recently also for localization [12]– [13] [14] [15] [16] [17][18].

A positioning system based on white lighting LEDs has many advantages. Lights are typically placed at regular intervals on the ceiling, and have line of sight (LOS) to most positions within a room. Multipath transmission presents much less of a challenge in optical systems than RF, because if reflected components are present, they typically have much lower power than the LOS path [8]. As optical signals cannot pass through opaque obstacles, LED based positioning is free of interference from other systems working in different rooms. Installing a white LED based positioning system is potentially almost as “simple as changing a light bulb.” The advantages of positioning with LEDs also include low-cost frontends, simultaneous illumination and localization, and environmental friendliness. Because of the many advantages of LEDs, there are an increasing number of papers published describing a variety of schemes for indoor positioning using LEDs [12]– [13] [14] [15] [16] [17][18]. The ranging techniques used in these papers include received signal strength (RSS) [12]– [13][14], [17], [18], time difference of arrival (TDOA) [15], and phase difference of arrival (PDOA) [16]. Most of the papers published so far have presented either theoretical analyses or simulation results for very specific idealized scenarios in which parameters such as the optical power transmitted and the radiation pattern of each LED are precisely known. For the systems using TDOA or PDOA perfect synchronization has been assumed. For these idealized cases, very low estimation errors have been reported [12], [13], [15].

While the research so far on lighting LED-based systems has shown that accurate localization may be possible, little has been published on the theoretical limits. The determination of this limit will allow optimization of the parameters governing optical positioning systems.

A widely used approach to evaluate the theoretical accuracy in estimation theory is the Cramer–Rao bound (CRB), which is a lower bound on the mean square error of an unbiased estimate [19]– [20][21]. The CRB has been extensively studied for ranging using RF wireless signals. However, as discussed later, these results cannot be directly applied to optical wireless systems using LED transmitters. For RF systems, specific results have been calculated for the time-of-arrival (TOA) of low pass and bandpass signals [20]. These show that the CRB depends on the effective bandwidth of the signal, which in turn depends on the signal waveform. A number of papers have considered the problem of determining the optimum signal waveform for RF systems [22], [23]. In [22], the optimum waveform is found to have energy spectral density which is a Dirac delta function. Unfortunately, this energy density is shown not to correspond to any realizable waveform of finite energy [22]. In the work based on the GPS system [23], a systematic method for designing waveforms of the type used in GPS is presented. However, the resulting waveform is bipolar and therefore not applicable to intensity-modulated direct-detection (IM/DD), and the restriction to GPS type signals is not relevant to indoor localization using LEDs.

While the work on RF provides useful background, these results are not directly applicable to the white LED cases. Modulation and reception of the optical signals in these systems are fundamentally different from the RF case. With an LED transmitter, it is the intensity (not the field) of the electromagnetic light that is modulated. As a result, the transmitted signal must be nonnegative. Because of the properties of photodiodes, the current of the electrical signal after demodulation is proportional to the intensity of the received optical power. This is known as an IM/DD system. Because in the optical domain Formula$x\left(t \right)$ is represented by intensity, but in the electrical domain it is represented by current, the average power of the optical signal is given by Formula$E\left\{{x\left(t \right)} \right\}$ while the average power of the demodulated electrical signal is given by Formula$E\left\{{x^2 \left(t \right)} \right\}$ [6]. In the literature, these two quantities are often referred to as optical power and electrical power, respectively.

In this paper, we analyze TOA-based ranging using LED transmitters. This is particularly novel because there is no published work on CRB for TOA positioning systems using IM/DD signals. We consider the particular case where Formula$x\left(t \right)$ is a dc-biased windowed sinusoid. In contrast to the existing literature on CRB, due to the system we are analyzing, the dc bias is required to meet the nonnegativity constraint, while a window is required to create a signal from which TOA can be calculated, this latter condition also allows the use of the CRB [24]. Research in this new area is likely to evolve in the same way as CRB analysis of RF systems has done, where initially specific waveforms and ideal conditions were considered. We anticipate that, as with CRB calculations for RF, subsequent research will consider more general waveforms and the effect of nuisance parameters [25] such as the effect of errors in synchronization, and the stability of the LEDs. In this paper, we use a nonnegative “smooth” window which has a finite mean-square frequency deviation [21], i.e., Formula$\int_{- \infty }^\infty {f^2 \left\vert {W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} < \infty$, where Formula$W\left(f \right)$ is the Fourier transform of the window function Formula$w\left(t \right)$. By Parseval's law, this implies the derivative of the window function is square-integrable. The sinusoidal component is chosen to have a frequency Formula$f_c$ which is much larger than the bandwidth of the window function. Signals of this form have been described in the radar literature, where it has been shown that they have an effective bandwidth that is approximately equal to the frequency of the sinusoid [21]. As a result TOA measurements based on these signals can have a very low CRB.

In Section II, expressions are derived for the CRB in terms of the properties of the signal and the noise at the receiver after optical to electrical conversion. In Section III, a typical indoor scenario using white lighting LEDs for localization is described. In Section IV, numerical values of the CRB are calculated for this indoor scenario using typical parameter values. It shows that CRBs in the order of centimeters or millimeters can be achieved for realistic parameter values. This demonstrates a significant potential for very accurate indoor localization based on white lighting LEDs.

SECTION II

CRAMER-RAO BOUND

We now derive expressions for the Cramer–Rao bound for ranging estimates based on intensity modulated signals transmitted by LEDs. We assume LOS with no multipath transmission, so the received optical signal is a delayed attenuated version of the transmitted ranging signal Formula$x\left(t \right)$. Thus, the received signal after optical to electrical conversion is given by FormulaTeX Source$$r\left(t \right) = \alpha R_p x\left({t - \tau } \right) + n\left(t \right) \eqno{\hbox{(1)}}$$ where Formula$\alpha$ is the attenuation of the optical channel, Formula$\tau$ is the time taken for the light to travel from the transmitter to the receiver, Formula$R_p$ is the responsivity of the photodiode, and Formula$n\left(t \right)$ is the shot noise. We assume that Formula$R_p$ and Formula$\alpha$ are constant over the optical bandwidth of the ranging signal. Due to the properties of an IM/DD system, Formula$\alpha$ is real and positive [6], [8]. We assume that the noise Formula$n\left(t \right)$ is accurately modeled as additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) with single-sided spectral density Formula$N_0$ which is added in the electrical domain in the receiver. The distance between the transmitter and the receiver can be calculated from the delay using FormulaTeX Source$$d = c\tau \eqno{\hbox{(2)}}$$ where Formula$c$ is the speed of light.

We consider the case where Formula$x\left(t \right)$ is a dc-biased windowed sinusoid waveform with duration Formula$T$ and is given by FormulaTeX Source$$\eqalignno{x(t) &= w(t)v(t) \cr &= w\left(t \right) + w\left(t \right)\cos \left({2\pi f_c t} \right) &\hbox{(3)}}$$ where FormulaTeX Source$$v\left(t \right) = 1 + \cos \left({2\pi f_c t} \right)\eqno{\hbox{(4)}}$$ and Formula$f_c$ is the frequency of the sinusoid. Note that the first term of (3) is a baseband component and the second term is a bandpass component centered at Formula$f_c$.

The accuracy of ranging using TOA can be lower bounded by the CRB, which for Formula$r\left(t \right)$ as defined in (1) is given by [19]– [20][21] FormulaTeX Source$$\sqrt {{\rm var} ({\hat d})} \ge {c \over {2\sqrt 2 \pi \alpha R_p \sqrt {{{E_x } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{E_x } {N_0}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {N_0}}} \beta}} \eqno{\hbox{(5)}}$$ where Formula$\hat d$ is the estimate of the distance (range) from LED to the receiver, Formula$E_x$ is the electrical energy of the signal Formula$x\left(t \right)$, which is defined as Formula$E_x = \int_0^T {x^2 \left(t \right)} dt$, and Formula$\beta$ is the effective bandwidth of the signal Formula$x\left(t \right)$ defined as FormulaTeX Source$$\beta ^2 = {{\int_{- \infty }^\infty {f^2 \left\vert {X\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} \over \int_{- \infty }^\infty {\left\vert {X\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df}}}. \eqno{\hbox{(6)}}$$ From (3) and using the properties of products of signals, this can be expressed as FormulaTeX Source$$\beta ^2 = {{\int_{- \infty }^\infty {f^2 \left\vert {V\left(f \right) \otimes W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} \over \int_{- \infty }^\infty {\left\vert {V\left(f \right) \otimes W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df}}} \eqno{\hbox{(7)}}$$ where Formula$X\left(f \right)$ and Formula$V\left(f \right)$ are the Fourier transforms of Formula$x\left(t \right)$ and Formula$v\left(t \right)$, respectively, and “Formula$\otimes$” denotes convolution. As Formula$v\left(t \right)$ is a sinusoidal signal plus a unit dc bias, its Fourier transform is given by Formula$V\left(f \right) = \delta \left(f \right) + {1 \over 2}\left[{\delta \left({f + f_c } \right) + \delta \left({f - f_c } \right)} \right]$, where Formula$\delta \left(\cdot \right)$ is the Dirac delta function having the property: Formula$W\left(f \right) \otimes \delta \left(f \right) = W\left(f \right)$ and Formula$W\left(f \right) \otimes \delta \left({f \pm f_c } \right) = W\left({f \pm f_c } \right)$.

Therefore, (7) can be expressed as FormulaTeX Source$$\eqalignno{\beta ^2 &= {{\int_{- \infty }^\infty {f^2 \left\vert {U\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} \over \int_{- \infty }^\infty {\left\vert {U\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df}}} \cr &= {{\int_{- \infty }^\infty {f^2 U\left(f \right)U^* \left(f \right)df} \over \int_{- \infty }^\infty {U\left(f \right)U^* \left(f \right)df}}} &\hbox{(8)}}$$ where the superscript “∗” denotes complex conjugate and FormulaTeX Source$$U\left(f \right) = W\left(f \right) + {{W\left({f - f_c } \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{W\left({f - f_c } \right)} 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2} + {{W\left({f + f_c } \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{W\left({f + f_c } \right)} 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}.\eqno{\hbox{(9)}}$$ Note that the window function Formula$w\left(t \right)$ is a narrowband signal whose bandwidth is much lower than the frequency Formula$f_c$, so Formula$W\left(f \right)W\left({f \pm f_c } \right) \approx 0$ and Formula$W\left({f + f_c } \right)W\left({f - f_c } \right) \approx 0$. Using this and with a simple change of variable, the numerator and the denominator of (8) can be simplified as FormulaTeX Source$$\eqalignno{&\int_{- \infty }^\infty {U\left(f \right)U^* \left(f \right)df} = \int_{- \infty }^\infty {\left\vert {W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} \cr &\quad +{1 \over 4}\int_{- \infty }^\infty {\left\vert {W\left({f - f_c } \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} + {1 \over 4}\int_{- \infty }^\infty {\left\vert {W\left({f + f_c } \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} \cr &= \int_{- \infty }^\infty {\left\vert {W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} \cr &\quad+{1 \over 4}\int_{- \infty }^\infty {\left\vert {W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} + {1 \over 4}\int_{- \infty }^\infty {\left\vert {W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} \cr &= {3 \over 2}\int_{- \infty }^\infty {\left\vert {W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} &\hbox{(10)}}$$ and FormulaTeX Source$$\eqalignno{&\int_{- \infty }^\infty {f^2 U\left(f \right)U^* \left(f \right)df} \cr &= \int_{- \infty }^\infty {f^2 \left\vert {W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} + {1 \over 4}\int_{- \infty }^\infty {f^2 \left\vert {W\left({f - f_c } \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} \cr &\quad + {1 \over 4}\int_{- \infty }^\infty {f^2 \left\vert {W\left({f + f_c } \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} \cr &= \int_{- \infty }^\infty {f^2 \left\vert {W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} + {1 \over 4}\int_{- \infty }^\infty {\left({f + f_c } \right)^2 \left\vert {W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} \cr &\quad + {1 \over 4}\int_{- \infty }^\infty {\left({f - f_c } \right)^2 \left\vert {W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} \cr &= {3 \over 2}\int_{- \infty }^\infty {f^2 \left\vert {W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} + {{f_c^2 } \over 2}\int_{- \infty }^\infty {\left\vert {W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} &\hbox{(11)}}$$ respectively. Now, again using the fact that Formula$f_c$ is much larger than the bandwidth of Formula$w\left(t \right)$, so that FormulaTeX Source$${{f_c^2 } \over 2}\int_{- \infty }^\infty {\left\vert {W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} >\!\! > {3 \over 2}\int_{- \infty }^\infty {f^2 \left\vert {W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df}.$$ Equation (8) can be further simplified to give FormulaTeX Source$$\beta ^2 \approx {{{{f_c^2 } \over 2}\int_{- \infty }^\infty {\left\vert {W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df} \over {3 \over 2}\int_{- \infty }^\infty {\left\vert {W\left(f \right)} \right\vert ^2 df}}} = {1 \over 3}f_c^2. \eqno{\hbox{(12)}}$$ Substituting (12) into (5) gives the CRB for ranging using signals of this form as FormulaTeX Source$$\sqrt {{{\rm var}} ({\hat d})} \ge {{\sqrt 3 c \over 2\sqrt 2 \pi \alpha R_P \sqrt {{{E_x } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{E_x } {N_0}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {N_0}}} f_c}}. \eqno{\hbox{(13)}}$$ From (13), we can observe that the CRB is inversely proportional to the frequency Formula$f_c$.

SECTION III

SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

Fig. 1 shows the indoor scenario that will be analyzed. White LEDs are installed on the ceiling for illumination, and these also transmit the signals that will be used for ranging. The sensor of the device for which the position is to be estimated is assumed to be at a distance Formula$h$ below the ceiling. It receives the signals from the LEDs and estimates its distance from each LED by measuring the TOA of the signal from that LED. The LEDs and the receiver are assumed to be perfectly synchronized to a common clock.

Figure 1
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the positioning system using white LEDs for indoor localization. The LEDs are installed on the ceiling and pointing down, the receiver setup is placed at a distance Formula$h$ below the ceiling, facing up.

The block diagram of the receiver and estimator is shown in Fig. 2. The optical filter is used to limit the optical spectrum of the light reaching the photodiode. The choice of the bandwidth of the optical filter affects both the power of the wanted signal component and the level of the noise. In optical wireless systems, the main source of noise is shot noise, which is proportional to the total light power reaching the photodiode [5], [6], so in situations where there is a high level of ambient light, it is desirable to choose an optical filter that passes only the optical frequencies used for the ranging signal. The filtered signal is then sent to the photodiode, which generates the electrical signal Formula$r\left(t \right)$ given by (1). Formula$r\left(t \right)$ is then input to the estimator which consists of a matched filter, a square-law device, and a max search device [19]– [20][21]. The TOA estimate is given by the time instant corresponding to the maximum absolute value at the output of the matched filter over the observation interval. From (13), it can be seen that the CRB depends on Formula$f_c, \alpha, E_x, R_p$, and Formula$N_0$. We will now discuss how each of these parameters depends on the geometry of the system, the transmitted signal, and the characteristics of the LEDs and the photodiode.

Figure 2
Fig. 2. Block diagram of the receiver and estimator.

The CRB is inversely proportional to Formula$f_c$. Thus, for accurate localization, it is desirable to use a frequency as high as possible, however the maximum value of Formula$f_c$ depends in quite subtle ways on the electrical and optical characteristics of both the LED in the transmitter, and the photodiode in the receiver. There are two general types of white lighting LEDs. One uses three LEDs: red, green, and blue, which in combination are perceived as white by the human eye. The second type, which is currently most commonly used, consists of a single blue LED and a phosphor coating, which produces light with a broad spectrum in the green-yellow-red (GYR) visible spectrum. In the calculations, we assume the second form of white LED. The modulation bandwidth of an LED is the maximum frequency with which the intensity of the light can be varied. For phosphor coated LEDs, the blue component can typically be modulated at frequencies up to 20 MHz but the GYR component is limited to 2 MHz [4], [9]. In this paper, we consider the case where Formula$f_c$ is limited to the modulation bandwidth of the GYR component, and the TOA estimate is derived from the entire spectrum of light transmitted by the white LED. (We note that using the approach in [9], it may be possible to improve the estimates by using only the blue component of light and using a higher value of Formula$f_c$). We assume that the electrical bandwidth of the photodiode is greater than Formula$f_c$ and so the transmitter, not the receiver limits the maximum value of Formula$f_c$.

The parameter Formula$\alpha$ is the signal attenuation of the optical channel between the LED and the photodiode in the scenario shown in Fig. 1. We assume that the receiver faces up and the white LEDs point down and are located within the field of view (FoV) of the receiver. Thus, the angle Formula$\phi$ which the receiver makes with a particular LED equals the angle of incidence of the receiver Formula$\varphi$, so Formula$\cos \phi = \cos \varphi = {h \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {h d}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} d}$, where Formula$d$ denotes the distance between this LED and the receiver. The area of the photodiode is Formula$S$. We assume that the optical filter is an ideal bandpass filter which causes no attenuation in the passband and completely blocks any optical frequencies in the stop band. For LOS, given a generalized Lambertian LED with order Formula$m$, the attenuation of the optical channel Formula$\alpha$ can be expressed as [6], [8] FormulaTeX Source$$\alpha = {{\left({m + 1} \right)S \over 2\pi d^2}}\cos ^m \phi \cos \varphi = {{\left({m + 1} \right)S \over 2\pi}}\left({{{h^{m + 1} \over d^{m + 3}}}} \right).\eqno{\hbox{(14)}}$$ The parameter Formula$E_x$ denotes the electrical energy of the ranging signal Formula$x\left(t \right)$. It can be calculated as FormulaTeX Source$$\eqalignno{E_x &= \int_0^T {x^2 \left(t \right)dt} \cr &= \int_0^T {\left[{w\left(t \right) + w\left(t \right)\cos \left({2\pi f_c t} \right)} \right]^2 dt} \cr &= \int_0^T {w^2 \left(t \right)dt} + \int_0^T {2w^2 \left(t \right)\cos \left({2\pi f_c t} \right)dt} \cr &\quad + \int_0^T {w^2 \left(t \right)\cos ^2 \left({2\pi f_c t} \right)dt}. &\hbox{(15)}}$$ Since the squared waveform varies slowly relative to the cosine function, the net area of the second term is very small compared with the other two terms. Therefore, the second term can be neglected and the electrical energy can be expressed as FormulaTeX Source$$\eqalignno{&\int_0^T {w^2 \left(t \right)dt} + \int_0^T {w^2 \left(t \right)\cos ^2 \left({2\pi f_c t} \right)dt} \cr &= \int_0^T {w^2 \left(t \right)dt} + {1 \over 2}\int_0^T {w^2 \left(t \right)dt} \cr &= {3 \over 2}\int_0^T {w^2 \left(t \right)dt}. &\hbox{(16)}}$$ The ranging signal Formula$x\left(t \right)$ is an intensity modulated optical signal whose brightness is determined by its average optical power. Unlike RF signals, the average power of an optical signal is given by its time average, i.e., Formula$\bar P_x = {\lim }_{T \to \infty } {1 \over T}\int_0^T {x\left(t \right)dt} = {\lim }_{T \to \infty } {1 \over T}\int_0^T {w\left(t \right)dt}$. Hence, we can observe that both the electrical energy and the average optical power are affected only by the window function Formula$w\left(t \right)$ as long as Formula$f_c$ is large compared with the bandwidth of Formula$w\left(t \right)$. Therefore, given an Formula$f_c$, the optimum window is the “smooth” window which maximizes the electrical energy Formula$E_x$ subject to a constraint on average optical power. In this paper, we choose a raised cosine signal given by FormulaTeX Source$${w\left(t \right) = A\left({1 + \cos \left({{{2\pi } \over T}t} \right)} \right),} \quad {- {T \over 2} \le t \le {T \over 2}}. \eqno{\hbox{(17)}}$$ We choose this window function because it is nonnegative in Formula${{- T} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{- T} 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2} \le t \le {T \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {T 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}$. Therefore, it can be used for IM/DD. This window is also a “smooth” window with a continuous first order derivative in its time duration. Consequently, the CRB is applicable [24]. Thus, the average emitted optical power Formula$\bar P_t$ is Formula$A$ which determines the brightness of the LED and the electrical energy of the ranging signal is given by Formula${{\left({9A^2 T} \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left({9A^2 T} \right)} 4}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 4}$ by (16).

The responsivity Formula$R_p$ is the conversion factor from the optical to electrical domain. It is a function of the wavelength of the light received [6], [9]. For a silicon photodiode, the relationship between the wavelength and the responsivity is relatively linear in the range of visible light, peaking at around 900 nm and falling sharply to zero above the cutoff frequency [6], [9]. The typical value of the responsivity is in the range of 0.2 mA/mW at 400 nm up to 0.6 mA/mW at the peak [9]. Due to this linear relationship, the responsivity is usually taken at the central optical frequency of operation [5]. In this paper, we assume the responsivity of the photodiode is a constant taken at the central optical frequency of visible light.

Shot noise induced by ambient light is the dominant component of the noise at the receiver because most optical wireless systems operate in the presence of high ambient light levels. The single-sided spectral density Formula$N_0$ of the shot noise is given by Formula$N_0 = 2qR_p P_a$, where Formula$q$ denotes the charge on an electron and Formula$P_a$ is the power of ambient light incident on the photodiode [6]. For the case where the ambient light is isotropic, the power of ambient light is given by Formula$P_a = p_n S\Delta \lambda$, where Formula$p_n$ is the background spectral irradiance [6]. Formula$\Delta \lambda$ is the bandwidth of the optical filter in front of the photodiode. Thus, the single-sided spectral density of the noise is given by FormulaTeX Source$$N_0 = 2qR_p p_n S\Delta \lambda.\eqno{\hbox{(18)}}$$

SECTION IV

NUMERICAL RESULTS

We now present results for the CRB for the positioning system described in the previous section for a range of parameter values. We study a room of height 2.5 m with a Lambertian LED Formula$(m = 1)$ installed on the ceiling. The receiver has an area Formula$S$ with responsivity Formula$R_p$ of 0.4 mA/mW [8]. We assume that the modulation bandwidth of the LED is 2 MHz. A value of Formula$p_n = 5.8 \times 10^{- 6} \hbox{W}/{\rm cm}^2 \cdot {\rm nm}$ is used for background spectral irradiance as this is a value often used in the literature [6], [10]. The bandwidth of the optical filter Formula$\Delta \lambda$ is chosen to be 360 nm (from 380 to 740 nm) as this covers the entire visible spectrum.

We first study the CRB for a range of values of Formula$f_c$. Fig. 3 plots the CRB versus the emitted optical power for a receiver 5 m from the LED. The duration of the window Formula$T$ is 0.01 s and the area Formula$S$ of the receiver is 1 cm2 [4], [7]. We vary Formula$f_c$ from 10 kHz up to 2 MHz. The CRB drops with increasing frequencies Formula$f_c$ as indicated by (13). For an average transmitted optical power of only 1 W and Formula$f_c = 2$ MHz the CR bound is less than 3 cm.

Figure 3
Fig. 3. CRB versus optical power with various frequencies of sinusoid signal.

Next, we study the impact of the waveform duration. We use the same settings as in Fig. 3 but vary the window duration from 0.001 to 0.1 s. An Formula$f_c$ of 2 MHz is used. In Fig. 4, the CRB is plotted as a function of the transmitted optical power. The CRB falls as the duration of the window Formula$T$ increases. This is because, even though the average optical power is independent of Formula$T$, the electrical energy Formula$E_x$ is proportional to Formula$T$. This graph again shows that low values of CRB are achievable with practical parameter values. For example, for a transmitted optical power of 1 W and a waveform lasting 10 ms, the CRB is less than 3 cm.

Figure 4
Fig. 4. CRB versus the emitted optical power with various time durations.

Now, we consider the effect of the distance from transmitter to receiver. The parameter settings are the same as in Fig. 4 except that Formula$T$ is fixed at 0.01 s. In Fig. 5, the CRB is plotted versus optical power. As the attenuation Formula$\alpha$ decreases with the increasing distance Formula$d$ the receiver put at a larger distance receives lower optical power and therefore lower electrical energy, resulting in the increase of the CRB. However, even at 6 m, the CRB is around 5 cm for 1 W of transmitted optical power.

Figure 5
Fig. 5. CRB versus the emitted optical power with various distances.

Finally, we investigate how the CRB behaves as we vary the area of the receiver photodetecting surface Formula$S$. In Fig. 6, the CRB is plotted versus optical power for various receiver areas and for Formula$T$ = 0.01 s, Formula$f_c$ = 2 MHz, and Formula$d$ = 5 m. It shows that for a given optical power, the CRB drops with increasing receiver area. At 1 W of optical power, the CRB for a receiver of 0.25 cm 2 is about 5 cm. This falls to just about 2 cm if the receiver area is increased to 1 cm2.

Figure 6
Fig. 6. CRB versus the emitted optical power with various receiver areas.

The dependence on Formula$S$ can be explained by analyzing the dependence of the channel and the noise on the receiver area. From (14) and (18), it can be seen that both Formula$\alpha$ and Formula$N_0$ depend linearly on the area Formula$S$. Rearranging (13) and substituting (14) and (18) gives FormulaTeX Source$$\eqalignno{\sqrt {{{\rm var}} ({\hat d})} &\ge {c \over {2\sqrt 2 \pi \alpha R_p \sqrt {{{E_x } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{E_x } {N_0}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {N_0}}} \beta}} \cr &= {{c\sqrt {N_0 } \over 2\sqrt 2 \pi \alpha R_p \sqrt {E_x } \beta}} \cr &= {{c\sqrt {2qR_p p_n S\Delta \lambda } \over \sqrt 2 \left({m + 1} \right)S\left({{{h^{m + 1} \over d^{m + 3}}}} \right)R_p \sqrt {E_x } \beta}} \cr &= {{c\sqrt {2qR_p p_n \Delta \lambda } \over \sqrt 2 \left({m + 1} \right)\sqrt S \left({{{h^{m + 1} \over d^{m + 3}}}} \right)R_p \sqrt {E_x } \beta}} &\hbox{(19)}}$$ which shows that the CRB is inversely proportional to Formula$\sqrt S$.

SECTION V

CONCLUSION

We have presented an analysis of the CRB of TOA-based ranging for an indoor positioning system based on IM/DD signals transmitted by white lighting LEDs. A dc-biased windowed sinusoid is used as the ranging function. It is shown that the CRB is inversely proportional to the frequency of the sinusoid. A detailed discussion on the parameters that determine the CRB and their dependence on the geometry of the system, the transmitted signal and the characteristics of the LEDs and the photodiode are also presented. Finally, we show that, in a realistic indoor application, assuming perfect synchronization between the transmitter and receiver, the bounds on position estimation accuracy are typically in the order of millimeters or centimeters depending on the geometry of the room, the frequency and power of the transmitted signal and the properties of the LED and the photoreceiver.

Footnotes

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council's (ARC) discovery funding scheme under Grant DP 1094218.

References

No Data Available

Authors

No Photo Available

Thomas Q. Wang

Thomas Q. Wang received the B.E. degree in electric engineering from Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian, China, in 2006 and the M.E. and Ph.D. degrees in communication and information systems from Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China, in 2008 and 2011, respectively. From 2012, he works as a Research Fellow with the Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. His research interests include wireless optical communications, cognitive radio, cooperative communications, and multiple-input multiple output (MIMO) technology.

No Photo Available

Y. Ahmet Sekercioglu

Y. Ahmet Sekercioglu received the B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees from Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, all in electrical and electronics engineering and the Ph.D. degree from Swinburne University of Technology. He is a member of the academic staff at the Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering of Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. He was the Leader of the Applications Program of Australian Telecommunications CRC until the completion of the center's research activities (December 2007). He lectured at Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia for 8 years. Prior to his academic career, he held numerous positions as a Research Engineer in private industry. He has published 22 journal articles, 2 book chapters, 71 conference papers, and has filed 2 patents. His recent research is on distributed algorithms for self-organization in wireless sensor and ad hoc networks, and networked robotics.

No Photo Available

Adrian Neild

Adrian Neild received the Ph.D. degree in engineering from the University of Warwick, in 2003. Subsequently, he worked as a Postdoctoral Researcher at the Institute for Mechanical Systems at ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich). He is currently an Australian Research Fellow and Associate Professor at Monash University, Australia. Since 2006, he has been a faculty member at Monash University, his research interests include the fields of ultrasonic transducers, beam forming, synthetic aperture focusing, and the use of ultrasound in microfluidic systems.

No Photo Available

Jean Armstrong

Jean Armstrong (M’89–SM’06) received the B.Sc. (First Class Hons.) degree in electrical engineering from the University of Edinburgh, Scotland, in 1974, the M.Sc. degree in digital techniques from Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland, in 1980, and the Ph.D. degree in digital communications from Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, in 1993. From 1974 to 1977, she worked as a design engineer at Hewlett-Packard, Ltd., Scotland.

In 1977, she was appointed Lecturer in electrical engineering at the University of Melbourne, Australia. Since 1977, she has been helding a range of academic positions at the University of Melbourne, Monash University and La Trobe University. She is currently a Professor at Monash University.

Her research interests include digital communications, engineering education, and women in engineering. Most of her recent research has been on orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) and she has published many very highly cited papers and has six fully commercialized patents in this field. Her earlier OFDM work was on RF wireless applications, but in 2005 she recognized the potential for applying OFDM to optical communications. She has been the recipient of numerous awards including induction into the Victorian Honor Roll of Women, the Peter Doherty for the best commercialization opportunity in Australia in 2006 (joint winner), Institution of Engineers, Australia, Engineering 2000 Award, Zonta International Amelia Earhart Fellowship, and Caroline Haslett Memorial Scholarship. She is a Fellow of the Institution of Engineers Australia. She is currently a member of the Australian Research Council (ARC) College of Experts.

Cited By

No Data Available

Keywords

Corrections

None

Multimedia

Archive

Position Accuracy of Time-of-Arrival Based Ranging Using Visible Light With Application in Indoor Localization Systems Multimedia

Download
This paper appears in:
No Data Available
Issue Date:
No Data Available
On page(s):
No Data Available
ISSN:
None
INSPEC Accession Number:
None
Digital Object Identifier:
None
Date of Current Version:
No Data Available
Date of Original Publication:
No Data Available

Text Size